~Riku~ Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Perhaps you could put these remarkable images in your YCMArchive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted December 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I will. Soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted January 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 5 more cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 The ATK bosting of Garkago is too OPed! 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mackeyz Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 good card and good effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted January 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 The ATK bosting of Garkago is too OPed! 8/10 By that logic, White-Horned Dragon is worse, since it can reach 3700 on it's own. But we all know WHD isn't good in any deck, so saying Garkago, who is a weenie on his own, is OPed is just nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 The ATK bosting of Garkago is too OPed! 8/10 By that logic' date=' White-Horned Dragon is worse, since it can reach 3700 on it's own. But we all know WHD isn't good in any deck, so saying Garkago, who is a weenie on his own, is OPed is just nonsense.[/quote'] With 1 monster Garkago reach the 3200, and the WHD needs the 5 cards to have that ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted January 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 In terms of playability, WHD is a 2 and Garkago is a 2.4. But that's just a pro talking, here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.