-Griffin Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 [quote='Manjoume Thunder' pid='3586463' dateline='1262450478'] [quote='Dark Armed Duelist' pid='3586419' dateline='1262449651'] [quote='Manjoume Thunder' pid='3586346' dateline='1262448133'] [quote='Xander Royce' pid='3586330' dateline='1262447868'] [quote='Qal'at' pid='3586320' dateline='1262447763'] Guys, he's not limitable. :\ they only semi'd him because of the FTK. [/quote] What was the FTK with him anyways? [/quote] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kuk-4sMkOM [/quote] Dark Strike Fighter So yeah... why is Dewloren semi'd again? [/quote] To prevent future attempts of creating FTKs with this loop. [/quote] And because almost no-one would Summon more than 2 without intent to OTK/FTK, so no Deck was hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Guys' date=' he's not limitable. :\ they only semi'd him because of the FTK.[/quote'] What was the FTK with him anyways? ... That looks painfully inconsistent. But I digress. Even if that ridiculously long combo were somehow made consistent enough to be a viable threat in the meta, why would Dewloren be banned or limited, when semi seems like a much better place for it? Secondly, why is it assumed Dewloren is the problem, when it could just as easily be Symbol of Heritage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Guys' date=' he's not limitable. :\ they only semi'd him because of the FTK.[/quote'] What was the FTK with him anyways? ... That looks painfully inconsistent. But I digress. Even if that ridiculously long combo were somehow made consistent enough to be a viable threat in the meta, why would Dewloren be banned or limited, when semi seems like a much better place for it? Secondly, why is it assumed Dewloren is the problem, when it could just as easily be Symbol of Heritage? Only the 3rd Dewloren is the problem. Who would use 3 Dewloren except for this OTK? Keeping Symbol of Heritage contributes more to the game than the third Dewloren does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Guys' date=' he's not limitable. :\ they only semi'd him because of the FTK.[/quote'] What was the FTK with him anyways? ... That looks painfully inconsistent. But I digress. Even if that ridiculously long combo were somehow made consistent enough to be a viable threat in the meta, why would Dewloren be banned or limited, when semi seems like a much better place for it? Secondly, why is it assumed Dewloren is the problem, when it could just as easily be Symbol of Heritage? It's assumed because that solves the problem with a semi rather than a ban. Which keeps the card pool larger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Guys' date=' he's not limitable. :\ they only semi'd him because of the FTK.[/quote'] What was the FTK with him anyways? ... That looks painfully inconsistent. But I digress. Even if that ridiculously long combo were somehow made consistent enough to be a viable threat in the meta, why would Dewloren be banned or limited, when semi seems like a much better place for it? Secondly, why is it assumed Dewloren is the problem, when it could just as easily be Symbol of Heritage? Genzo explained why Dewloren being Semi'd made more sense, now as for consistency... It was a 4-card combo that had every card at 3 at the time, and had a search card that could find 3 of said 4 cards, and that was also @ 3. FishborgLuriSubstitoadSymbol of Heritage Fishborg can be sent by Foolish or any card that discards from hand or deck. Luri may be best in your hand, but all 3 are searchable by One for One and have less than 1500 ATK. Symbol of Heritage can be found by Hidden Armory if you make sure that everything gets Special Summoned (you can pull this off without Normal Summoning), and you even have a slim chance of discarding Fishborg, causing you to not even need Foolish. It's easy as pie to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 it looked like fishborg was the real key to the thing until tiger started looping. this is a dangerous thing, it need to be semi limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 well, DSF is banned and Dewloren is at 2. this combo wont be a major threat anymore. Symbol wont work because you need 3 with same name. 2 dewloren doesnt work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 well' date=' DSF is banned and Dewloren is at 2. this combo wont be a major threat anymore. Symbol wont work because you need 3 with same name. 2 dewloren doesnt work.[/quote'] mass driver, slower, but just as effective. plus, an infininte loop is never something that should be allowed, personally, I want morale boost banned just to stop the flink lock loop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Is the returning a cost? Could make for a fun SkillDrain Deck. its not a cost. The card is good, a trunade for monsters was well over due, but its limitation to only face ups is annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 well' date=' DSF is banned and Dewloren is at 2. this combo wont be a major threat anymore. Symbol wont work because you need 3 with same name. 2 dewloren doesnt work.[/quote'] mass driver, slower, but just as effective. plus, an infininte loop is never something that should be allowed, personally, I want morale boost banned just to stop the flink lock loop. Just limit flint lock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 It's already limited in Japan. All he needs to be is limited. He's an OKAY card. Now, maybe bannable if he were as spashable as Brio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Brio is splashable because he's bannable. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.