LourDeath Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 JUSTIFICATIONS:Treated "DM" while face-up to use DM-support cardsTreated "DM" while in graveyard to use some DM-GravecallersTreated "DM" while in Graveyard for DM-girltoo much of 1 copy is abusableDuelist can still have 3 DM and 1 of these because it is only treated DM while in field or Graveyard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inferno I20 Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 would be good if it added spell counters or somethinggod imagine this with dark magic attackinstant harpies feather duster right there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 yah... heheh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaosIncarn Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Not half bad. Not too much to say about it. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Not bad, but you should add some extra effect. It is to UP atm.Maybe some kind of Spell Card supporting effect (Like almost every other Spellcaster Card).Pic is ok and a bit OU.A 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Incognito:. Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Short and Sweet!No.It's way too borring.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Not bad' date=' but you should add some extra effect. It is to UP atm.Maybe some kind of Spell Card supporting effect (Like almost every other [b']Spell[/b]caster Card).Pic is ok and a bit OU.A 7/10 i'm sorry... but what's atm? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted June 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 oh thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 "There can only be 1 "Shadow Magician" in your Deck." Let's see, how can this car be "abused"?1. Makes Dark Magic Attack easy to activate.2. Could raise Dark Magician Girl's ATK by 300!!!!!!!!!3. Trade 1900 ATK Skilled Dark Magician for 1700 ATK Shadow Magician!!!!!4. ... Remove the bold sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 I agree with Cakey: I don't think this card is abusable at all. Instead, running 3 would make "Dark Magician" decks more fun and perhaps more competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LourDeath Posted June 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 "There can only be 1 "Shadow Magician" in your Deck." Let's see' date=' how can this car be "abused"?1. Makes Dark Magic Attack easy to activate.2. Could raise Dark Magician Girl's ATK by 300!!!!!!!!!3. Trade 1900 ATK Skilled Dark Magician for 1700 ATK Shadow Magician!!!!!4. ... Remove the [b']bold[/b] sentence. that's the purpose..... you're not thinking.... XDwhy would you trade it for Skilled DM when you can only have 1 copy of this..... people now don't know how to figure it out...i explained it's purpose above and now restating it below... imba... XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usetheforcehan Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 You can't limited the card by saying "There can only be 1 "Shadow Magician" in your Deck" in the card's lore. Cards limitation is only allowed by Konami and Kazuki Takahashi or by the Konami representation in the overseas country. With 3 copy of these cards, DM Deck is more harder to defeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Exactly: leave the limiting to Konami and their people who balance that stuff, or to YCM. You can state yourself that it should be only run at 1 for balancing purposes, but don't write it in the card's effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
touzaikokon Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 Effect: All well and good, except I don't believe you can Limit the card in the card's text. Besides, I think it's okay being run at 3. It gives DM decks more viability, and would make them more fun. (2 points) Grammar: Looks good. No problems that I can see. (3 points) Style: Is that picture custom? If so, it looks sweet. You should also consider holo-ing it, but it's cool either way. (3 points) Overall: 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.