Sleepy Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Here's one of my cards using one of my temporary self-drawn pics. [align=center][/align]1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner MonstersThe Synchro Material Monsters must have different Types. When this card battles' date=' the opponent's monster is treated as having their original ATK during the Damage Step only. If your opponent takes no Battle Damage from a battle involving this card, inflict 1000 damage to your opponent.[/quote'] [align=center][/align]All monsters gain 400 ATK and DEF' date=' except while attaking. When a player would take damage, you can have it treated as Battle Damage or Effect Damage. If a card effect would have you pay exactly 1000 Life Points, gain the same ammount instead. The card resolves normally.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skiing-Kirby Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 http://www.yelp.com/redir?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.techsmartly.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blamonchesix Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Lv 3 Synchro? Nice effect. I can't understand the second card though. 9/10. Cool. Like it a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Lv 3 Synchro? Nice effect. I can't understand the second card though. 9/10. Cool. Like it a lot. Yay =D its a combo. The second card makes all monsters (yours and your opponent's) gain 400 ATK, (except while attacking), it doesn't seem to make a difference :) but when a 3400 ATK blue eyes attacks a 3400 ATK blue eyes, since it is attacking it is not 3400 ATK anymore during that time so..... its a stalling effect. The attack targets on the field suddenly become harder to kill, and other effects that modify ATK in my Deck also work with this. The second effects just lets you choose what type of "damage" do you want each damage to be. If your opponent has Waboku, they will still get damage from you that turn because there is not going to be "Battle" damage to them. In the same way, you could redirect battle damage you take from your opponent with cards that transfer effect damage, if you choose to have it treated as such. And so many other possibilities =D The last effect is just because my Deck will have a lot of "pay 1000 to do this" effects, with this I gain Life instead. The last sentence is just so I can evade possible rulings like "if you didn't really pay, you can't activate it" and stuff like that. So you are treated like you paid but you really gained ^-^ If I had to choose a classification term for my Deck, I would say its more of a Damage Conversion Deck. Thanks for commenting ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 BUMP The ammount of comments I've been getting back this year in this section is horrible O_oplz some comments would be nice.You can comment on anything. OCG, pic, effect, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 BumpCome on everyone, you can do better than that. This is pretty pathetic. Is my card that confusing that people don't even comment? O_o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altaïr Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 opponent should be Opponent.cant see anything else oh yeah i think Opponents should be Opponent's k?8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 opponent should be Opponent.cant see anything else oh yeah i think Opponents should be Opponent's k?8.5/10 No, opponent is not capitalized but thanks anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altaïr Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 i thought it was?then its 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 i thought it was?then its 9/10 Thanks. Any other comment about the card(s) =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted May 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 I'll try to BUMP this again and see if I get comments (its worth the try[?]) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.