• Gladiator Beast Andal •

[Sander]

[align=center]

 

When this card is Special Summoned by the effect of a "Gladiator Beast" monster, you can send 1 "Gladiator Beast" monster from your Deck to the Graveyard, and draw 1 card. If this card battles, by returning it from the field to the Deck at the end of the Battle Phase, you can Special Summon 1 "Gladiator Beast" monster from your Deck, except "Gladiator Beast Andal".[/align]

 

Holo sheet credit goes to ÐAΣMON -DG-.

[jayjack]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Gladiator_Beast_Andal

This card already exists >_>

1/10

[Sander]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Gladiator_Beast_Andal

This card already exists >_>

1/10

 

Nice to see that you don't know what remakes are.

[Jolta]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Gladiator_Beast_Andal

This card already exists >_>

1/10

 

Today people are remaking Vanillas. I'm surprised G;lads can be Vanillas.

 

I'm glad you added the usual Glad effect.

 

10/10

[jayjack]

well, i get the picture, but you should change the name o.o

[Scatty]

It should be "Gladiator Beast Andal #2". Anyway, good modification of the original. 8/10, because GB effects are too easy to make up.

[-Griffin]

The high ATK is nice, and it can set up for the Fusions alright. Just not sure if I'd run it, then again, my Glad Decks are weird =/

 

How much draw do Glads usually use/want? I'm sure someone told me that their infinite toolbox made draw a bit less valuable to them.

[Sander]

It should be "Gladiator Beast Andal #2".

 

Yeah, like that doesn't seem like a totally stupid name. NOT AT ALL.

[Guest Lily]

Awwww, someone beat me to it D: I wanted to do this T-T

But I see how this would work with Glad Beasts like a treat.

Love it <3

[Scatty]

It should be "Gladiator Beast Andal #2".

 

Yeah' date=' like that doesn't seem like a totally stupid name. NOT AT ALL.

[/quote']

 

This type of writing was used like 4 times by Konamy, you know.

[Jolta]

It should be "Gladiator Beast Andal #2".

 

Yeah' date=' like that doesn't seem like a totally stupid name. NOT AT ALL.

[/quote']

 

This type of writing was used like 4 times by Konamy, you know.

 

I also know. But its still... ironic.

[Dante Dimercurio]

Picture: 8/10. On a real card but I guess it is a remake since the origonal one didn't have an effect.

 

OCG: 9/10. Sweet broseph.

 

Total: 9.99/10. {Cause I am cool like that.}

[Sander]

It should be "Gladiator Beast Andal #2".

 

Yeah' date=' like that doesn't seem like a totally stupid name. NOT AT ALL.

[/quote']

 

This type of writing was used like 4 times by Konamy, you know.

 

That doesn't mean it's not a stupid name.

[jabber2033]

I like the effect, but can't see the card for some reason. It has a box with a red x in the corner...

 

EDIT: Nevermind. Just refreshed the page.

 

Nice remake.

[Wuu.]

You just looove the remakes, huh?

Holo is epic.

Overall it is epic ^_^

[Sander]

You just looove the remakes' date=' huh?[/quote']

 

It seems like it.

[Guest Cursed Reaction]

The usual Gladiator Beast effect is there plus another good component for the GBeast toolbox. And to anyone that says that you need #2 in the name, well, what about the real Egyptian God remakes.

[Sander]

Come on guyze, anybody else?

[Lightning Bagon]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

[Sander]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

Yeah' date=' it's [i']totally[/i] uncreative to give VANILLAS effects. Think about this, when you make a card with a picture, you're pretty much remaking a Vanilla Card and giving it an effect.

[Eury]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

I think Majora Raichu's are a sign of ignorance and stupidity.

 

Nice remake Xander. I love your work. :3

[jayjack]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

Yeah' date=' it's [i']totally[/i] uncreative to give VANILLAS effects. Think about this, when you make a card with a picture, you're pretty much remaking a Vanilla Card and giving it an effect.

 

Those who don't embrace the truth fail at life. Make your own card instead of recreating an existing one. Nearly every archtype has a vanilla monster.

[Sander]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

Yeah' date=' it's [i']totally[/i] uncreative to give VANILLAS effects. Think about this, when you make a card with a picture, you're pretty much remaking a Vanilla Card and giving it an effect.

 

Those who don't embrace the truth fail at life. Make your own card instead of recreating an existing one. Nearly every archtype has a vanilla monster.

 

And those who always jabroni over everything also fail at life. I don't need to see you jabroniing about sheet in my threads. I already explained that remaking Vanillas is pretty much the same as making your own cards. Do I have to explain it more? Eh, I have some time.

 

Vanilla Cards: No effects, just picture and Flavor text.

