Jump to content

[JG] Yeah... He's insane... Like the weather in Denmark... [JG]


JG.

Recommended Posts

[align=center]EN012-NirvanatheEnraged.jpg

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned when you take 2000 or more damage from a card effect. During your Battle Phase, this card must attack all monsters your opponent controls. Each time this card destroys a monster, place 1 Rage Counter on this card (Max. 3). When there are 3 Rage Counters on this card, destroy it and inflict damage to your Life Points equal to the total Level of all monsters destroyed by this card x100.

 

No, srsly. I was close to slipping and breaking a leg or two today. It's insanly slippery, since we're in the sub-zero region, and it was raining all last night... >.<[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The weather in Swe sucks as well, snowstorm and -30

 

Well for the card, unique Summoning effect and it's hard to Summon (you can inflict damage to yourself to Summon it though) but 2000 is alot so it's costly.

The Rage Counter effect is balanced since it MUST attack all monsters, not possibly 3 but 2. It will eventually destroy 3 and is therefor destroyed itself. But you should lower the ATK of it (if your opponent has 3 Blue Eyes and this destroys all of them:

 

(4000-3000) x 3 = 3000 Life Points for destroying them,

and another 24 x 200 Life Points for their Level, which makes it 4800 + 3000 = 7800!?)

 

Now I made it attack one ogf the strongest monsteres, but still

 

But if it attacks a monster int Defence Position, its high ATK wont do any damage

 

You can lower the ATK to 3500ish to make it little more balanced

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, sorry I misread, I read to your opponent :/

Then it is more balanced but if you lose LP due to this card destroying monsters, you can just use a Spell that cuts your LPs in half and attack directly or attack all you opponents monsters if they are low-Leveled and have low ATK but it balances it out

But to summon it you need to give up 2000 Life Points + you lose like 200 x at least 3 = 600 2000+ 600 =2600

you need to lose 2600 LPs to destroy your opponent's monsters (can be worth it but it can also make you lose the duel)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i know about Denmark i'd say that it's always a sub-zero area.

 

Not in the mood to correct' date=' it's been stated anyway.

[/quote']

 

1.) AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Lrn2research. Summertime gets up to 30 celcius, sub-zero is only in winter. But then it's also around -5-10 usually.

2.) Then don't post, idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JoshIcy

From what i know about Denmark i'd say that it's always a sub-zero area.

 

Not in the mood to correct' date=' it's been stated anyway.

[/quote']

 

1.) AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Lrn2research. Summertime gets up to 30 celcius, sub-zero is only in winter. But then it's also around -5-10 usually.

2.) Then don't post, idiot.

 

First laugh was warranted, though a little direct.

Second was outright cold *lol doublepun?*

 

Instead you can ask him to talk about the idea behind your card etc. Instead of outright telling him he's an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i know about Denmark i'd say that it's always a sub-zero area.

 

Not in the mood to correct' date=' it's been stated anyway.

[/quote']

 

1.) AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Lrn2research. Summertime gets up to 30 celcius, sub-zero is only in winter. But then it's also around -5-10 usually.

2.) Then don't post, idiot.

 

First laugh was warranted, though a little direct.

Second was outright cold *lol doublepun?*

 

Instead you can ask him to talk about the idea behind your card etc. Instead of outright telling him he's an idiot.

 

Yes, master. And lolpun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Zeonark

Honestly, even with 4000 ATK, this is underpowered. It drops after it kills 3 monsters only to kill yourself more. I'd only combo this with a Lightning Vortex, Heavy Storm, and Megamorph.

 

I'd...Err...Take the counters off? Or atleast take the self burn out.

 

Glad you didn't break your leg. D:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Griffin - Whatever runs Solemn' date=' that's certainly an easy way to get 2k damage =/ But I don't really think about that stuff, I just make them.

[/quote']

 

Cost =/= damage. Nor does a limited card = consistency.

 

Point. But I don't see what the last part has to do with it. And guys, I'll change it to 100 then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

instead of destroy it' date=' you should have said destroy this card[/b']

 

could end up with one hell of a burn effect, chances are you'll only target the weak monsters though

 

I still feel you should have added in if this card attacks all your opponent's monsters, then you can't attack your opponent directly that turn

 

8/10

 

WRONG. That is why I don't like you. You talk bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

instead of destroy it' date=' you should have said destroy this card[/b']

 

could end up with one hell of a burn effect, chances are you'll only target the weak monsters though

 

I still feel you should have added in if this card attacks all your opponent's monsters, then you can't attack your opponent directly that turn

 

8/10

 

WRONG. That is why I don't like you. You talk bullshit.

 

Harhar... I wonder who else hates Rag.

 

Well, anyways...

 

This kills you. Its Demented. Srsly Demented.

 

Awesome pic, thus a 9/10

 

I'm kinda puzzled at its Dementedness. This reminds me of a Pokemon rebelling against its Trainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

instead of destroy it' date=' you should have said destroy this card[/b']

 

could end up with one hell of a burn effect, chances are you'll only target the weak monsters though

 

I still feel you should have added in if this card attacks all your opponent's monsters, then you can't attack your opponent directly that turn

 

8/10

 

WRONG. That is why I don't like you. You talk bullshit.

 

Yeah, he is wrong, but what the hell? A simply "That's wrong" would have sufficed.

 

The card itself is rather interesting, but that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...