Rose Dragon Cards.

[Astro Dude]

Anyone remember Akiza's Black Rose Dragon, and the War of the Roses in Yu-gi-oh Duelist of the Roses. That got me thinking, why not make these: The Rose Dragons, one red and one white. And spells for both of them:

 

Name: White Rose Dragon

Attribute: LIGHT

Type: Dragon/Synchro/Effect

ATK: 3000

DEF: 2500

Level: 8

 

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters

When this card is Synchro Summoned, you can destroy all Spell and Trap cards on the field. Once per turn, you can remove from play 1 LIGHT Attribute monster from your Graveyard to change all face-up monsters your opponent controls to Defense Position and reduce the DEF by 1000 until the End Phase.

 

Name: Thorn of Light.

Equip Spell.

 

Equip only to "White Rose Dragon" or a LIGHT Attribute monster. It gains 600 DEF. LIGHT Attribute monsters you control cannot be targeted for Spell, Trap, monster Effects or an attack. If the equipped monster battles a DARK Attribute monster, it is destroyed without Damage Calculation. An opponent's monster that battles with the equipped monster cannot be destroyed by that battle.

 

Name: Red Rose Dragon

Attribute: DARK

Type: Dragon/Synchro/Effect

ATK: 2500

DEF: 2100

Level: 7

 

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters

When this card is Synchro Summoned, you can destroy all monster cards on the field (excluding this card). Once per turn, you can remove from play 1 DARK Attribute monster from your Graveyard to change all face-up monsters your opponent controls to Attack Position and reduce the ATK by 1000 until the End Phase.

 

Name: Thorn of Darkness.

Equip Spell.

 

Equip only to "Red Rose Dragon" or a DARK Attribute monster. It gains 600 ATK and DEF. DARK Attribute monsters you control cannot be targeted for Spell, Trap, monster Effects or an attack. If the equipped monster battles a LIGHT Attribute monster, it is destroyed without Damage Calculation. An opponent's monster that battles with the equipped monster cannot be destroyed by that battle.

 

What do you guys think?

[Aesirson]

Change the effect's of the Equip spells to only equip to the attribute, sinc ethe Dragons are of that attribute it's un-needed to include them in the equipments text.

[Umbra]

Change the effect's of the Equip spells to only equip to the attribute' date=' sinc ethe Dragons are of that attribute it's un-needed to include them in the equipments text.

[/quote']

 

That, and you don't need to write "Attribute": If the word is in all-caps, it is identified as an Attribute already.

 

And the Equips are pretty much identical in all practical purposes. The cards are just mirror images of each other.

[RoseSymphony]

The Equip cards are much too broken. If you cannot see why, think about it: tons of LIGHT decks (most of them being Lightsworns) and DARK decks (again, mainly DAD decks) are played today, and those equip cards basically make those monsters indestructible (by targeting effects, at least). Do you really want the opponent's Dark Armed Dragon or Judgement Dragon to never die? Not only that, but the second effect just pushes the card over the edge, saying that any DARK or LIGHT monster is immediately destroyed if it is attacked by that monster. I would either:

 

a) Get rid of some of the effects. The boosting effect is fine, but the second effect is too much and the third effect is just excessive.

 

b) Make two or three seperate Equip Cards using said effects.

 

The monsters are fine, but the overall creativity of them is questionable.

[Bringerofcake]

The Equip cards are much too broken. If you cannot see why' date=' think about it: tons of LIGHT decks (most of them being Lightsworns) and DARK decks (again, mainly DAD decks) are played today, and those equip cards basically make those monsters indestructible (by targeting effects, at least). Do you really want the opponent's Dark Armed Dragon or Judgement Dragon to never die? Not only that, but the second effect just pushes the card over the edge, saying that any DARK or LIGHT monster is immediately destroyed if it is attacked by that monster. I would either:

 

a) Get rid of some of the effects. The boosting effect is fine, but the second effect is too much and the third effect is just excessive.

 

b) Make two or three seperate Equip Cards using said effects.

 

The monsters are fine, but the overall creativity of them is questionable.

[/quote']

 

That, or make an archetype surrounding the two dragons, and make the equip cards equipable only to that archetype or the dragons ("Equip only to a 'White Rose' monster"?)

That being said, you should make the ONLY the equipped monster un-targetable. This makes them a little less broken.

[Astro Dude]

I already did the cards. I just need pictures. The Red Rose Dragon has the same ATK and DEF as Dark Magician because the dragon would represent Yugi, who was the Red Rose leader in Duelist of the Roses. The same can be said about the White Rose Dragon representing Kaiba as the leader of the White Rose clan.

 

Also, what should I call the cards with the second and third efects?