YCM-kun, discuss Dark Strike Fighter!

[Manjoume Thunder]

All Synchro's are either 3 or 0 cards

 

With no exception' date=' Dark Strike Fighter should be at 0

[/quote']

 

Not really. If a there is a broken OTK wich needs to copies of a Synchro and that Synchro is harmless by utself then it should be at one, but this OTK can be done with other monsters and DSF is not harmless by itself so I think that he should be at 0. And the fact that one copy can deal 4000 damage in one turn make this even more broken.

[Azuh]

All Synchro's are either 3 or 0 cards

 

With no exception' date=' Dark Strike Fighter should be at 0

[/quote']

 

Not really. If a there is a broken OTK wich needs to copies of a Synchro and that Synchro is harmless by utself then it should be at one, but this OTK can be done with other monsters and DSF is not harmless by itself so I think that he should be at 0. And the fact that one copy can deal 4000 damage in one turn make this even more broken.

 

A Synchro, even they might be damaging if 3 of them were to exsist, can most probably still effect the game while even at 1. And really, most people these days only add 1-2 of each Synchro anyways. 3 of the same Synchro is very rare, or at least some sort of Deck built around it, such as Tempest Magician etc.

[「tea.leaf」]

All Synchro's are either 3 or 0 cards

 

With no exception' date=' Dark Strike Fighter should be at 0

[/quote']

 

Not really. If a there is a broken OTK wich needs to copies of a Synchro and that Synchro is harmless by utself then it should be at one, but this OTK can be done with other monsters and DSF is not harmless by itself so I think that he should be at 0. And the fact that one copy can deal 4000 damage in one turn make this even more broken.

 

A Synchro, even they might be damaging if 3 of them were to exsist, can most probably still effect the game while even at 1. And really, most people these days only add 1-2 of each Synchro anyways. 3 of the same Synchro is very rare, or at least some sort of Deck built around it, such as Tempest Magician etc.

 

You wouldn't use Tempest Magician at three anyway.

 

Tempest Magician is a win condition, given the correct field conditions.

 

If she comes out, you win, and you only need one.

[Akira]

Yes, it should be banned for reasons already stated, but we really should get a decent generic lv7 Synchro to compensate. Before DSF, we only had BRD which is situational and other jank like Lifetrancer.

[「tea.leaf」]

You will not make fun of my favorite card. >:'[

[Akira]

You will not make fun of my favorite card. >:'[

 

The truth hurts =/

 

Art=hawt

Stats=nawt

[Exiro]

Yes' date=' it should be banned for reasons already stated, but we really should get a decent generic lv7 Synchro to compensate. Before DSF, we only had BRD which is situational and other jank like Lifetrancer.

[/quote']

 

 

How many days, weeks, months, years and aeons do I have to stay around to remind people of him?

[Akira]

Again, whilst being generic, Urbellum is weak and has a situational effect. We want something with more beef.

[cheeky leslie]

One Turn Kill. I say ban it.

[Azuh]

Again' date=' whilst being generic, Urbellum is weak and has a situational effect. We want something with [b']more beef.[/b]

 

 

Was going to do something about Mad Cow, but I cbf

[Akira]

Above card should be at 3 on any good list, it's far less broken than DSF.

[tonisanoob]

this meta 0 seems good for DSF

[「tea.leaf」]

In any meta' date=' 0 seems good for DSF.

[/quote']

 

Fixed.

[werewolfjedi]

I don't go to Tournaments/Hobby Leagues' date=' any official events, so I don't read the lists much. So I don't know all this.

 

I did say that DSF deserves a chance at 1, but if it gets out of hand, just ban it.

[/quote']

 

It's already out of hand. And most people only run 1 anyway.

 

Because you only really need 1 >____>

Once you summon it, the opponet just packs his cards up and says: "Yea, Good game :/"

 

except me, because I usually survive a dsf with just under 1000 lp.

 

but that's only because defender knight doesn't die so easily.

 

I usally get whacked the next turn after, but not always, so I keep trying.

---

on the topic of dsf, I say ban it.

 

the fact that it does so much damage by itself, much less with other monsters, makes it like broniac, but more broken since, unlike broniac, you don't leave yourself wide open for a counter attack.

 

not to menton it has a very high number of ATK points, and it is a non- requirement level 7, so cyber dragon could be used to get it out, much less the cat synchro otk.

 

easy to summon,easy to win with, would be an open and shut case in my book, but I'm not on the ban list comitte of konami fail division.

[~ P O L A R I S ~]

DSF's a win condition in of itself. A universal win condition, can be used anywhere. What's to discuss? Honestly.

 

DAD was bad, and hes only a universal win condition in DARK Decks, not to mention the fact that he's much harder to get out. Let's think about this for a sec, DAD's often a dead draw, but when you can get him out, you win. DSF can't be a dead draw, as it's basically added to your hand from the start of the duel if we're treating it as an Effect Monster, minus of course the discard-fodder capabilities and the Deck thinning. Other than that, your Extra Deck's really just an extension of your hand, waiting to be used. DAD needs to be drawn into.

 

When you get DAD OR DSF out, it's often your win. So really, DSF's just a DAD which can be requires no Deck dedication whatsoever unless we count the Tuner, but those are to a point nowadays where you'd run them even if Synchros didn't exist AND DSF's in your hand from the start of the duel no matter what.

 

If DSF was theme support, if it required specific monsters from a suffering theme, MAYBE it'd be alright, but it's not, it's still stupidly broken, ban.