-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 3x Ganet3x Rumaline3x Alexand3x Jewelresis2x Ryko1x Card Trooper1x Summoner Monk1x Lyla1x Snipe Hunter1x Gale1x Sangan20 3x Jewelknight Fusion3x Fusion Weapon2x Lightning Vortex2x DDR1x Fufu1x Heavy1x Charge1x B-con14 2x Bottomless1x Solemn1x Mirror1x Torrential1x Dustshoot6 Extra:6x Jewelknight Fusion9x Generic Synch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 DAMN!!!!!! You were first... looks solid, Fusion Weapon is a great choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Yeah, should be nice with Rumaline's Fusion. My only problem is consistently having JK Fusion, I'm not sure if the LS Engine&Trooper is enough, since the Deck falls to tatters without it. Should I add another Lyla? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 No, i don't think so. And maybe you will add RfaDD? Since you will remove few monster for GK Fusion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 How on earth did I miss that...Neg what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Umm.... what the B-Con means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Brain Control.I would never neg a B-Con, it's part of my staple template. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Oh, ok, maybe.... FuFu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Fufu is nice with JK Fuse, but I get your point.-1 Fufu+1 RftDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 1 ? : What do you mean by "6x Gemknight Fusion"? You mean 2 copies of each fusion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Yeup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Bump. I'm liking this Deck idea, just worried about consistant-ness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 I know it's new, but dammit YCM, look them up or use your common sense, I must be missing something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 19, 2010 Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 I don't think you need to fix something... it's actually good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 So this Deck is really perfect? I find that hard to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Not PERFECT, but good. IMO, you should drop Synchros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 They're mostly filler. Dropping them doesn't improve the Deck since there's nothing else to put there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 -1 Lightning Vortex+Sengan ...That helps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 Searches Monk. Sure. Change made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.