TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Picture credit to JazinKay This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Relinquished" from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. You take no battle damage from battles involving this card. When this card attacks, select 1 monster on the field. This card gains ATK equal to the ATK of the selected monster until the End Phase. all pic credit to JazinKaythis can be used to get rid of Relinquished and another monster NEW NEW NEW !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 I actually like this a bit.Need to add the nomi text, but whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 I actually like this a bit.Need to add the nomi text' date=' but whatever.[/quote'] holy crap, you actually liike one of my cardsnew card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Yeah, fixed OCG: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Relinquished" from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. You take no battle damage from battles involving this card. When this card attacks, select 1 monster on the field. This card gains ATK equal to the ATK of the selected monster until the End Phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Yeah' date=' fixed OCG: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Relinquished" from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. You take no battle damage from battles involving this card. When this card attacks, select 1 monster on the field. This card gains ATK equal to the ATK of the selected monster until the End Phase.[/quote']alright i'll fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang Xiao-Long Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 So the servant has higher DEF than the master? hmm.... But anyway, good concept, awesome pics. Effects look good. OCG looks good, Byak got the fixes already. Good cards. I would put them in a deck any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 So the servant has higher DEF than the master? hmm.... But anyway' date=' good concept, awesome pics. Effects look good. OCG looks good, Byak got the fixes already. Good cards. I would put them in a deck any day.[/quote'] yup, the servant has become the master Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallieBigs Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Picture credit to JazinKay This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by removing from play 1 "Relinquished" from your Graveyard. This card cannot be destroyed by battle. You take no battle damage from battles involving this card. When this card attacks' date=' select 1 monster on the field. This card gains ATK equal to the ATK of the selected monster until the End Phase.[img']http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8572/504557g.jpg[/img] all pic credit to JazinKaythis can be used to get rid of Relinquished and another monsterI would tech the the third one, no run it in 2 or 3s in any deck. Seems slightly broken. Card number 2 is cool it can make my Hunter Dragon a 2700 attack monster :D. The first one, it's interesting, very interesting. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 bumpnew card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 I find Relinquished's Servant OPed. I mean you take no damage and he be destroyed. I won't mind a "As long as this card remains face-up on the field "Relinquished" cannot be destroyed by battle. Increase "Relinquished's" ATK and DEF by 200x the equipped monsters card Level." Then add a drawback. Now that is what I call a support for Relinquished. Anyway I didn't read the others thinking they'll be OPed to. 7/10 Its still a nice card though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallieBigs Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 I find Relinquished's Servant OPed. I mean you take no damage and he be destroyed. I won't mind a "As long as this card remains face-up on the field "Relinquished" cannot be destroyed by battle. Increase "Relinquished's" ATK and DEF by 200x the equipped monsters card Level." Then add a drawback. Now that is what I call a support for Relinquished. Anyway I didn't read the others thinking they'll be OPed to. 7/10 Its still a nice card though.Lol. That would make it terrible. You can still destroy these cards by effect... The next two I like them. Drawing 1 extra card is always good, the last one is interesting equip it to a Level 3 for it to gain 1000. Still liking it a lot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 new card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 I find Relinquished's Servant OPed. I mean you take no damage and he be destroyed. I won't mind a "As long as this card remains face-up on the field "Relinquished" cannot be destroyed by battle. Increase "Relinquished's" ATK and DEF by 200x the equipped monsters card Level." Then add a drawback. Now that is what I call a support for Relinquished. Anyway I didn't read the others thinking they'll be OPed to. 7/10 Its still a nice card though.Lol. That would make it terrible. You can still destroy these cards by effect... The next two I like them. Drawing 1 extra card is always good' date=' the last one is interesting equip it to a Level 3 for it to gain 1000. Still liking it a lot...[/quote']I was just making a suggestion. And besides it is a little OPed. And it needs is a small drawback like: "This card must pay 100 Life Points to declare an attack." I mean thats not that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluemer Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Trap Treasure Chest is OPed. if ur opponent gained 3000 lp instead of just 600, maybe it would be fairer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Trap Treasure Chest is OPed. if ur opponent gained 3000 lp instead of just 600' date=' maybe it would be fairer[/quote']Are you crazy!!!!!!! That card is perfectly fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 So the servant has higher DEF than the master? hmm.... But anyway' date=' good concept, awesome pics. Effects look good. OCG looks good, Byak got the fixes already. Good cards. I would put them in a deck any day.[/quote'] yup, the servant has become the master Then why is she called "Servant"? Such name is not appropriate for her. You could change it for... "Summoner", "Master", "Incarnate",etc. Instead of making a second "Soul Absorbing Dimension", why don't you simply update your 1st "Soul Absorbing Dimension"? No one will use the 1st dimension anyways, as it's outclassed by the 2nd. Why do you focus in Level 3 monsters? I would like to know what (or which monsters) do you have in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR~ Posted April 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 So the servant has higher DEF than the master? hmm.... But anyway' date=' good concept, awesome pics. Effects look good. OCG looks good, Byak got the fixes already. Good cards. I would put them in a deck any day.[/quote'] yup, the servant has become the master Then why is she called "Servant"? Such name is not appropriate for her. You could change it for... "Summoner", "Master", "Incarnate",etc. Instead of making a second "Soul Absorbing Dimension", why don't you simply update your 1st "Soul Absorbing Dimension"? No one will use the 1st dimension anyways, as it's outclassed by the 2nd. Why do you focus in Level 3 monsters? I would like to know what (or which monsters) do you have in mind.there are two skyscraper cards, skryscaper and skyscraper 2that increases teh chance of drawing a field spell if you have 3 4 eachi'm focussing on lv3 monsters cuz there isn't enough support 4 them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 Your arguments are true, but note that each Skyscraper have a completely different effect, unlike your absorbing dimensions. Trust me, with an upgraded version available, no one would run the Absorbing Dimension #1. And, if I wanted to increase my chances of drawing a Field Spell, I would use "Terraforming" or "Demise of the Land". Do you know what would work amazingly? Change one of your fields to Continuous Spell (preferably the Dimension #1), that way it will stack with the Dimension #2 and boost the ATK of a Level 3 monster by 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted April 3, 2010 Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 for Soul Absorbing Dimension, this is going be hell if your opponent uses Injection Fairy Lily against you change may to can Interesting to see the Relinquished Servant actually has more def power than Relinquished itself for Trap Treasure Chest, you should have said UP TO 2 monsters on the field as for Gel Beast, the 2nd sentence should be This card cannot be SPECIAL SUMMONED except....... personally given that effect for Gel Beast, I had hoped it'd be stronger than just lv1, and it could get OPed when combined with Soul Absorbing Dimension 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.