ALRIGHT, LET'S DO THIS! [relay soul]

[werewolfjedi]

 

Activate only when your Life Points are decreased to 0. Special Summon 1 monster from your hand. As long as that monster remains on the field, you remain in the Duel.

 

this is actually fairly balanced.

 

I think they should make it for real. what about you?

[Great Unclean One: VK]

I thinkz they should make it.

 

It's balanced, and will last up to one turn!

[Toffee.]

Activate this for a strong monster.

 

Opponent, during Main Phase 2, plays Smashing Ground.

 

........You still lose.

[werewolfjedi]

Activate this for a strong monster.

 

Opponent' date=' during Main Phase 2, plays Smashing Ground.

 

........You still lose.

[/quote']

 

yeah, but they had to go a little farther, which could create a very interesting situation where your throwing wall after wall of protection in front of it.

 

I think it would be fun.

 

also, life gain for the comeback!

[VolTama]

Combo with Spirit Reaper. Y'know, for the lulz.

[werewolfjedi]

Combo with Spirit Reaper. Y'know' date=' for the lulz.

[/quote']

 

you want lulz?

here's this.

they t.t. to a sp. summon, and then attack directly for the win with their normal

activate rely soul, summon ob. the tor.

at the end of the turn, when he would be killed by his effect, sac him to mystic wok to have 4000 lp.

[evilfusion]

I think the rulings on this card would make it too complicated to use and Mystic Wok is a good example. The monster leaves the field (which should promptly cause defeat because your "soul" is in the monster), but you gain LP, which by the rules means you're still in the game. Would a RL equivalent instead read "If the monster leaves the field, you lose the duel", rather than "As long as the monster remains on the field, you remain in the duel".

 

Also- Infernity Guardian for the lolz.

 

I'm fond of cards whose concept revolves around surviving at 0 LP, even though creating them would be difficult without overpowering them.

[werewolfjedi]

I think the rulings on this card would make it too complicated to use and Mystic Wok is a good example. The monster leaves the field (which should promptly cause defeat because your "soul" is in the monster)' date=' but you gain LP, which by the rules means you're still in the game. Would a RL equivalent instead read "If the monster leaves the field, you lose the duel", rather than "As long as the monster remains on the field, you remain in the duel".

 

Also- Infernity Guardian for the lolz.

 

I'm fond of cards whose concept revolves around surviving at 0 LP, even though creating them would be difficult without overpowering them.

[/quote']

 

if it follows the rules of gracefull charity, then while mystic wok would not work, a few others could.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

All this does is screw with non-battle decks, which really isn't needed.

[werewolfjedi]

All this does is screw with non-battle decks' date=' which really isn't needed.

[/quote']

 

just burn, and even burn has some monster removal.

[metalflygon08]

their should be a part so you can tribute the monster for a summon, and if you do the new monster becomes the 'Soul Monster'

[Canadian]

I don't see why it shouldn't be made. It's actually really fair.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

All this does is screw with non-battle decks' date=' which really isn't needed.

[/quote']

 

just burn, and even burn has some monster removal.

 

Burn really shouldn't have to invest in something that messes with an already unreliable deck. This card's release is just pointless.

[wero-vasto]

Isn't that the hand of Atem? D:

[GenzoTheHarpist]

Chain this to self destruct button for super lolz.

[Yankee]

If it said "ignoring summoning conditions", I'd lol so hard.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Chain this to self destruct button for super lolz.

 

I love it :3

[werewolfjedi]

Chain this to self destruct button for super lolz.

 

I love it :3

 

ok, that's just mean, course, there does need to be a 7000 point difference in lp.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Chain this to self destruct button for super lolz.

 

I love it :3

 

ok' date=' that's just mean, course, there does need to be a 7000 point difference in lp.

[/quote']

 

If it's a self-destruct deck, you don't really need to worry about that :S

[werewolfjedi]

Chain this to self destruct button for super lolz.

 

I love it :3

 

ok' date=' that's just mean, course, there does need to be a 7000 point difference in lp.

[/quote']

 

If it's a self-destruct deck, you don't really need to worry about that :S

 

if they ever release this, button would get banned, as it's only use is for draw/win.

[Chaos Flame]

Didn't this card get used against that infinite ATK serpent thing that prevents him from losing?

Its actually a balanced card, Konami should release both it and infernity zero.

[zombiepromking]

If only it said "ignoring summoning conditions," just SS DAD or JD and lol away, annnd then your opponent activates Bottomless

 

:D

[Aesirson]

If only it said "ignoring summoning conditions' date='" just SS DAD or [b']JD[/b] and lol away, annnd then your opponent activates Bottomless

 

:D

You will totally be able to use it with 0 LP anyway.

[zombiepromking]

If only it said "ignoring summoning conditions' date='" just SS DAD or [b']JD[/b] and lol away, annnd then your opponent activates Bottomless

 

:D

You will totally be able to use it with 0 LP anyway.

 

Yup, i just meant as a beater.

[werewolfjedi]

If only it said "ignoring summoning conditions' date='" just SS DAD or JD and lol away, annnd then your opponent activates Bottomless

 

:D

[/quote']

 

that's why you choose something that is hard to kill.

also:

"lp hit 0"

opponent: I win!

me: not yet you don't, I activate all 3 facedown cards, 3 copys of relay soul!

(summons 3 defender TMK's)

now to win, you have to get all three of these off the field!

opp: but, but, that's immpossible, I don't run RFP stuff, and you bottomlessed my brio.

I win by 23 turn deck out.