Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Okay so im really confused about the effect. You can Attack all monster on the opponents side of the field when its normal summoned because it cant be special summoned but you cannot attack with a monster you just normal summoned and it goes back to your hand so is this card useless? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Okay so im really confused about the effect. You can Attack all monster on the opponents side of the field when its normal summoned because it cant be special summoned but you cannot attack with a monster you just normal summoned and it goes back to your hand so is this card useless? The effect means you can attack all monsters your opponent controls once each during the same Battle Phase. And who said you cant attack with a Monster that was just Normal Summoned unless specifically stated or unless another card prevents it from doing so? No. The card is not completely useless. It has an OTK although not really a good one as one card in the combo is not instantly searchable and is Limited. Ojama Trio + Zero Gravity / Final Attack Orders + Black Pendant + Asura Priest itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Isint that like one of the first rules of yugioh? Thus inveting special summones to avoid that rule? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Isint that like one of the first rules of yugioh? Thus inveting special summones to avoid that rule? That would be wrong. You're probably thinking of another game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Okay I have been playing yugioh sense I was 12, not to mention on the show the same turn you normal summoned you couldent attack. Hmm im so confused. Are you sure let me give you an example. So its the second turn, I have no monsters on the field and my opponent has two, I can normal summon Asura preist and attack both his monsters then it goes back to my hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Yes, that's correct. I have no idea where you're getting this normal summon = no attack thing from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Idk, I feel like such any idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordtyson Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Okay I have been playing yugioh sense I was 12' date=' not to mention on the show the same turn you normal summoned you couldent attack. Hmm im so confused. Are you sure let me give you an example.[/quote']and that is why you dont listen or watch the showall of them are noobs and cheat nonstopyugi is the worst one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 And Jaden Lucksacks. He'd never win otherwise. Lemme guess, you think face-up defense is pro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Idk' date=' I feel like such any idiot.[/quote'] That "can't attack the turn it's summoned" is a rule in Magic the Gathering called 'Summoning Sickness'. If you're used to Summoning Sickness because of MTG, you're not an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Well I know the show is retarted it terms of actual rules but it was battle city when they added the tributes in the show. I very breifly played magic so im still a fool. If the DEF question was for me im not really sure what your asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 In Duel Masters(Yes, I used to play it) Monsters couldnt attack on the first turn they were played. They called it "Summoning Sickness" >________> In Yugmimonz, You cant attack, if its the 1st turn of the duel.So I really have no idea what TC is talking about. Also:all of them are noobs and cheat nonstopNO U! Using a giant soldier made of stone, to destroy the moon, cause the tide to withdrawl, and beach all of Mako's Fish monsters, Is not cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 We can't have the name Summon Priest, but the name Asure Priest is just fine? And yes, you can attack during the same you summoned during the same turn, unless it's the 1st turn in the duel, like everybody already said in this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Using a giant soldier made of stone, to destroy the moon, cause the tide to withdrawl, and beach all of Mako's Fish monsters, Is not cheating. LMAO Omg that was amazing. I know you cant attack the first turn, I dont know what I was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 In Battle City, Fusion Monsters couldn't attack during the turn in which they were Summoned. Unless you had a card that let them. And Kaiba always did. Anyhow, this topic is now over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.