GenzoTheHarpist Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Allure being banned is ridiculous. Even though it's easy to use, that's meaningless unless it's effect is actually broken. A +0 attribute specific draw card is not broken, regardless of how common the attribute is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Allure at banned...? At worst it would be limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Allure at banned...? At worst it would be limited. Allure deserves to be at 3. It is an Attribute-specific +0. In no way broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 + The current banlist (Just the Forbidden section)- MoF- Metamorphosis + DAD+ JD+ Gorz+ CCV+ CoSR+ Breaker+ Sangan+ Monster Reborn+ Chaos Sorcerer+ CyDra+ Cyber Twin+ Cyber End+ Chimeratech OverDragon+ Chimeratech Fortress Dragon+ Snipe + Treeborn + Brain Control+ Megamorph+ United We Stand+ Return from a Diff Dim+ Limiter Removal+ Trap Dustshoot+ PoC+ X-Saber Airbellum Eh' date=' probably something else I forgot.[/quote'] @bold. No. I don't like that. Allure should be limited as well as all 3 chaos monsters. Stop failing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Now. My reason for Disk Commander at 3 is because all generic revival and all banworthy win conditions are banned. All you are stuck with for Disk Commander is theme-specific revival and weenie revival. The dedication required in a Format following this list should be more than enough to justify Disk Commander being at 3. I dunno =/. I see Zombie World PC or even just regular PC running 3 limit reverses going crazy with disk commander being at 3. I think he needs to be at 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Pika, Explain this to me:Why would Doom Lord be semi/limited?(Disregard all the cards that target it. like D-Draw and CCV)It just removes a monster for 1 turn(And they Return) And you lose your Battlephase. Explanation please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Now. My reason for Disk Commander at 3 is because all generic revival and all banworthy win conditions are banned. All you are stuck with for Disk Commander is theme-specific revival and weenie revival. The dedication required in a Format following this list should be more than enough to justify Disk Commander being at 3. I dunno =/. I see Zombie World PC or even just regular PC running 3 limit reverses going crazy with disk commander being at 3. I think he needs to be at 0. Why would you want to run 3 Limit Reverses for the sole purpose of abusing Disk Commander though? I also dont see Zombie World PC working anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Pika' date=' Explain this to me:Why would Doom Lord be semi/limited?(Disregard all the cards that target it. like D-Draw and CCV)It just removes a monster for 1 turn(And they [i']Return[/i]) And you lose your Battlephase. Explanation please? ... No one here is suggesting Doom Lord should be semi-ed or limited. I suggest you re-read what has been posted. The closest I could assume you'd be talking about is me counting decently mainable Destiny Heroes a few posts back. On the subject of Disk Commander being at 3:Dark Creator, The Creator, Light and Darkness Dragon, Zombie World, Fear Monger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted March 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2009 Allure at banned...? At worst it would be limited. Allure deserves to be at 3. It is an Attribute-specific +0. In no way broken. attribute is far to easy a requirement from what I have seen. unlike D-draw and trade-in, it requires something that is much less restrictive. in addition, the fact I could have easily thrown it into nearly any deck I've made for the past 3 years while the other two mentioned need set up, makes it's legalness questionable at best. besides, if you want it to come off or be lowered on the list, you only need to give a reason why the reason that gets is banned is not a good enough to ban it. remember, this is not me, this is what is posted, I'm just keeping track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.