Azuh Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 "HI KIDS! WANNA SEE MY PENIS! IT TASTE LIKE LOLLIPOPS TOO!" =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Pedophilia is a no no. Also Zilla that person looks in their 20s' date=' so I doubt that is your GF. Sixteen is the age you are allowed to have sex at actually Omega.[/quote'] But bestiality or "zoophilia" isn't a "no no"? "HI KIDS! WANNA SEE MY PENIS! IT TASTE LIKE LOLLIPOPS TOO!" =/ Hell yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 lol. No >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaos_demon Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 those who dont agree are (srry to say) r morons. Back in the day and I mean gorge washinton back 30 year old men used to take 15 year old girls as wives....u need to understand no matter what sociaties say once ur capable of having children(men=12-13 years;women=9-11 years old) ur an adult. Btw pedophillia is describe for people who want sexual relations with children under the stated ages look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 those who dont agree are (srry to say) r morons. Back in the day and I mean gorge washinton back 30 year old men used to take 15 year old girls as wives....u need to understand no matter what sociaties say once ur capable of having children(men=12-13 years;women=9-11 years old) ur an adult. Btw pedophillia is describe for people who want sexual relations with children under the stated ages look it up. Oh I'm sorry. Apparently I'm a moron for not sharing your opinion about taking young boys and girls and turning them into my sex slaves at such a young age, scarring their life and laying waste to their future, hopes and dreams for some sick twisted short-termed pleasure I might get from that. wow, I must say that after knowing that when George Washington was a president it was allowed. Damn I'm a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 those who dont agree are (srry to say) r morons. Back in the day and I mean gorge washinton back 30 year old men used to take 15 year old girls as wives....u need to understand no matter what sociaties say once ur capable of having children(men=12-13 years;women=9-11 years old) ur an adult. Btw pedophillia is describe for people who want sexual relations with children under the stated ages look it up. Oh I'm sorry. Apparently I'm a moron for not sharing your opinion about taking young boys and girls and turning them into my sex slaves at such a young age' date=' scarring their life and laying waste to their future, hopes and dreams for some sick twisted short-termed pleasure I might get from that. wow, I must say that after knowing that when George Washington was a president it was allowed. Damn I'm a moron.[/quote'] Why stop only at Washington? Back in Rome, it was all the rage to have 12 year old boys be your sex slaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problematica Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 those who dont agree are (srry to say) r morons. Back in the day and I mean gorge washinton back 30 year old men used to take 15 year old girls as wives....u need to understand no matter what sociaties say once ur capable of having children(men=12-13 years;women=9-11 years old) ur an adult. Btw pedophillia is describe for people who want sexual relations with children under the stated ages look it up. So we should also be able to:Do terroristic acts against the country that is in charge of us/ we live inAttack federal employees because we don't like themHave slavesKill and rape Native AmericansKill animals at free willHave duels with pistolsSpread disease and famineDeclare indpendence from the USetc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaos_demon Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Im not talking about slaves! Im talking about the fact that although society condones this types of thing it is possible to have a stable normal relationship with a fertile person of the opposite sex....no matter the age.......its just the fact that we as people put the "adult" age bar way to high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 So we should also be able to...Do terroristic acts against the country that is in charge of us/ we live inNo.Attack federal employees because we don't like themNo.Have slavesNo.Kill and rape Native AmericansKill animals at free willNo.Have duels with pistolsYes.Spread disease and famineNo.Declare indpendence from the USYES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKS-Saga-Star7 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Im not talking about slaves! Im talking about the fact that although society condones this types of thing it is possible to have a stable normal relationship with a fertile person of the opposite sex....no matter the age.......its just the fact that we as people put the "adult" age bar way to high. I'll put it like this. The law can tell people what to do. People break rules.Let people decide for themselves what's best. If you can get a job,you're an adult. But, this statement here, I don't agree with it. It's like if I said,"I'm 28,you're 14. I have candy. Jump in my car,pull down my pants,and I gives you jolly rancherz." The adult bar isn't too high. 16-18 seems decent enough to call for age range to have sex. Besides,the young enough ones who are stupid to not fully understand sex well....Look at "Magic" Johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problematica Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Im not talking about slaves! Im talking about the fact that although society condones this types of thing it is possible to have a stable normal relationship with a fertile person of the opposite sex....no matter the age.......its just the fact that we as people put the "adult" age bar way to high. But you said that during Washington's time it was acceptable, so was slavery.Yes, it is quite possible. But the problem is the person's maturity to whether they can handle situations of this matter. A 13 year old who goes through our modern society is most likely to be incompetant at parentage and lacking in the responsibility to handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKS-Saga-Star7 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaos_demon Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 But you said that during Washington's time it was acceptable' date=' so was slavery.Yes, it is quite possible. But the problem is the person's maturity to whether they can handle situations of this matter. A 13 year old who goes through our modern society is most likely to be incompetant at parentage and lacking in the responsibility to handle it.