Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 [align=center]This is my Latest card. And I loved it. It was going to be one of those cards that gets made, but never posted, but it turned out too good to have such a fate. Heath, the RangerIf you control a face-up Spellcaster-Type monster, this card is also treated as Spellcaster-Type. When this card is Normal Summoned without a Tribute, you can draw 2 cards. Once per turn, you can discard 2 cards. If you do, This card can attack 1 other monster your opponent controls during your Battle Phase. During your Draw Phase, instead of drawing, you can look at up to 3 cards from your opponent's hand. If any of them are Trap Cards, send them to the Graveyard. Art bysergon2[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runer5h Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 When this card is Normal Summoned without a Tribute... how, pray tell? Nevertheless, not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Cost down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoboJoe Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 "If you control a face-up Spellcaster-Type monster, this card is also treated as a Spellcaster.""When this card is Normal Summoned without a Tribute, you can draw 2 cards." - How is it able to be Normal Summoned without a Tribute?""If you do, this card can attack twice during the Battle Phase.""During your Draw Phase, instead of drawing, you can look at up to 3 cards from your opponent's hand. If any of them are Trap Cards, send them to the Graveyard." - Too OP Plus, a level 5 star monster with 2300 ATK with this kind of an effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Dont fix my OCG. Besides, you messed up fixing it anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoboJoe Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Whoa. . sorry for trying to help. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runer5h Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Dont fix my OCG. Besides' date=' you messed up fixing it anyway.[/quote'] Not really - he just fixed it. Isn't that one of the reasons we post cards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Hobo Joe, sorry. Im not in a good mood. Runer5h, no. I dont need people tampering with my OCG. I want comments on my effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runer5h Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Fine, fine... it's overpowered. That much power in a 5 star? It can be a double attacker with one little discard, and you can see at least half of your opponent's hand each turn. At least raise its level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 To what, a six star? If I make it a seven, half its effect is then useless and then its underpowered. I will fix the double attacker thing then. The hand effect stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Meh? You need at least 1 card + This for the 2 cards.Making it even. But then... Eh... Still, I think it's underpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom™ Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Im not in a good mood. I don't need your attitude! [/fail attempt at joke with your avi] Anyway the card is cool, original effect, don't see OCG errors, kinda overpowered as others said, but, awesome :P Also, LCM = Legendary Card Makers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 UP, and OP. What is it.Yes. LCM = Legendary Cardmaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Ledger... LEDGER...! ... ... sorry for the impassion'd outburst; The Will will now judge this pretender. Eh... the only way I know how to get this to the field without Tributin' (at least to the immediate recollect) is through Mausoleum of the Emperor. Drawin' 2 cards, all well and good. What concerns me, however, is its multi-attackin' requirement - you dispose of 2 cards, effectively limitin' its playability, especially considerin' that YGO already has multi-attackers that do not impose such paralyzin' restraints (though Machine Lord Ur's is even more dauntin'... but I digress). The last two sentences doesn't especially concern me, for reasons I need not discuss. Notice that I don't care about the art, even if it happens to be stupendous (and, in your case, it hardly is). So... 6/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
六兆年と一夜物語 Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 10/10 Great EffectAlthough kinda OV'P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 I think you tried to mess up a little too many effects on it, that made it a bit confusing. Try more likely making it a support card or something with some of those effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Mausoleum of the Emperor says hi... Anyway, yeah it's fun and all, but it's highly abusable. I'd lower the last effect to one or two cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Did the image break? I don't see it. edit: lol, it works as soon as I type this edit2: You seem to have a good idea here. Its an interesting card. The only odd thing is, what is the point of making him into a spellcaster? Maybe I'm missing a combo here. If you don't need it you can drop that effect. I find the hand related effects balanced, you after all are using up 2 cards just to to attack twice and skipping your draw phase to look for trap cards that may already be set on the field. The ability to be versatile is whats good here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 I Love it. The versatility of Effect the card has is amazing. Ever hear of DAD? I did'nt think so. But, I know its great and all, but I Think it only has one effect. Great, but boring. DAD: Great but Boring 10/10This: Great. 9/10 My reason is: Who cares if it is a spellcaster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blud Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 HUNTER, PLEASE NOTE THAT WHATEVER I SAY ABOUT THIS CARD IS NOT JEALOUSY! Everything about this card is good, but the pic kind of bothers me. If it would go down more going back to before you cropped it (if you did), I think the crop should be at the top of his head where the horns meet the top, maybe just a little overlapping. EDIT: Maybe the elbow to the side, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Although I would probably make a couple of minor changes, I love the overall concept. If this card were real I would probably use it...it would def be in my side deck at the very least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choke Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Well as I read from previous posts, you don't want people boasting about OCG. But, I just want to say, there are some obvious ones and some subtle ones, but I won't mention them. The overall concept is pretty good. I think i'm the only one who likes the pic, I think it's the best part. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like there's 3 different effects slammed into 1. The name is okay, original I guess. Still a great card maker, but, truthfully, i'm not very impressed, or satisfied. 7/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsterikcAde Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Wow, pretty solid and the effect is sweet! If this card was real, I wouldn't mind to have it in my collection! 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted February 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 lol. My card is skeptical. Its either underpowered, or overpowered. To some its perfect, to some its full of errors. Im not going to make any edits to it unless an OCG master gives me a hand. IMHO, no one has earned a rep. =/ Thanks everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choke Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Well I could tell you some of the obvious ones.... If you control a face-up Spellcaster-Type monster, this card is also treated as Spellcaster-Type. When this card is Normal Summoned without a Tribute, you can draw 2 cards. Once per turn, you can discard 2 cards. If this effect is used, this card can attack 2 monster's your opponent controls during your Battle Phase. During your Draw Phase, instead of drawing, you can look at up to 3 cards from your opponent's hand. If any of them are Trap Cards, send them to the Graveyard. The first sentence seems a little weird, a little incomplete. I'm not going to correct that because im not sure. But if I would. I would do this: This card is treated as a Spellcaster-Type monster as long as another Spellcaster-Type monster remains face-up on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.