Le Creatur vs Chaos Zero 1v1: Agni Kai (Le Creatur wins: lock the dang thread)

[Guest War Torn]

They are complaining about the wording

[Sploda]

Yeah about wording that isn't there...

[Guest War Torn]

They are saying that it doesn't specify how much damage your opponent takes, really if I would of caught that when I voted Chaos might of gotten my vote. I said might.

[Sploda]

It can't sate that because the effect says:

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing 3 cards in your Graveyard and 1 card in your hand from play. Once per turn, by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can inflict Direct Damage to your opponent's Life Points. During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponet's Life Points. When this card would be sent to the Graveyard by battle, you can discard 4 cards from your hand to have this card remain on the field.

 

I can't specify because there is no clear cut damage rate.

[Guest War Torn]

I hope everyone is happy that he proved you all wrong :D

[~Duo~]

DRACONUS

 

"When this card destroys an opponents monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters level x 100."

 

Grammar mistakes, but I don't think that really matters.

 

Glad that I'm not seeing "Piercing Damage" on the last sentence.

 

ENZAX

 

The Set ID thing has a small mistake: In EN, the "n" is not capitalized.

 

"Once per turn, by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can [inflict Direct Damage] to your opponent's Life Points."

 

Uh... is that an OCG error?

 

Also, what Aqua Girl already stated, there is an OCG error at the end where it's effect negates destruction.

 

And again, glad I'm not seeing Piercing Damage. :P

 

Overall, Draconus > Enzax 4 meh. Although, I think there should be a slightly bigger cost for the direct attack.

[Sploda]

DRACONUS

 

"When this card destroys an opponents monster by battle' date=' inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters level x 100."

 

Grammar mistakes, but I don't think that really matters.

 

Glad that I'm not seeing "Piercing Damage" on the last sentence.

 

ENZAX

 

The Set ID thing has a small mistake: In EN, the "n" is not capitalized.

 

"Once per turn, by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can [b'][inflict Direct Damage][/b] to your opponent's Life Points."

 

Uh... is that an OCG error?

 

Also, what Aqua Girl already stated, there is an OCG error at the end where it's effect negates destruction.

 

And again, glad I'm not seeing Piercing Damage. :P

 

Overall, Draconus > Enzax 4 meh. Although, I think there should be a slightly bigger cost for the direct attack.

 

And in reference to Aqua's fix of the last part of the effect, either one works. Depends on the person's choice of OCG as they are used interchangably.

And I left it "n" on purpose. Because It prevents me from having to fight with MS Word as I save all my cards in written form as well (just in case).

[~Duo~]

I know, but to me, it doesn't really seem to make sense. In this case, it's still battle damage, right?

[Sploda]

yes, it just bypasses all monsters and hits directly, thus causing Direct damage.

[~Duo~]

Oh, I see.

DRACONUS

 

"When this card destroys an opponents monster by battle' date=' inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters level x 100."

 

Grammar mistakes, but I don't think that really matters.

 

Glad that I'm not seeing "Piercing Damage" on the last sentence.

 

ENZAX

 

The Set ID thing has a small mistake: In EN, the "n" is not capitalized.

 

"Once per turn, by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can [b'][inflict Direct Damage][/b] to your opponent's Life Points."

 

Uh... is that an OCG error?

 

Also, what Aqua Girl already stated, there is an OCG error at the end where it's effect negates destruction.

 

And again, glad I'm not seeing Piercing Damage. :P

 

Overall, Draconus > Enzax 4 meh. Although, I think there should be a slightly bigger cost for the direct attack.

 

And in reference to Aqua's fix of the last part of the effect, either one works. Depends on the person's choice of OCG as they are used interchangably.

(And I left it "n" on purpose.) Because It prevents me from having to fight with MS Word as I save all my cards in written form as well (just in case).

 

But what did you mean by *?

 

* being the sentence in parentheses. **

 

EDIT: ** being the sentence I put in parentheses. Too lazy to bold.

[Shadow Zero]

DRACONUS

 

"When this card destroys an opponents monster by battle' date=' inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed monsters level x 100."

 

Grammar mistakes, but I don't think that really matters.

