Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 I honestly dont see why more people dont use remove from play decks... now a days it's graveyard, graveyard, graveyard...I honestly think these have potential... Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 1.Lack of synchro/Tuner cards adhearing to this startegy2.Lack of really ANYthing new thats good in a while3.IMP WALL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 RFP-based Decks are just way too easy to Side against because of Imperial Iron Wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Not everyone uses imperial Iron wall, and its easy to rid the field of... oh and DD CAP/Gold Sarc + Necroface = Deck rape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Yes it but the primary card you will be using is what? oh its Heavy wich will kill your own Maro and other important back rows. Plus the other is MST wich is just one card out of 40. not good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Not everyone uses imperial Iron wall' date=' and its easy to rid the field of...[/quote'] Any good Side Deck would include Imperial Iron Wall. When you don't have enough removal to deal with them when they're sided in against you, you've basically lost the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Yes it but the primary card you will be using is what? oh its Heavy wich will kill your own Maro and other important back rows. Plus the other is MST wich is just one card out of 40. not good enough. completely bias, unless of course you top-deck your odds of drawing 3 imp walls out of 40 is no better...and who puts 3 imp iron walls in their deck anyway? unless it is of course a DD assassin deck, even then... Also, great! this is what Twister is for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 I just leav the argument to JD up there. Hes better at this convincing stuff then i am, i mean his argument beat mine by a mile... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Yes it but the primary card you will be using is what? oh its Heavy wich will kill your own Maro and other important back rows. Plus the other is MST wich is just one card out of 40. not good enough. trap eater said hi. when your opp side's they are most likely gonna side iron wall, so you side trap eater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 yes I know, and even then, your all relying on one card to stop an entire deck...wasteful... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Ok make a removal deck with al this side material, go to your next reginoal and try it out for us. Afterwards come back and write the pros and cons you expeirenced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Ok make a removal deck with al this side material' date=' go to your next reginoal and try it out for us. Afterwards come back and write the pros and cons you expeirenced.[/quote'] I already did, placed in the top 8 5th and 4th, I was running macro monach both times, only lost to black wings and I laughed at LS, and why would you side 1 trap eater...thats just dumb imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Ok make a removal deck with al this side material' date=' go to your next reginoal and try it out for us. Afterwards come back and write the pros and cons you expeirenced.[/quote'] I do not have one, but one of my friends does, except he has never been in a tourney except our fun duel tourneys in which he usually gets 2nd or 3rd because of our oldest members who each have Envoy rape-age decks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Tehere ya go. Thats your answer, just do what he did and your fine but flat out, there aare still better strategies i mean they are ok but i would rather have GB or Blackwings any day...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Tehere ya go. Thats your answer' date=' just do what he did and your fine but flat out, there aare still better strategies i mean they are ok but i would rather have GB or Blackwings any day......[/quote'] I have a gb but i've grown to dislike them because EVERY one at my locas run them, any it got boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted May 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 oh yah, GB rape D.D. any day...(no sarcasm) But the DD decks will probably get popular because of the variant Necroface in Crimsn Crisisand the fact that Gold Sarc will be comming out in the new gold series... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalflygon08 Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 I've also noticed there arn't a lot of High power monsters in DD decks, Gold Homunculus is the strongest I've faced, at least for lolATK mabye some DD beatsticks would help? and more permanent removal cards (like dimension fissure) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 removal decks are niev'd to high hell by mt destruction, which is still in abundance in this meta with breaker, best and lyla.not to mention all the general destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 RFG decks not only fall to any decently built side deck, but they also end up tripping over themselves due to their frequent horrible inconsistencies. A hand full of monsters that benefit from Macro. (Survivor, Scout Plane) A hand full of cards that cause Macro. (Dimensional Fissure, Macro Cosmos. Banisher of [blank]). A hand full of cards meant to protect your RFG-ing. (Solemn, Bribe). Heck, even getting them in a bad order (Monsters, and Defense without Macro. Macro and Defense without Monsters) can lead to game losses. tl;dr: Lol, Macro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted May 23, 2009 Report Share Posted May 23, 2009 Macro, in order for it to be a good set up, requires a ton of cards to use. In the end, it isn't even worth trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.