-Griffin Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 I personally agree with 0 Heavy 3 MST = awful format logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I personally agree with 0 Heavy 3 MST = awful format logic. I would prefer it, if mst wasn't a quick-play. that quick-play part breaks the card and allows for unfair uses. I think they should ban BOTH and make a new spell card that is 1 for 1 s/t removal without extra cost that is a normal spell. then that problem would not exist. disspellnormal spell.: destroy one spell or trap on the field. I think everyone would agree that it would be a better card at 3 than both at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I personally agree with 0 Heavy 3 MST = awful format logic. I would prefer it' date=' if mst wasn't a quick-play. that quick-play part breaks the card and allows for unfair uses. I think they should ban BOTH and make a new spell card that is 1 for 1 s/t removal without extra cost that is a normal spell. then that problem would not exist. disspellnormal spell.: destroy one spell or trap on the field. I think everyone would agree that it would be a better card at 3 than both at 1.[/quote'] If you understood why Heavy Storm is not banned, you would understand why this card is a horrible replacement for Storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 I personally agree with 0 Heavy 3 MST = awful format logic. I would prefer it' date=' if mst wasn't a quick-play. that quick-play part breaks the card and allows for unfair uses. I think they should ban BOTH and make a new spell card that is 1 for 1 s/t removal without extra cost that is a normal spell. then that problem would not exist. disspellnormal spell.: destroy one spell or trap on the field. I think everyone would agree that it would be a better card at 3 than both at 1.[/quote'] If you understood why Heavy Storm is not banned, then you will understand why this card is a horrible replacement for Storm. I understand the overextention argument, you don't need to bring it up.and personaly, I sit on the heavy isn't needed side of the fence, though it is because I feel that heavy promotes otking more than stops over-extention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morfowt Posted January 24, 2010 Report Share Posted January 24, 2010 disspellnormal spell.: destroy one spell or trap on the field. I think everyone would agree that it would be a better card at 3 than both at 1.I'd like it but then I just don't like heavy storm because it destroys my spell and traps too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.