-Deadpool- Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 look 2 things 1 nice pics but too OP`d and obelisk is legal if u want proof go and get a shonen jump this december it has an obelisk card (legal) inside of it i give the cards a 5/10 for pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 It's a friggin powerful card, but hey, if you allow 3 monsters to be Tributed to summon Obeslisk, it's your own fault..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Obelisk isn't banworthy. dude' date=' they will ban it soon. i just know it.[/quote']A good player will know that to be untrue. Good players will agree with me. so you're saying they're going to allow a too f--king OPed monster that negates the effects of spells, traps and monsters (like an all around version of jinzo), can only be destroyed in battle (with barely any monsters that have an ATK of 4050 or higher, including obelisk's effect that you can't support your monsters so they can't get ATK gain), that can offer two monsters to destroy all monsters on your opponent's side, let alone cannot have his summon negated, even with the very few drawbacks on the card in a tournament?? you're telling me this card isn't banworthy?? that's messed up. If it was banworthy, wouldn't people be using it right now?Nope, they're using their crapsworns and judgment dragon.What does that tell you?Oh yea, they're making a legal Winged Dragon of Ra, too. ON-topic: some are op'ed, some are up'ed 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoAreYou? Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 And you're ignoring the facts. Obelisk is not banworthy. how am i ignoring the facts when i mentioned them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worin Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Nein!, NI!, NAY!, and No..Very OP'ed and it would be banned in like the 7 days of release....2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Home Slice Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 really hard to summon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worin Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Ya! This cards will not be here un 7 days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Lol worgen you fail hardly... When we mean banned we mean we cant use it in contest and such, not remove this thread. Remains 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser 569 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 I like the last one . Pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 And you're ignoring the facts. Obelisk is not banworthy. how am i ignoring the facts when i mentioned them?You're not mentioning facts. You're evidently a low-tier duelist who gets whooped at locals by low-tier decks, so of course you're afraid of Obelisk and think it should be banned. Stop whining. Obelisk isn't good enough to be banned. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorrow. Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 And you're ignoring the facts. Obelisk is not banworthy. how am i ignoring the facts when i mentioned them?You're not mentioning facts. You're evidently a low-tier duelist who gets whooped at locals by low-tier decks' date=' so of course you're afraid of Obelisk and think it should be banned. Stop whining. Obelisk isn't good enough to be banned. Period.[/quote'] Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Deadpool- Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 agreed here 2 and nice avi AzNLycaN 1 comment deadpool is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathstickeR Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 have a card with teh firt monester's pic and wayyyy more insane effect:This card can not be normal summoned or set. This card can only be summoned by the effect of a special summon. When Apocalypse Shaman is summoned,remove from play all cards on your oppenent's side of the field and graveyard. This card gains 500 ATK from each card removed from play.For every LIGHT monster removed from play,this card get an additional 1000 ATK.This card cannot be the target of spells,traps,or abilities and can't be destroyed. Damage calcualtion is applied normally. This card negates the effects of Narrow Pass and Ojama Knight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 Obelisk isn't banworthy. dude' date=' they will ban it soon. i just know it.[/quote']A good player will know that to be untrue. Good players will agree with me. Yes because New Obelisk is downright balanced compared to Dark Simorgh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rehtua Posted December 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 OK OK JESUS IVE MODIFIED THE ORIGIONAL VERSIONS THAT I HAVE TO WHERE THEY'RE EFFECTS STILL ARE AWSOME BUT SUMMONING THEM TO THE FIELD BALANCES THEM OUT.and wow...never thought id see this many posts on my form...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~RoBoTiClOvEr~ Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 Actually' date=' I think only the first and second are worth summoning. The others I'd say are UP. The pics are sort of nice i guess. 7/10[/quote'] I agree with this postB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 I think you deserve my honesty. That was a terrible OCG fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoAreYou? Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Obelisk isn't banworthy. dude' date=' they will ban it soon. i just know it.[/quote']A good player will know that to be untrue. Good players will agree with me. Yes because New Obelisk is downright balanced compared to Dark Simorgh. "New" Obelisk? Both cards have the same effect, the blue version (w/e the hell it's called) and the Shonen Jump version. The blue version along with the other god cards are banned because they have no effects descripted in their card texts, the Shonen Jump version should be AT LEAST limited to 1 or 2 per deck. Last Sunday (Dec 13), I was in a small tournament with the advanced rules (banned/limited cards blahblahblah), and I faced this guy who had 3 Obelisks and was able to pull all three out in one turn. Yes, he won. No, I didn't prevent him from attacking because I CAN'T F--KING ACTIVATE TRAP CARDS AFTER HE'S BEEN SUMMONED!! >=( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Anyone who says Obelisk is OPed is retarded and shouldn't play Yu-Gi-Oh EVER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I nodded my head while giggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSeer Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Way to go, dude! Hate to disagree with the crowd, but these cards would never get banned just because of their awesomeness! 100/10!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Perfect logic. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Riku~ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 I was completely amazed by the second one. It is stronger than Silfer! No' date=' people, read it's effect. READ IT. Makes you faint, ah?[/quote'] Indeed it is. What the hell is up with that? It gains big ATK as soon as it hits the field, and every time it destroys a monster, it gains more ATK, giving it the capability to destroy even MORE monsters. It's a nearly endless cycle of ATK and that card would be banned within a month after its release (if they ever released it, which they wouldn't because, you know, it's kind of... fake.)And also...Way to go' date=' dude! Hate to disagree with the crowd, but these cards would never get banned just because of their awesomeness! 100/10!!![/quote'] Yeaaaahhhh, reeeeaaaaly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMZ Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Way to go' date=' dude! Hate to disagree with the crowd, but these cards would never get banned just because of their awesomeness! 100/10!!![/quote'] Yup, indeed. Guys, bring in the truck with the AWESOME cards, they are un-banned now. * nods looking at Dark Hole* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.