Your Own Cards: You used a picture, which doesn't have any effects, nor a Flavor text. You give it an effect. You just remade an Vanilla.

 

What I'm trying to say is that when you remake a Vanilla Card, all you're doing is using the picture and the name and stats of an already existing card and give it an effect. That's pretty much the same thing as making your own cards.

[Leturn Master]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

Yeah' date=' it's [i']totally[/i] uncreative to give VANILLAS effects. Think about this, when you make a card with a picture, you're pretty much remaking a Vanilla Card and giving it an effect.

 

Those who don't embrace the truth fail at life. Make your own card instead of recreating an existing one. Nearly every archtype has a vanilla monster.

 

And those who always b**** over everything also fail at life. I don't need to see you jabroniing about s*** in my threads. I already explained that remaking Vanillas is pretty much the same as making your own cards. Do I have to explain it more? Eh, I have some time.

 

Vanilla Cards: No effects, just picture and Flavor text.

Your Own Cards: You used a picture, which doesn't have any effects, nor a Flavor text. You give it an effect. You just remade an Vanilla.

 

What I'm trying to say is that when you remake a Vanilla Card, all you're doing is using the picture and the name and stats of an already existing card and give it an effect. That's pretty much the same thing as making your own cards.

 

Actually, it's quite different. Without having to think about it or work on it, you get an Attribute, Type, Archtype/theme, stats, AND a good picture. You don't have to work at anything except the effect... which means you're more or less cutting your work in half or one-third (depending).

 

But I don't hate on remakes. I just hate on bad ones.

 

For this guyyy... well, I don't see myself using his effect other than to dump "Bestiari" or "Laquari", if I know I'm going to pull out "Darius" to get "Heraklinos" or "Gyzarus"... the chance of screwing up MIGHT be worth the draw. Maybe.

 

Decent card. OK as a card, but total crap for a remake. If you've got 1/2 to 1/3 of the work to do, you should be putting 2 to 3 times the amount of effort and thought into the card effect... it looks like you just put in average.

[-Griffin]

I think re-makes are a sign of increativity and do not belong here

0/10

 

Yeah' date=' it's [i']totally[/i] uncreative to give VANILLAS effects. Think about this, when you make a card with a picture, you're pretty much remaking a Vanilla Card and giving it an effect.

 

Those who don't embrace the truth fail at life. Make your own card instead of recreating an existing one. Nearly every archtype has a vanilla monster.

 

And those who always b**** over everything also fail at life. I don't need to see you jabroniing about s*** in my threads. I already explained that remaking Vanillas is pretty much the same as making your own cards. Do I have to explain it more? Eh, I have some time.

 

Vanilla Cards: No effects, just picture and Flavor text.

Your Own Cards: You used a picture, which doesn't have any effects, nor a Flavor text. You give it an effect. You just remade an Vanilla.

 

What I'm trying to say is that when you remake a Vanilla Card, all you're doing is using the picture and the name and stats of an already existing card and give it an effect. That's pretty much the same thing as making your own cards.

 

Actually, it's quite different. Without having to think about it or work on it, you get an Attribute, Type, Archtype/theme, stats, AND a good picture. You don't have to work at anything except the effect... which means you're more or less cutting your work in half or one-third (depending).

 

But I don't hate on remakes. I just hate on bad ones.

 

For this guyyy... well, I don't see myself using his effect other than to dump "Bestiari" or "Laquari", if I know I'm going to pull out "Darius" to get "Heraklinos" or "Gyzarus"... the chance of screwing up MIGHT be worth the draw. Maybe.

 

Decent card. OK as a card, but total crap for a remake. If you've got 1/2 to 1/3 of the work to do, you should be putting 2 to 3 times the amount of effort and thought into the card effect... it looks like you just put in average.

 

I can't speak for Xander, but how you make cards is DRASTICALLY different from how I make them. Before I make a card, I decide exactly where it's most intended to be used, and how it plays. Then I decide on any attribute/type/atk/def/names that are needed to fit that role, then I make the effect to fit it, then I use the parts that haven't been decided for balance.

 

Having everything but the effect done for you is NOT taking work out of it, it's restricting your options and, IMO, makes the whole card creation process much harder because you have less options to change. For example, if I were making GB support, I'd possibly make it WATER, to let me use Ab-Zero more consistently, or LIGHT, in case I wanted to use Honest with it. I might make the type Winged Beast, to work with Icarus Attack, or make it a Warrior, in case I'm already running RotA for Prisma. When you don't have these options, it's a lot harder to find a niche for the card, especially with something like Andal where the type and attribute stop it from giving any interactions to think about..

 

Just my opinion on the matter.