Jump to content

BEHOLD THE CLOSEST TO GOD CARDS WITHOUT BEING BANNED!!!


rehtua

Recommended Posts

OK! ENOUGH WE HAVE GONE FROM MY CARDS' date=' TO OBELISK, TO SPELLING! I can spell just fine! My point was that if its not something important like school, a job interview, ect... then I don't wanna have to waste extra time spelling correctly when I can just shorten.

[/quote']

 

hey if you're getting pissed, you should probably ask a mod to do something about it. just saying.

and YESSSSSS 100th COMMENT!!! XD ok i'm in trouble now o__o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Obelisk isn't banworthy.

 

dude' date=' they will ban it soon. i just know it.

[/quote']A good player will know that to be untrue.

 

Good players will agree with me.

 

so you're saying they're going to allow a too f--king OPed monster that negates the effects of spells, traps and monsters (like an all around version of jinzo), can only be destroyed in battle (with barely any monsters that have an ATK of 4050 or higher, including obelisk's effect that you can't support your monsters so they can't get ATK gain), that can offer two monsters to destroy all monsters on your opponent's side, let alone cannot have his summon negated, even with the very few drawbacks on the card in a tournament?? you're telling me this card isn't banworthy?? that's messed up.

 

If it was banworthy, wouldn't people be using it right now?

Nope, they're using their crapsworns and judgment dragon.

What does that tell you?

Oh yea, they're making a legal Winged Dragon of Ra, too.

 

ON-topic: some are op'ed, some are up'ed 5/10

 

people are using them there called noobs :) + obelisk isn't that hard to get rid of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obelisk isn't banworthy.

 

dude' date=' they will ban it soon. i just know it.

[/quote']A good player will know that to be untrue.

 

Good players will agree with me.

 

so you're saying they're going to allow a too f--king OPed monster that negates the effects of spells, traps and monsters (like an all around version of jinzo), can only be destroyed in battle (with barely any monsters that have an ATK of 4050 or higher, including obelisk's effect that you can't support your monsters so they can't get ATK gain), that can offer two monsters to destroy all monsters on your opponent's side, let alone cannot have his summon negated, even with the very few drawbacks on the card in a tournament?? you're telling me this card isn't banworthy?? that's messed up.

 

If it was banworthy, wouldn't people be using it right now?

Nope, they're using their crapsworns and judgment dragon.

What does that tell you?

Oh yea, they're making a legal Winged Dragon of Ra, too.

 

ON-topic: some are op'ed, some are up'ed 5/10

 

people are using them there called noobs :) + obelisk isn't that hard to get rid of

 

just so you know, we already finished our argument about obelisk, the sucky cards that this guy made (no offense to him) and spelling. Now it's about locking this thread. LET'S NOT REPLY FOR 10 DAYS AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS =D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...