Jump to content

[Zeaux] Skull King Beast


Zeaux

Recommended Posts

your arrogance is that you think people are incapable of reading between the lines

 

you make virtually every card you rate as complete BS. So the REAL Q should be why haven't you told everyone in the RC section to get lost from it since their cards are so pathetic they don't deserve to be card makers?

 

I shall not humor this line of debate any longer. I rate many cards quite positively and you clearly are just trying to attack my reviewing where you have no justification now.

 

To say the true' date=' the only one that are attacking here is you. Examples?

 

ah' date=' good to see more Dino support since they're so rare

 

if you're going to tribute 3 lv4 or higher Dinosaur-Type monsters, then I would expect this card to have a lot more atk power

 

make it lv9 and 3300 atk or something

 

7/10

[/quote']

 

That post was horrible.

 

The last thing Dinos of all monsters need is a beatstick. Keep the attack and lower the requirements or give it an effect which can gain card advantage.

 

Rag' date=' your posts in this topic have been stupid since the only practical difference between level 5 and 6 (outside of WATER monsters) is Synchro Summoning, and for that, making this a level 6 would just make it more powerful and would make it deserve a LOWER ATK.

 

[/quote']

 

I think that's enough, right ?

 

Now tell me, why everyone here LOVE attacks Rag posts ? ¬

 

Envy?

 

When Rag gives advice which would make a card worse, I point it out. He does it enough that when it comes to TCG matters, anyone could be quite justified in calling him stupid on those.

And I do give plenty of positive comments, just never to Ragna's awful balancing skills.

 

Examples? These are from the most recent 5 topics I've commented in.

 

-Sees "Rock Deck"-

-Assumes Rock Stun-

-Checks card-

Oh' date=' nope, looks like [u']this one fits into Megarock Turbo.[/u] Almost forgot that existed. But yeah, nice Rock support that fits well with Megarock and doesn't hate on the other Rock Decks. Good card.

 

Hey... if this works the way I think it does' date=' it could be a pretty playable Ritual. The bit about removing WATER monsters should probably be on the Spell Card instead of the Ritual, but [u']this actually makes a really nice, playable boss monster[/u] since it's immune to the common Rykos/Brios/DADs.

 

EDIT: I just noticed it can be targeted by Monster Effects, I'd change that.

 

Eh. Feels OP'd since I can have 2 in my Graveyard and kill and opponent's monster each end Phase that they're both there. Make it only put counters on your own monsters and this will be a really awesome and interesting card for turning my Spirit Reaper/Krebons/Goblin Zombie/Ect into a 2400 piercing beatstick.

 

Good card.

 

Interesting cards' date='[/u'] but the second is OP'd with the amount of mill available to the game IMO.

Seems like an archtype that loves Skill Drain.

"Destruction"'s Summoning conditions seem to be too steep - they'll stop him ever really hitting the field.

Overall, nice concept, but they'd rely too heavily on getting Skill Drain as a win condition right now without any way to search it.

 

 

Let's sum up what this is in practicality:

Trade-Inable

All Attributes and Cyber Dragon/An X-Saber/Batteryman/Lightsworn/Crystal Beast/Hero in the Graveyard.

A beatstick Fairy.

 

Bolded are the most important things. I can see this in some Chaos Fairy builds' date=' but not amazing in there.

X-Sabers could use it as a spammable 2500 ATK beatstick, but they don't have enough viable options to run Trade-In.

If anywhere, this would be most likely to see play in Batterymen along with Guardian of Order to permit them a strong Trade-In Engine with an easy to revive Beater.

 

[u']Definitely an interesting card though, and I expect it has many uses I've ignored... *thinks*

Oh right, http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Cloudian_-_Turbulence

It's a 2500 ATK Smoke Ball too.

 

I actually really like this card, it seems very fun to play around with and is kindof a new Prisma with the combos it opens up.

 

I even underlined all the most positive bits for you, not including the most helpful bits of my comments which are the suggestions for improvement.

 

 

EDIT: And envy over what exactly? A lack of knowledge of balance and the TCG? That's all I tend to comment on when quoting Ragna, since he lacks important knowledge on both matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JoshIcy

No, it's because his advice is generally lacking back-up information of any kind. Or it's promoting ideals that cripple card design as a whole, which to some people (like me and Griffin) is crippling Ideas as a whole which isn't limited to Card Design.

 

Also:

your arrogance is that you think people are incapable of reading between the lines

How is that NOT attacking or baiting shi on? There is no envy, only frustration and disagreement between cardmakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Raver

Long story short...

Ragna made an awful comment. I commented on a card and wasn't such a wimp that I avoided mentioning anything negative and also pointed out that Ragnas comments had been awful. Ragna acted as though I regularly eat babies. I pointed out the lack of eaten infants. He continued to jump about like a loon. I gave up. Icy supported me. TC Supported Ragna, I pointed out TCs inaccuracies. Icy supported me again. You posted. I posted summary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ragna made an awful comment. I commented on a card and wasn't such a wimp that I avoided mentioning anything negative and also pointed out that Ragnas comments had been awful. Ragna acted as though I regularly eat babies. I pointed out the lack of eaten infants. He continued to jump about like a loon. I gave up. Icy supported me. TC Supported Ragna' date=' I pointed out TCs inaccuracies. Icy supported me again. You posted. I posted summary.

