~Wright~ Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 When's the last time you've seen that title... =p I tried this before and it didn't work so well, here's my second try. :D[spoiler=Lore]This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand, and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack, except by discarding 1 monster. Changes made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aa'une Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dude it is still OP'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 ZOMG! ZEONARK! THAT'S ME! *Shot* This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand' date=' and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack, except by discarding 1 card. This card inflicts piercing damage.[/quote'] Looks like if you're not soloing a card on the field and discarding alot, this card's ATK is going to drop, FAST. I liek it. Nice picture. Original effect from what I've seen. Decently balanced too. =P 9.5/10.5 just because. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Superoverpowered, dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Wright~ Posted December 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dude it is still OP'd.Should I increase the cost to discarding a monster? ZOMG! ZEONARK! THAT'S ME! *Shot*Best name I could think of' date=' lol! :D[/b']This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand' date=' and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack, except by discarding 1 card. This card inflicts piercing damage.[/quote']Thanks, I'll fix that. :DLooks like if you're not soloing a card on the field and discarding alot, this card's ATK is going to drop, FAST. I liek it. Nice picture. Original effect from what I've seen. Decently balanced too. =P 9.5/10.5 just because. Lol.Thanks. :D Superoverpowered' date=' dude.[b']I'm thinking of increasing the cost to discarding a certain type of card.... should I make it monster, spell, or trap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aa'une Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 1 monster and 1 spell or trap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack, except by decreasing its ATK by 300. You can halve the ATK of this card until the end of the Battle Phase, to have this card attack you opponent directly. Fixed OCG and added restrictions though it might still be OPed 7/10 for tryingit's not a bad card, just so you know but next time don't make it 3000 ATK for Level 4 or give longer effect which balances it out, I did that once and it was failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Its not called percing damage. get it right and then I'll rate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 actually, piercing damage is accepted though bit old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 even then it's still OPed I'd remove the piercing damage effect all together 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darklord33 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 still overpowered.OCG: This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack unless you discard 1 card from your hand. During battle between this attacking card and a defense position monster whose DEF is lower than this cards ATK inflict the difference as battle damage to your opponent. here's a suggestion: This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this cards ATK by 500 for each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack unless you discard 1 card from your hand. During battle between this attacking card and a defense position monster whose DEF is lower than this cards ATK inflict the difference as battle damage to your opponent. If this card inflicts battle damage to your opponent you take half the damage your opponent took. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 It's still OP...The decrease ATK effect is to small...The discart 1 card is fine...Piercing damage is OPRemove the piercing damage and it will be fine, or change the ATK decrease to 300.OCG is fine and pic is cool!It's OP but i'll still rate it:9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Wright~ Posted January 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 changes made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I think now it seems balanced...9.5/10 now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domi the Mystery Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Hmmm... If he is the only card you control, and you have 1 card in your hand which you discard to attack... Its 2900 ATK. Ithinkyoushouldmakeanormalcardinsteadofmakingmagiccardswhich...Fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 No piercing damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Yeah remove the piercing from the card, you just removed from the lore... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 ocg is wrong its not piercing damage, This is still op'd and makes for a strong level 4 monster. i think you should raise it a level 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 The thing is, this card is a powerhouse but only if you're topdecking, which is generally discouraged in Yu-Gi-Oh. This would combo well with Infernity. Drop the piercing damage (from the card) and it's actually very much balanced. 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. Decrease this card's ATK by 100 for each card in your hand and each card you control. This card cannot declare an attack' date=' except by decreasing its ATK by 300. You can halve the ATK of this card until the end of the Battle Phase, to have this card attack you opponent directly. Fixed OCG and added restrictions though it might still be OPed 7/10 for tryingit's not a bad card, just so you know but next time don't make it 3000 ATK for Level 4 or give longer effect which balances it out, I did that once and it was failed[/quote'] Piercing Damage is when you attack a Defense Position monster and still do damage, not when you attack directly =/ Anyways...@Card:If you want to make it balanced, make it loose 200 and not 100. Also, remove the piercing.. Piercing damage has never been accepted (maybe you played Magic or something and that's where it comes from, I don't know). Here's an OCG fix without any suggestion yet:This card is also treated as a Warrior-Type monster. This card looses 100 ATK for each card on your hand and on your side of the field. This card cannot declare an attack' date=' except by discarding 1 monster. [b']During the battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than this card's ATK, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.[/b] After suggestions above the OCG fix have been done, it will be Balanced. Its sort of like a Beast King Barbaros that can actually be searched... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 It is still OPed since it can have 2400 easily though more balanced now than before 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie17 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 its kinda good, still might require some more balancing to be a level 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.