[/quote'] But isnt that the fault of society? Leave it to humans to reject nature and place thier own rules of whats right and wrong. Parenting used to be a instinct....now there r schools with "parenting" classes. Who R we to reject our primal desires....look sex with a minor is wrong that ill admit....but during puberty the tittle of minor goes out the window. Many parents do not understand this...or have u not seen the "New, Cool" fasion that little kids were today....its like breeding little sluts and whores. I am truly srry that it has to be put that way....but I'm saying it cause its the "look" of being "sexy" that attracs these molestors in the first place. If your "society" cares much about the safety of Minors then y not inforce better rules of conduct in our society? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Loli is legal in Ohio, so i insta win this thread =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Im not talking about slaves! Im talking about the fact that although society condones this types of thing it is possible to have a stable normal relationship with a fertile person of the opposite sex....no matter the age.......its just the fact that we as people put the "adult" age bar way to high. I think the whole point is the way they go about it. What I mean is, both physically and mentally, what is the difference between a seventeen-year-old and an eighteen-year-old? Very little, actually. There is no miraculous transformation in either mind or body between those ages that makes it okay or not okay to have sex. I suppose that the line had to be drawn somewhere between 16 and 21, and 18 was as good an age as any. But I'll give you a case in point. I happen to live in the same neighborhood as a registered sex offender. He's not a perverted old man, he's just some guy who dated a sixteen-year-old girl while he was eighteen. They had sex and videotaped it, apparently, and then he got caught. The sex was completely consensual, and yet his life and reputation have been completely ruined because of this. It will follow him everywhere and he will never live it down. Doesn't seem right, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Pedophilia is a no no. Also Zilla that person looks in their 20s' date=' so I doubt that is your GF. Sixteen is the age you are allowed to have sex at actually Omega.[/quote'] check the enlarged pic of her i posted a while back. And she is 16 not 20. On topic: Why would anybody other than idiots want this legal? I get the whole 18 and 16 deal but 47 and 9? I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 This topic disgusts me. Not only is paedophilia sick, and wrong, but this is a children's forum. OP should be banned at the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 This topic disgusts me. Not only is paedophilia sick' date=' and wrong, but this is a children's forum. OP should be banned at the least.[/quote'] OP did it for the lulz. And calling it sick and wrong really doesn't prove anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 OP did it for the lulz. And calling it sick and wrong really doesn't prove anything. "For the lulz" isn't a valid reason. Common sense logic applies here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Uugh... This topic is sick and ends with this. Fact, before the 1900's/20th Century. Pedophilia was all but illegal, due to arranged marriages and the roles of women being MUCH MUCH less than they have now. Which they now have all the rights of men, apart from lasting stereotypes. They had the role of the housekeeper, and did all the chores besides what the slaves did and the job to keep money flowing etc. So Pedophilia was quite alright, due to that it had no penalty for it. But in todays society, there is much greater penalties for such an act. And a much broader spectrum of responsibilities, for both Genders as well as things to do and influences. Such an act has been deemed morally and ethically wrong. While not directly Morally and Ethically wrong, it is rightfully deemed so as a proper illusion. As it would cripple anyone should the wrong outcome occur. As well as other implications due to much easier emotional scaring and the like... inb4iforgotmales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
problematica Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 But isnt that the fault of society? Leave it to humans to reject nature and place thier own rules of whats right and wrong. Parenting used to be a instinct....now there r schools with "parenting" classes. Who R we to reject our primal desires....look sex with a minor is wrong that ill admit....but during puberty the tittle of minor goes out the window. Many parents do not understand this...or have u not seen the "New' date=' Cool" fasion that little kids were today....its like breeding little sluts and whores. I am truly srry that it has to be put that way....but I'm saying it cause its the "look" of being "sexy" that attracs these molestors in the first place. If your "society" cares much about the safety of Minors then y not inforce better rules of conduct in our society?[/quote'] Now you are saying we should be animalistic and forget civilization as a whole. Since that was our original nature and aparently you disagree with anything outside of it. During puberty, yes they have the ability to have children but that doesn't mean that they should or have the capacity to handle those children. Back in primitive times it was so much easier for the younger to take care of children because we didn't have the social structure and technological complications that we do now.If we legalize a younger age to have sex all we are doing is promoting sex with even younger people. People are obsessing over children usually around the 16 age mark because there isn't as much danger to have sex with them since they are less likely to tell because of their closeness to the legal age. However, if we lower the legal age to 16 then we have people obsessing over 14 year olds, and so on and so on...There are several rules of conduct in our society, but the police and anyone who would report on such things can not be everywhere. How are they going to tell two 15 year old kids to stop having sex if they aren't in the bedroom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.