Guest Star Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Father wolf....what do u use to chain off for it? Please tell me you're not serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Maybe at 1 or 2.There's gotta be 3 Cards before it. Good Luck! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Maybe at 1 or 2.There's gotta be 3 Cards before it. Good Luck! :lol: Good goblin housekeeping, Reckless, Secret Barrel, Accumulative fortune, and chain strike. no C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER for u my friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Well, I know it can be easy to chain sometimes, but not all the time.But now, I could see it being banned somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 @father wolf/chain vanity's call getting to chain link 4 on spell speed 2 is hard.very situationalvery silly.i dont care where it is on the banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Good goblin housekeeping' date=' Reckless, Secret Barrel, [b']RIGHT HERE I PLAY MY SOLEM JUDGMENT.[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 right now lets asses the above combo! its 4-5 cards that allows for some advantage, but then there is other card which allow for good +1s that are only 1 card and there is 2 card combos that win games! i.e ultimate offering + lonefire blossom onceagin this is acard that crabhelmet says should be B& and everyone blindly follows him without thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 I have this card in my CureBurn deck on DMU, and I was dueling Icy with it last night. It was actually really easy to get a chain link of 4 to pull this out, I did it the turn after I set it. I dunno if it should be banned, especially in this meta, but it does seem rather easy to use/abuse. Though, I'm not exactly an expert on this sort of thing :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 right now lets asses the above combo! its 4-5 cards that allows for some advantage' date=' but then there is other card which allow for good +1s that are only 1 card and there is 2 card combos that win games! i.e ultimate offering + lonefire blossom onceagin this is acard that crabhelmet says should be B& and everyone blindly follows him without thinking[/quote'] I'll be honest, when the possibility of banning this card first came to me, it was when I first saw Atem's List. I had completely disagreed with the idea, as it had not made much, if any at all, sense to me. Then, Crab Helmet explained it to me, and I still wasn't a big fan of banning it, although I did so on a couple of lists just to "fit in". Keep in mind, this was many months ago. Then, a couple of months back, I played against a really good player (way out of my league) who was running a Chain Burn Deck for fun. The card was devastating in there, and that's when I realized that if it could be slightly good in a fast Meta, it could be even more devastating in a slower Meta. This is one of the situations where I proved your "Crab Helmet is a god and everybody worships him" Theory wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 onceagin this is acard that crabhelmet says should be B& and everyone blindly follows him without thinking I think it's arguable that this card should be banned. I don't worship Crab Helmet. u mad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Good goblin housekeeping' date=' Reckless, Secret Barrel, [b']RIGHT HERE I PLAY MY SOLEM JUDGEMENT.[/b] nice C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER lol NOT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 right now lets asses the above combo! its 4-5 cards that allows for some advantage' date=' but then there is other card which allow for good +1s that are only 1 card and there is 2 card combos that win games! i.e ultimate offering + lonefire blossom onceagin this is acard that crabhelmet says should be B& and everyone blindly follows him without thinking[/quote'] I'll be honest, when the possibility of banning this card first came to me, it was when I first saw Atem's List. I had completely disagreed with the idea, as it had not made much, if any at all, sense to me. Then, Crab Helmet explained it to me, and I still wasn't a big fan of banning it, although I did so on a couple of lists just to "fit in". Keep in mind, this was many months ago. Then, a couple of months back, I played against a really good player (way out of my league) who was running a Chain Burn Deck for fun. The card was devastating in there, and that's when I realized that if it could be slightly good in a fast Meta, it could be even more devastating in a slower Meta. This is one of the situations where I proved your "Crab Helmet is a god and everybody worships him" Theory wrong. heres the thing!, chainburn is the ONLY deck this card can fit into effectivly! and anyhoo chainburn would be unneffected by this ullusive "perfect meta", we only have 1 meta, the one we have right now and in this meta, no! acumulated fortune should not be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 right now lets asses the above combo! its 4-5 cards that allows for some advantage' date=' but then there is other card which allow for good +1s that are only 1 card and there is 2 card combos that win games! i.e ultimate offering + lonefire blossom onceagin this is acard that crabhelmet says should be B& and everyone blindly follows him without thinking[/quote'] I'll be honest, when