 

Glad that I'm not seeing "Piercing Damage" on the last sentence.

 

ENZAX

 

The Set ID thing has a small mistake: In EN, the "n" is not capitalized.

 

"Once per turn, by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can [inflict Direct Damage'] to your opponent's Life Points."

 

Uh... is that an OCG error?

 

Also, what Aqua Girl already stated, there is an OCG error at the end where it's effect negates destruction.

 

And again, glad I'm not seeing Piercing Damage. :P

 

Overall, Draconus > Enzax 4 meh. Although, I think there should be a slightly bigger cost for the direct attack.

so should i take this to mean that your vote goes to my card zetaru?

[Kailyn Leona Kyosuke]

I have no Idea what you all are talking about!

My card inflicts direct and piercing damage. none of the effect inflicts any other damage.

So what are you refering to!?

 

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing 3 cards in your Graveyard and 1 card in your hand from play. Once per turn' date=' by decreasing this card's ATK by 1200, you can inflict Direct Damage to your opponent's Life Points.[/b'] During battle between this card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponet's Life Points. When this card would be sent to the Graveyard by battle, you can discard 4 cards from your hand to have this card remain on the field.

 

The bolded part is what im referring to. If it inflicts burn damage, then its classified as effect damage i believe...(otherwise, saying direct damage is outright confusing)

[Shadow Zero]

okay, i think we can all agree that zetaruarc basically voted for my card with his my card > le creaturs card comment, so that takes the score up to a 3-3 tie.

 

um...what was that you were saying about being the zuko of this card contest now creator?

[Sploda]

...

Shut it Zero.

@Kaiyln

Direct Damage refers to damage inflicted from a Direct attack. Its not effect damage, its damage inflicted by the card's ATK.

[Shadow Zero]

well then you should have stated as such on the card huh creator?

[Sploda]

I don't strive for power, I strive to return to Nothingness.

[Deustodo]

I vote for Creator, reasons are simple as pie:

He has better OCG and effect a bit more interesting than Zero card. Also, his picture is better.

Reasons:

The OCG show how much the member know about the card grammar, making his/her card more or less real. The picture condition is also a good point for that, you can have a great card with great OCG, but if you have a bad picture, you are screwed. The Effect originality shows how much work was put in the card. Because a creative effect can affect the game in such way that your opponent lost all of his strategy.

 

So my vote goes to Creator.

Did you like this reason you. bastard?

[Proto]

I vote Creator, he does possess OCG skills a bit better and I find his card more interesting then Zero's.

[Shadow Zero]

i'm sorry, what was that again? all i heard was 'blah blah blah'. is it that people just refuse to adhere to the rules found in the first post? sorry guys, but your votes do not count until you elaborate on your reasoning, such as actually pointing out ocg errors. also, this is not a name/pic/effect length based contest. this is only focusing on the ocg. if you want to add comments on things not ocg specific, then that's okay too.

[Sploda]

They didn't say there were errors, they just said mine was better. That could be wording, order of effect, etc.

And MachineKing siad that mine was more interesting overall, at least his should count.

 

5-3 or 4-3 either way it works for me.

[Shadow Zero]

I vote for Creator' date=' reasons are simple as pie:

He has better OCG and effect a bit more interesting than [u']Zero[/u] card. Also, his picture is better.

I vote Creator' date=' he does possess OCG skills a bit better and I find his card more interesting then Zero's.

[/quote']

there is absolutely no substance to the reasons that either of them gave, that is why i say that their votes do not count until they have elaborated.

[Guest War Torn]

*Contines eating popcorn*

This is getting good ;)

[Scyire]

Le Créateur, was your card made by Deustodo?

That looks like his style.

[Shadow Zero]

hey striker, how about finding people to vote in here hmmm? also, if you could emphasize the need to follow the rules found in the first post, that would be great.

 

and sciyre, i really hope that le creatur did create that card, otherwise i would win by default, and that is no way to win an Agni Kai.

[Guest War Torn]

*Eats popcorn faster*

This is REALLY getting good.

Chaos, I will under 1 condition.

You and me have another best of 3 for 1 on 1 :D