GenzoTheHarpist Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 You say that like helping glads is a reason for a card to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted August 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Snip Huh, I have absolutely no way to back out of that :/ It's true, entirely, though. I don't know what would make me so drastically assume I have a right to my arrogance; and that other people should naturally know about 3 or 0. Sheer uneducation, I guess. Well, I realize now. Sorry for wasting time with this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 To be fair, that last comment Yubel made shows that they probably are indeed idiots. Go bash them based on that instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecoboy1324 Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 lolTo even check those sights out is fail. Shame on you all. Wrath of God this thread./topic Damnation is better IMO OT: TL;DR but from what I've skimmed through this is my response. 3/0 logic has its fails (Stratos Night Assailant) when cards that interact with other are still in our card pool. However a semi limit list is kind of redundant as you only change the odds of drawing it at a moment 1/40 compared to running it in 3's So it isn't even worth it to even have a semi limit and the list should go 3/1/0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 lolTo even check those sights out is fail. Shame on you all. Wrath of God this thread./topic Damnation is better IMO OT: TL;DR but from what I've skimmed through this is my response. 3/0 logic has its fails (Stratos Night Assailant) when cards that interact with other are still in our card pool. However a semi limit list is kind of redundant as you only change the odds of drawing it at a moment 1/40 compared to running it in 3's So it isn't even worth it to even have a semi limit and the list should go 3/1/0 Although that would make the most sense, where would Malicious go? Would he go back up to 3 or would he go to 1/0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 lolTo even check those sights out is fail. Shame on you all. Wrath of God this thread./topic The fact that you spelled "sites" wrong really does make this all the more humorous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 lolTo even check those sights out is fail. Shame on you all. Wrath of God this thread./topic Damnation is better IMO OT: TL;DR but from what I've skimmed through this is my response. 3/0 logic has its fails (Stratos Night Assailant) when cards that interact with other are still in our card pool. However a semi limit list is kind of redundant as you only change the odds of drawing it at a moment 1/40 compared to running it in 3's So it isn't even worth it to even have a semi limit and the list should go 3/1/0 There are cards that could potentially go to 2 under 3/0 logic as well' date=' for the same reason that there are cards that belong at 1. For example, if it were decided that Thunder Dragon's +1 were bad for the game, it would naturally be sent to 2. If it were decided that Malicious turning into two pieces of fodder is unacceptable but turning into one piece would be fine - which is possible, since a +2 is obviously very different from a put at 2 on a 3/0 list is Card Trooper - Card Trooper + Machine Duplication is a problem with Card Trooper at 3, but at 2 it only fields 3800 ATK and is a +0 (albeit with floating) rather than 5700 with a +1 (and with even more floating). What are you going to do now, adopt a banlist theory called 3/2/1/0? Unless you're talking to a few Knights Templar on Pojo who want to completely do away with the Limited and Semi-Limited sections because they think they look inelegant, 3/0 isn't called 3/0 because it puts all cards at 3 or 0; it's called 3/0 not only because [i']most[/i] cards go to either 3 or 0 but also because it has a general philosophy of completely outlawing problems and putting no restrictions on non-problems, and that dichotomy between complete elimination and a lack of restrictions is best represented by the numbers 3 and 0. Renaming it "3/1/0" - or worse, "3/2/1/0" - because of the handful of exceptions would not only be utterly ridiculous but also undermine the underlying philosophy of "kill problems and ignore everything else". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalie12 Posted February 7, 2010 Report Share Posted February 7, 2010 To be fair' date=' that last comment Yubel made shows that they probably are indeed idiots. Go bash them based on that instead.[/quote'] Feel like getting smashed by the other 50% decent playerbase? Truth sucks at this game, Yubel is a mediocre 12 y'old kid, Donnie is a troll , SephKirby is from pojo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 7, 2010 Report Share Posted February 7, 2010 To be fair' date=' that last comment Yubel made shows that they probably are indeed idiots. Go bash them based on that instead.[/quote'] Feel like getting smashed by the other 50% decent playerbase? Truth sucks at this game, Yubel is a mediocre 12 y'old kid, Donnie is a troll , SephKirby is from pojo. Congratulations on reviving a topic that has been dead for half a year in order to say... nothing of particular importance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.