the possibility of banning this card first came to me, it was when I first saw Atem's List. I had completely disagreed with the idea, as it had not made much, if any at all, sense to me. Then, Crab Helmet explained it to me, and I still wasn't a big fan of banning it, although I did so on a couple of lists just to "fit in". Keep in mind, this was many months ago. Then, a couple of months back, I played against a really good player (way out of my league) who was running a Chain Burn Deck for fun. The card was devastating in there, and that's when I realized that if it could be slightly good in a fast Meta, it could be even more devastating in a slower Meta. This is one of the situations where I proved your "Crab Helmet is a god and everybody worships him" Theory wrong. heres the thing!, chainburn is the ONLY deck this card can fit into effectivly! and anyhoo chainburn would be unneffected by this ullusive "perfect meta", we only have 1 meta, the one we have right now and in this meta, no! acumulated fortune should not be banned. Terrible. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 it isn't a bad card, but the fact it does need 3 cards played infront of it does hurt it's chances to work. however, in a deck made to chain, it will work, and realy well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 ---^ all the cards from cyberdark impact lying at the bottom of tins of bad commons all get up and wave frantically!ykno why they are there, because they AINT GOOD! also star, this meta isnt bad at all!, infact this is probably the best meta we have had in a loooong time!, you cant base a card on somthign that dosnt exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 ---^ all the cards from cyberdark impact lying at the bottom of tins of bad commons all get up and wave frantically!ykno why they are there' date=' because they AINT GOOD! also star, this meta isnt bad at all!, infact this is probably the best meta we have had in a loooong time!, you cant base a card on somthign that dosnt exist.[/quote'] Of course not. However you can't base the banworthiness of a card on the current Meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 eeeeh urrrm yes! :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 eeeeh urrrm yes! :S This is why people say you're bad at the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 it is good but requires the chain, which requires somewhat skill and set up, I wouldn't use it in my current Deck (Spellcasters, I know it doesn't have anything to do with this card but this way I'm saying its not that splashable and therefore not banworthy)I wouldn't worry too much about this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 it is good but requires the chain' date=' which requires somewhat skill and set up, I wouldn't use it in my current Deck (Spellcasters, I know it doesn't have anything to do with this card but this way I'm saying its not that splashable and therefore not banworthy)I wouldn't worry too much about this card.[/quote'] It's really doesn't require that much Set-up or Skill, really. All you do is set a bunch of cards and activate them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 eeeeh urrrm yes! :S This is why people say you're bad at the game. urrrm no!you seem to think so because crab helmet thinks soo, so far i have seen to sigin of independant thought from you! anyhoo, good card that isnt broken, that can only fit into chain burn, and i didnt see that top 16ing any shonen jumps of the past ever, i also have never seen a deck ever actually deck this card exept chain burn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 eeeeh urrrm yes! :S This is why people say you're bad at the game. urrrm no!you seem to think so because crab helmet thinks soo' date=' so far i have seen to sigin of independant thought from you! anyhoo, good card that isnt broken, that can only fit into chain burn, and i didnt see that top 16ing any shonen jumps of the past ever, i also have never seen a deck ever actually deck this card exept chain burn[/quote'] Did you completely miss the post I made where I stated that I got the idea from Crab Helmet, disagreed, then played against it and found out that it really is banworthy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 NO, you played against a chain burn deck!, we all know your not exactly the best player around and make ridiculous claims to whats good and bad now takign all this into consideration, dosnt it seem that your reasoning for this card beign "banworthy" is very very off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 NO' date=' you played against a chain burn deck!, we all know your not exactly the best player around and make ridiculous claims to whats good and bad now takign all this into consideration, dosnt it seem that your reasoning for this card beign "banworthy" is very very off[/quote'] How many times have I said that I'm not a good player? Honestly. Like, I know I'm not good, but that doesn't mean I don't have common sense. Playing against it isn't the only reason I think it's banworthy. I've listened to other people's reasoning(s) and formed an opinion of my own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Good goblin housekeeping' date=' Reckless, Secret Barrel, [b']RIGHT HERE I PLAY MY SOLEM JUDGMENT.[/b] Rather then taking 1000-ish damage, you decide to go for a -4000 LP? Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.