Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't 4 stars monsters with such a high defense need a negative effect. I would run this over Defender. The art is cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dead draw Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 10/10. If I drew anything half as good, I'd probably want to OP it too...but why isn't it an Insect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 b/c beast-warriors are under-used and under-appreciated...and I thought that the ATK balanced the DEF...besides that...it's effect doesnt work if you have any other DEF monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
§hadow §triker Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Not bad art. But the effect is not very good. But if it has such high DEF in it a drawback just as Envoy of Infinity said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 b/c beast-warriors are under-used and under-appreciated...and I thought that the ATK balanced the DEF...besides that...it's effect doesnt work if you have any other DEF monsters. but people don't usually defend unless they have no other choice. it needs a negative effect or its not realistic. drawing a card if one op'ed card is not the only card on the field makes it more op'ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 okay...will update soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cursedhydra Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 9/10 for art i am impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tohob Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't 4 stars monsters with such a high defense need a negative effect. I would run this over Defender. The art is cool! i dont think so. i've got a sand moth, and it only has 400 less defense, but it has 600 more attack, and a pretty awesome effect. I think getting rid of 600 ATK for an extra 400 DEF is perfectly O.K. =/~actually took out Sand moth and re-read it before posting this~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't 4 stars monsters with such a high defense need a negative effect. I would run this over Defender. The art is cool! i dont think so. i've got a sand moth' date=' and it only has 400 less defense, but it has 600 more attack, and a pretty awesome effect. I think getting rid of 600 ATK for an extra 400 DEF is perfectly O.K. =/~actually took out Sand moth and re-read it before posting this~[/quote'] Goblin Attack Force is just 300 ATK higher than Genetically Warped Warwolf, and 800 less DEF. Is that ok too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al9090 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 nice 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1337noob Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 nice art, u drew or used comp? anyway, nice card. 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 drew in paint and edited with gimp...so then, is the effct balanced or no? I have ppl saying both... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 much like destiny hero defender with a positive effect, i don't like it for that reason. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 What did you changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 oops...forgot to post the updated card...check the effect now! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 People will still use this over gardna and defender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 are you saying it's unbalanced or are you saying it's a good card? can I get a rating? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I expected either Machine or Insect-Types, I was not dissappointed Awesome artwork is awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I expected either Machine or Insect-Types' date=' I was not dissappointed Awesome artwork is awesome[/quote'] thanks! ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. 23 II Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 WAY over powered. Not only is the DEF really high but unrealisticly good effect. Offbalance: 6/10... Great art though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant F.U.R.Y.™ Posted March 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 WAY over powered. Not only is the DEF really high but unrealisticly good effect. Offbalance: 6/10... Great art though suggestions to balance it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:|Fallen|:. Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 this is quite good8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.