Toffee. Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Why Cloak and Dagger was even sensored, is beyond me.[align=center]Destroy all face-up Warrior-Type monsters on the field.[/align] Its a generic type-hater(I guess?) Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 You've gotta be kidding. They made THIS into a Gold Series card? Waste of trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Its more like a neck shot really.It was good @ some point in time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Let's replace "Warrior-type" with "DARK" or "LIGHT". Would this card be better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Let's replace "Warrior-type" with "DARK" or "LIGHT". Would this card be better? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Fish Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Slightly... Good for a side-deck? I don't see many warriors running around, though. Try dragons or fiends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Slightly... Good for a side-deck? I don't see many warriors running around' date=' though. [b']Try [...] fiends.[/b] Also a Gold Series card. These cards are sideable at best, just as long as your deck actually sees these types as threats somehow. They aren't very useful though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeREVOLUTION Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Its good in a anti-warrior deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 I seem to remember that, when people actually did side against Warriors, Kinetic Soldier was invariably chosen over this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendo Fish Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Let's replace "Warrior-type" with "DARK" or "LIGHT". Would this card be better? Slightly... Good for a side-deck? I don't see many warriors running around' date=' though. [b']Try [...] fiends.[/b] Also a Gold Series card. These cards are sideable at best, just as long as your deck actually sees these types as threats somehow. They aren't very useful though.Now let's see a Dragon-destroying Gold series card!*404 not found*They don't have one? Weird, at least to me. They're still alright for a side deck, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 aww I was expecting Snipe Hunter. Anyway toilet paper at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterr259 Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Its more like a neck shot really.It was good @ some point in time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Its good in a anti-warrior deck. LOLYCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Its good in a anti-warrior deck. LOLYCM Duh! Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Dear god this is toatally not even worth running. I assume it was good at one point in time but "Koa'Ki Meiru" just make this card look like a napkin. I guess it'd be good up against an E-Hero deck, but if anything it's only sideable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolTama Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Warriors (even 6 Sams) aren't big enough of a threat to waste deck space for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 TF2 :3 That line does get overused thoanother field-file for a specific type like Spellcaster or Fiend or Insects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsuki ni Mau Majin Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Title is a Youtube reference. >_> Oh, and the topic card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 I seem to remember that' date=' when people actually did side against Warriors, Kinetic Soldier was invariably chosen over this.[/quote'] I was going to mention something about this. Kinetic Soldier is the bomb =] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Kick Guile Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Useless card is useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snitch Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Useless card is useless. Useless post is useless. On-topic, crappy card. Let's try: "Destroy all face-up monsters on the field your opponent controls except for 1 which they choose." AHAHAHHAHA. Lolycm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 aww I was expecting Snipe Hunter. Anyway toilet paper is better.Fixd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.