-Griffin Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 http://shriek.twoday.net/stories/6253468/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Larvals? And they are good, LS love them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Not a bad start by why does Konami insist on making monsters that work specifically with one archetype but aren't that archetype....Hawk, Prominence, and Kaien, I'm looking at you. Burner is basically the Wulf of the archetype and is quite nice. BftDD at 1 really limits the initial options of these guys. Also, why does Konami think that nuking an entire field and still being able to attack is fair but attacking and burning in the same turn calls for a restriction clause? <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted April 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Not a bad start by why does Konami insist on making monsters that work specifically with one archetype but aren't that archetype....Hawk' date=' Prominence, and Kaien, I'm looking at you. Burner is basically the Wulf of the archetype and is quite nice. BftDD at 1 really limits the initial options of these guys. Also, why does [b']Konami[/b] think that nuking an entire field and still being able to attack is fair but attacking and burning in the same turn calls for a restriction clause? <_< Answered your own question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Not a bad start by why does Konami insist on making monsters that work specifically with one archetype but aren't that archetype....Hawk' date=' Prominence, and Kaien, I'm looking at you. Burner is basically the Wulf of the archetype and is quite nice. BftDD at 1 really limits the initial options of these guys. Also, why does [b']Konami[/b] think that nuking an entire field and still being able to attack is fair but attacking and burning in the same turn calls for a restriction clause? <_< Answered your own question. Touché good sir, touché. Also totally off-topic but I love that book you have quoted in your signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Lavals are so awesome, it isnt even funny. Also, Lavas should have the same theme as Mattrex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.