LightSabers aren't just for Jedi anymore

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

LightSabers [41]

 

Monsters: [21]

 

1| Card Trooper

1| Jain, Lightsworn Paladin

3| Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress

1| Morphing Jar

1| Plaguespreader Zombie

1| Rescue Cat

2| Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter

1| Wulf, Lightsworn Beast

3| X-Saber Airbellum

2| XX-Saber Faultroll

3| XX-Saber Fulhelmknight

2| XX-Saber Ragigura

 

Spells: [14]

 

3| Charge of the Light Brigade

2| Foolish Burial

1| Giant Trunade

1| Heavy Storm

1| Mystical Space Typhoon

1| Pot of Avarice

1| Reinforcement of the Army

3| Solar Recharge

 

Traps: [6]

 

3| Gottoms' Emergency Call

1| Mirror Force

2| Threatening Roar

1| Torrential Tribute

 

Extra Deck:

 

2| Ally of Justice Catastor

1| Black Rose Dragon

3| Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier

1| Goyo Guardian

1| Magical Android

1| Mist Wurm

2| Stardust Dragon

1| Thought Ruler Archfiend

3| XX-Saber Gottoms

 

Side Deck:

 

3| Lightsworn Sabre

 

cwutididthar?

 

---

There is a high chance that I am doing it wrong, but I haven't tried X-Sabers yet, so I thought I would give them a shot.

[Toffee.]

This deck should run that Lightsworn Saber.

For teh lulz

[.Nu-13]

1. It's "SaberSworns"

2. maybe

-1 Wulf

+1 Lyla

 

Wulf is a dead draw in most cases, so 3 lylas are better

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

This deck should run that Lightsworn Saber.

For teh lulz

 

Just fyi' date=' it's called Lightsworn Saber X3

 

Side Decked[hr']

1. It's "SaberSworns"

2. maybe

-1 Wulf

+1 Lyla

 

Wulf is a dead draw in most cases' date=' so 3 lylas are better

[/quote']

 

How is calling it LightSabers incorrect? I'm running LIGHT monster with X-Sabers, therefore, I can call it LightSabers. Sure the LIGHT monsters are LS, but that is a minor detail.

 

Edit: Also, lolwikia in the X-Sabers page says that SaberSworn isn't an official name, besides, if I called them SaberSworns my title wouldn't work :P

 

Will do the change

[Toffee.]

This deck should run that Lightsworn Saber.

For teh lulz

 

Just fyi' date=' it's called Lightsworn Saber X3

 

Side Decked[/quote']

But it cant be a LightSaber deck, unless you legitly run at least 1 Light Saber D:

 

Either that, Or im crazy enough to make a deck of Lightsworn Warriors, and then also include Light Laser >_____>

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

This deck should run that Lightsworn Saber.

For teh lulz

 

 

Just fyi' date=' it's called Lightsworn Saber X3

 

Side Decked[/quote']

But it cant be a LightSaber deck, unless you legitly run at least 1 Light Saber D:

 

Either that, Or im crazy enough to make a deck of Lightsworn Warriors, and then also include Light Laser >_____>

 

 

1. It's "SaberSworns"

 

 

How is calling it LightSabers incorrect? I'm running LIGHT monster with X-Sabers' date=' therefore, I can call it LightSabers. Sure the LIGHT monsters are LS, but that is a minor detail.

 

Edit: Also, lolwikia in the X-Sabers page says that SaberSworn isn't an official name, besides, if I called them SaberSworns my title wouldn't work :P[/quote']

 

I explained that, but I get what you mean, though side decking is legitly running it.

[.Leo]

Should be called "X-Sworns"

 

Card Trooper looks good in this build. Nice job :D

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Should be called "X-Sworns"

 

Card Trooper looks good in this build. Nice job :D

 

*gives credit to lolwikia, then double takes* Wait, what?

 

But seriously, lolwikia was a huge help for this deck, and it's called "LightSabers" because it works for the title, not to mention it's A FLIPPEN SWORD OF LIGHT! I mean come on!

[werewolfjedi]

it doesn't feel right, it looks like your running lightsworn just for charge and recharge.

 

and x-sabers are better when they actually come to the field and then come back, relying on the come back only will strain the deck, and you have signifigant milling in this deck.

 

I would run 3 gottems call in this, since your mill is the uncontroled lightsworn kind. ether that, or something to grab out of the grave into hand at least.

 

also, I don't remember all of their names exactly, but is one of the your x-sabers that frog that comes back from the grave? he might help out a bit in a deck like this.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

also' date=' I don't remember all of their names exactly, but is one of the your x-sabers that frog that comes back from the grave? he might help out a bit in a deck like this.

[/quote']

 

Ragigura, the one that when it is summoned you return an X-Saber from the grave to your hand, is in 2.

 

I'm going to test before I change much, mainly because I need to see if this has any hidden synergy. For later reference, what should I remove for a 3rd Gottem's Call?

[werewolfjedi]

also' date=' I don't remember all of their names exactly, but is one of the your x-sabers that frog that comes back from the grave? he might help out a bit in a deck like this.

[/quote']

 

Ragigura, the one that when it is summoned you return an X-Saber from the grave to your hand, is in 2.

 

I'm going to test before I change much, mainly because I need to see if this has any hidden synergy. For later reference, what should I remove for a 3rd Gottem's Call?

 

I personally would remove rota, but that's just personal prefrence.

perhaps saber slash? though I don't exactly remember what it does.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

also' date=' I don't remember all of their names exactly, but is one of the your x-sabers that frog that comes back from the grave? he might help out a bit in a deck like this.

[/quote']

 

Ragigura, the one that when it is summoned you return an X-Saber from the grave to your hand, is in 2.

 

I'm going to test before I change much, mainly because I need to see if this has any hidden synergy. For later reference, what should I remove for a 3rd Gottem's Call?

 

I personally would remove rota, but that's just personal prefrence.

perhaps saber slash? though I don't exactly remember what it does.

 

Saber Slash, Destroy a number of face-up cards on the field equal to the number of face-up Attack Position "X-Saber" monsters you control.

 

It's just a tech, thought it would be good vs. most of the meta today since they swarm like crazy

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

K, I took out RotA for a third G Call, Saber Slash has proven too useful to neg

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

This deck is testing out much smoother than I had anticipated, I think we have a winner :D

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Bump