Sander Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 [align=center] 1 EARTH Tuner + 1 or more Non-Tuner Beast-Type monstersWhen this card is Summoned, you can discard 1 EARTH monster. If you do, all other EARTH monsters you control gain 600 ATK and inflict Piercing damage. When this card destroys a monster in Defense Mode by battle, you can decrease the ATK of this card by 500 (until the end of the Battle Phase), and it can attack once again in a row.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 A few tiny OCG issues like "all other EARTH monsters you control" instead of "all EARTH monsters you control except this card" and "attacks a face-down Defense Position monster and destroys it by battle" instead of "a monster in face-down Defense Mode by battle" (a face-down Defense Position monster is flipped face-up, so it can't be destroyed in battle while face-down) As for the card itself, I can has like. 1) It's not a generic Synchro. 2) I canz haz X-Saberz. 3) Good attack. 4) Great effects. Um, now that I think about it, I think you should lower the amount that the monsters gain. Maybe 500? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 I'm unsure if the "by battle" is even needed after all, you never said its effects destroys monsters 600 atk boost should be reasonable for it, so the balance on the card is there and I'll give this 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted April 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 A few tiny OCG issues like "all other EARTH monsters you control" instead of "all EARTH monsters you control except this card" and "attacks a face-down Defense Position monster and destroys it by battle" instead of "a monster in face-down Defense Mode by battle" (a face-down Defense Position monster is flipped face-up' date=' so it can't be destroyed in battle while face-down)[/quote'] Changed it to just Defense Position. That should take care of that problem. Um' date=' now that I think about it, I think you should lower the amount that the monsters gain. Maybe 500?[/quote'] Changed the ATK gain from 1000 to 600. I'm unsure if the "by battle" is even needed after all' date=' you never said its effects destroys monsters[/quote'] You know, it's funny how horrible you are, in the game and in commenting. If I don't use the "by battle" clause, then how in the world would this card destroy a monster? It doesn't have any effects that destroy monsters outside from battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted April 2, 2010 Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 A few tiny OCG issues like "all other EARTH monsters you control" instead of "all EARTH monsters you control except this card" and "attacks a face-down Defense Position monster and destroys it by battle" instead of "a monster in face-down Defense Mode by battle" (a face-down Defense Position monster is flipped face-up' date=' so it can't be destroyed in battle while face-down)[/quote'] Changed it to just Defense Position. That should take care of that problem. Um' date=' now that I think about it, I think you should lower the amount that the monsters gain. Maybe 500?[/quote'] Changed the ATK gain from 1000 to 600.You don't NEED to make it any Defense Position monster if you don't want to. Ally of Justice Field Marshal has the same condition: it has to attack a face-down monster. But you do have to include "by battle" because...that's just convention. Don't question it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cursed Reaction Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Once again, a good card. Where do get the pictures, if you would be so kind, could you PM them to me (Both Spiral Impact pictures). Good effect and pretty balanced. Once again, good in a Rescue Cat deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Anybody else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted April 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 Oh come on, bump <. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.