GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Card advantage is incredibly important and with that we have little to no cards that are able to clear 2 big vanilla monsters alone. Treacherous Trap Hole is the only one that comes to mind. Duh... Icarus attack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 OMGOMGOMG LOLOLOLOL You have to be kidding me. Bounce Gorz and win. She ran out of cards in her hand and only managed to poke for 2500 twice. I understand that but Gorz is easy to deal with (at least should be). Contradicts with: we have little to no cards that are able to clear 2 big vanilla monsters alone. You can't have it both ways kid. Either it's easy to deal with it or it's difficult to deal with. The rest of your post was stupid and made no sense' date=' like your last post. Duh... Icarus attack? ... I could have sworn you were much less retarded the last time we spoke. 1: "we have little to no cards that are able to clear 2 big vanilla monsters alone." Unless Icarus Attack stopped needing a tribute I'm afraid I'm gonna have to ask you to stop looking like an idiot.2: Icarus Attack isn't at all easily splashable. You need winged beasts to make it work well for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Why' date=' from your post. The basis of Mirror Force and Torrential; the more monsters your opponent has, the more you benefit from it. Gorz is a +1, granting that you take Battle Damage and that we count the Token as a card. According to your post, Mirror Force and Torrential will therefore [b']naturally[/b] be +0's or less, meaning that they're either:A)always countered.orB) in the case of Torrential, used on your own monster. That's not what I said at all. Unless you have a guaranteed OTK, a good player will usually never commit to more than 2 monsters on the field at the end of their turn. Therefore, Force and Torrent are not usually game-ending cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 I honestly think it's funny that you talk about grammar when it is clearly not the issue. You go away from the debate itself and focus it upon something else and ignore me as if my counter statement as if you have nothing to say to rebut it. = wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 My issue with grammar is that I.. literally... can not make heads or tails of his statement. I'm not being a facetious ass or anything. I just have no clue what he's saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 I <3 this topic SO much.Hilarious to read. I read a lot, and still haven't seen a reason for it to be banned. I see people saying it's powerful, and CAN be a problem, but I haven't seen people calling for a ban, or saying he DESERVES to be banned. Now, from what I remember, everybody was ragging on JD for being OP'd, should be limited/banned, because of it's field nuke.So..isn't it a good idea to have there be something you can do even after a field nuke?Sure, your opponent can pay another 1000 to get rid of their issues, but thats already 2000 life points, and an ended battle phase. Gorz is such an easy card to notice, and get around. It's surprising people are arguing as much as they are about this. GO AZUH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Now' date=' from what I remember, everybody was ragging on JD for being OP'd, should be limited/banned, because of it's field nuke.So..isn't it a good idea to have there be something you can do even after a field nuke?[/quote'] Isn't it an even better idea to just ban the easy field nukes instead of locking us in Code Trainwreck via Nash Logic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 i prefer vash logic. love n peace yo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 My true goal here is to invent so much unnecessary jargon that not even I can understand what I'm saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 What is this jargon we speak of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I think that blue eyes is stronger because it has higher atk But seriously, this card isn't awesome. Just good. Not worth wasting 1 space, most of the time. Only side it against JD's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 I think that blue eyes is stronger because it has higher atk But seriously' date=' this card isn't awesome. Just good. Not worth wasting 1 space, most of the time. Only side it against JD's.[/quote'] And Junk Destroyah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.