[/quote']

 

O.O Okay good summary.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your arrogance is that you think people are incapable of reading between the lines

 

you make virtually every card you rate as complete BS. So the REAL Q should be why haven't you told everyone in the RC section to get lost from it since their cards are so pathetic they don't deserve to be card makers?

 

I shall not humor this line of debate any longer. I rate many cards quite positively and you clearly are just trying to attack my reviewing where you have no justification now.

 

To say the true' date=' the only one that are attacking here is you. Examples?

 

ah' date=' good to see more Dino support since they're so rare

 

if you're going to tribute 3 lv4 or higher Dinosaur-Type monsters, then I would expect this card to have a lot more atk power

 

make it lv9 and 3300 atk or something

 

7/10

[/quote']

 

That post was horrible.

 

The last thing Dinos of all monsters need is a beatstick. Keep the attack and lower the requirements or give it an effect which can gain card advantage.

 

Rag' date=' your posts in this topic have been stupid since the only practical difference between level 5 and 6 (outside of WATER monsters) is Synchro Summoning, and for that, making this a level 6 would just make it more powerful and would make it deserve a LOWER ATK.

 

[/quote']

 

I think that's enough, right ?

 

Now tell me, why everyone here LOVE attacks Rag posts ? ¬

 

Envy?

 

When Rag gives advice which would make a card worse, I point it out. He does it enough that when it comes to TCG matters, anyone could be quite justified in calling him stupid on those.

And I do give plenty of positive comments, just never to Ragna's awful balancing skills.

 

Examples? These are from the most recent 5 topics I've commented in.

 

-Sees "Rock Deck"-

-Assumes Rock Stun-

-Checks card-

Oh' date=' nope, looks like [u']this one fits into Megarock Turbo.[/u] Almost forgot that existed. But yeah, nice Rock support that fits well with Megarock and doesn't hate on the other Rock Decks. Good card.

 

Hey... if this works the way I think it does' date=' it could be a pretty playable Ritual. The bit about removing WATER monsters should probably be on the Spell Card instead of the Ritual, but [u']this actually makes a really nice, playable boss monster[/u] since it's immune to the common Rykos/Brios/DADs.

 

EDIT: I just noticed it can be targeted by Monster Effects, I'd change that.

 

Eh. Feels OP'd since I can have 2 in my Graveyard and kill and opponent's monster each end Phase that they're both there. Make it only put counters on your own monsters and this will be a really awesome and interesting card for turning my Spirit Reaper/Krebons/Goblin Zombie/Ect into a 2400 piercing beatstick.

 

Good card.

 

Interesting cards' date='[/u'] but the second is OP'd with the amount of mill available to the game IMO.

Seems like an archtype that loves Skill Drain.

"Destruction"'s Summoning conditions seem to be too steep - they'll stop him ever really hitting the field.

Overall, nice concept, but they'd rely too heavily on getting Skill Drain as a win condition right now without any way to search it.

 

 

Let's sum up what this is in practicality:

Trade-Inable

All Attributes and Cyber Dragon/An X-Saber/Batteryman/Lightsworn/Crystal Beast/Hero in the Graveyard.

A beatstick Fairy.

 

Bolded are the most important things. I can see this in some Chaos Fairy builds' date=' but not amazing in there.

X-Sabers could use it as a spammable 2500 ATK beatstick, but they don't have enough viable options to run Trade-In.

If anywhere, this would be most likely to see play in Batterymen along with Guardian of Order to permit them a strong Trade-In Engine with an easy to revive Beater.

 

[u']Definitely an interesting card though, and I expect it has many uses I've ignored... *thinks*

Oh right, http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Cloudian_-_Turbulence

It's a 2500 ATK Smoke Ball too.

 

I actually really like this card, it seems very fun to play around with and is kindof a new Prisma with the combos it opens up.

 

I even underlined all the most positive bits for you, not including the most helpful bits of my comments which are the suggestions for improvement.

 

 

EDIT: And envy over what exactly? A lack of knowledge of balance and the TCG? That's all I tend to comment on when quoting Ragna, since he lacks important knowledge on both matters.

 

I am not talking about those comments, I talking about the comments that you are attacking Ragnarok. Well, I NEVER seen you attacking a member (in comments), except Ragnarok of course.

 

@Icy: He is angry, and with a reason: YOU AND GRIFFIN ALWAYS CRITICIZING HIS POSTS. Will you like if I criticize every post you make? Even if you are right? Of course not, and that is what you and Griffin are making. Just let him post and ignore, you are worrying for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I point out when Ragna gives bad advice so that members don't follow it and end up making their cards worse. When Ragna either learns how to balance cards correctly or stops commenting on balance' date=' I'll have no reason to point out his repeated fallacy-filled posts.

[/quote']

 

Dude, everyone here have their thoughts. If they want to listen Ragnarok's advice, fine. If they don't want, fine too. I mean, is unnecessary comments like this. Just let him post his opinion and you post yours. At least in my threads, please ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...