Guest Star Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 [align=center][/align] Yay, I'm back with another alternate art version of a card using another card's art. Should this card be at 0? Why or why not? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostLetter227 Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Is that Duelist Kingdom's entry card? It's okay, but shouldn't be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Is that Duelist Kingdom's entry card? It's okay' date=' but shouldn't be banned.[/quote'] Are you sure? In a slower Meta, with the proper cards banned, this card could easily become very dangerous. And yes, it is the Duelist Kingdom (The Glory of the King's Hand) Entry Card image. I find it more fitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Bannable on any good list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 A Chain of 4 could be hard to do properlly. If you can set it up well then the card should be at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Bannable on any good list. Anything's bannable on a good list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Bannable on any good list. Anything's bannable on a good list. Really? Aitsu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostLetter227 Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Bannable on any good list. Anything's bannable on a good list. Really? Aitsu? Zone Eater. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Really? Aitsu? Of course' date=' but just because something's [i']bannable[/i] doesn't mean they're banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Really? Aitsu? Of course' date=' but just because something's [i']bannable[/i] doesn't mean they're banworthy. If it bans non-banworthy things than it's not a good list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 It's banworthy, but it really is arguable either way. Mostly depending on if you feel a deck full of nothing but draw is a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 Really? Aitsu? Of course' date=' but just because something's [i']bannable[/i] doesn't mean they're banworthy. If it bans non-banworthy things than it's not a good list. If everything's a good choice except some random Aitsu ban thrown in, then it becomes a good list as opposed to a great list or fantastic list. I think we can agree that there're many adjectives out there more positive towards what they're describing than "good". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 this card is about as bannable as pot of avarice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 this card is about as bannable as pot of avarice You're about as good at this game as a brick wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 yhea of course! star ¬_¬. you actually dont even have the right to say that to me!, your trying to turn everythign thinkign your terrible at the game around on me because im not following the crouds answear think this card is a +1 that requires a fair bit of dedication to work, this realy only fits into a chain burn deck as if this card worked anywhere else the cards from cyberdark impact would be useful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 18, 2009 Report Share Posted March 18, 2009 yhea of course! star ¬_¬. you actually dont even have the right to say that to me!' date=' your trying to turn everythign thinkign your terrible at the game around on me because im not following the crouds answear think this card is a +1 that requires a fair bit of dedication to work, this realy only fits into a chain burn deck as if this card worked anywhere else the cards from cyberdark impact would be useful![/quote'] I wasn't turning anything around on you, lol. I'm horrible at this game. I have no problem saying it. As a matter of fact, I rarely ever play anymore. Still, you're not looking at the bigger picture. In this Meta, it might not be banworthy, but overall, it's definitely arguable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkerai Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 LOL at the thought of banning a trap that requires you to use at least 3 other cards in order to be activated. Were not even talking I play 2 D-draws and 2 allures were talkin friggen chainable traps or spells, seariously you need to have a deck built around chaining(chain burn) to use this consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 exactly ---^ think about it this way is levia dragon daedalus bannable?no because it requires a feild spell card to use its effect, it has a good effect but it requres quite a bit of setup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 LOL at the thought of banning a trap that requires you to use at least 3 other cards in order to be activated. Were not even talking I play 2 D-draws and 2 allures were talkin friggen chainable traps or spells' date=' seariously you need to have a deck built around chaining(chain burn) to use this consistently.[/quote'] Again, you're not looking at the big picture. With a good banlist, the format would be a lot slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 oh star i feel as if what i said was rather harsh im sorry =/ but, heres the thing even in a slower meta this card isnt ban worthy, as in a slower meta less chanables woudl be used, there woudl be no mass destruction ect... as i previously said this card only fits in chain burn, can you tell me another decent deck that can possibly use this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 oh star i feel as if what i said was rather harsh im sorry =/ but' date=' heres the thing even in a slower meta this card isnt ban worthy, as in a slower meta less chanables woudl be used, there woudl be no mass destruction ect... as i previously said this card only fits in chain burn, can you tell me another decent deck that can possibly use this?[/quote'] Well you gotta look at the aspect of how easily this could be used in a slower Meta. You could easily make good use of this in many Decks with or without Burn Cards. Just because the Meta slows down, doesn't mean Chainable Traps won't be used. I'm sure Monarch Decks could profit from this easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 oh star i feel as if what i said was rather harsh im sorry =/ but' date=' heres the thing even in a slower meta this card isnt ban worthy, as in a slower meta less chanables woudl be used, there woudl be no mass destruction ect... as i previously said this card only fits in chain burn, can you tell me another decent deck that can possibly use this?[/quote'] Well you gotta look at the aspect of how easily this could be used in a slower Meta. You could easily make good use of this in many Decks with or without Burn Cards. Just because the Meta slows down, doesn't mean Chainable Traps won't be used. I'm sure Monarch Decks could profit from this easily. i run accumulative fortune in all my monarch decks, because im just that pro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 oh star i feel as if what i said was rather harsh im sorry =/ but' date=' heres the thing even in a slower meta this card isnt ban worthy, as in a slower meta less chanables woudl be used, there woudl be no mass destruction ect... as i previously said this card only fits in chain burn, can you tell me another decent deck that can possibly use this?[/quote'] Well you gotta look at the aspect of how easily this could be used in a slower Meta. You could easily make good use of this in many Decks with or without Burn Cards. Just because the Meta slows down, doesn't mean Chainable Traps won't be used. I'm sure Monarch Decks could profit from this easily. i run accumulative fortune in all my monarch decks, because im just that pro! Yeah that's right because you duel in a format with a good banlist! Owait.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaos_demon Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Father wolf....what do u use to chain off for it? BTW is a slow meta this card is dangerous due to slow meta massive set-up potentel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.