Jump to content

Start Voting[wero-vasto] Vs. [Reasonating Lust] Over, wero-vasto wins


wero-vasto

Recommended Posts

•First to 3 Votes wins or who has more at 06-10-2010

•At least 1 valid reason for each vote...

•Of course... it needs to be a Counterpart of JD ^^

 

[align=center]*Card A

 

25511g.jpg

 

[spoiler=Effect]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 1 "Judgement Dragon" from your Deck or by having 4 or more "Malefic" monsters in your Graveyard. There can only be 1 face-up "Malefic" monster on the field. Other monsters you control cannot attack. Once per turn, you can remove all "Malefic" monsters in your Graveyard from play to destroy all other cards on the field.

 

 

*Card B*

 

185605i.jpg

 

[spoiler=Effect]

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by having 4 or more DARK monsters with different names in your Graveyard. You can remove from play 4 DARK monsters in your Graveyard to destroy all other cards on the field. During each of your End Phases, remove the top 4 cards of your Deck.

 

 

[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, ya won't really be proving much. If ya wanna actually prove yourself, ya gotta beat me in something more meaningful XD

Remember, I've made Victory Battleground, Tiamat Dragon, and many other originals ;)

 

Anyway, do I just PM my card to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resonating lust would u be able to send me a link to those cards u mentioned be4, just curious

card b, reason: OCG seems goodon both cards, and i had to r research the "Malefic" theme to actually know what they are and it seems basically all of them have the "If there is no Field Spell Card on the field, destroy this card." So i'm wondering how come this one doesn't have it? they probs dont have to have it, but to me seems like it would fit with the other cards more if it did have that in it. Aside from that card b is basic and simple, but, it is a spot on effect for a DARK counterpart, it has the Deck mill and destroy all other cards on the field, pic is better to. so for that

Card b gets my vote,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resonating lust would u be able to send me a link to those cards u mentioned be4' date=' just curious

card b, reason: OCG seems goodon both cards, and i had to r research the "Malefic" theme to actually know what they are and it seems basically all of them have the "If there is no Field Spell Card on the field, destroy this card." So i'm wondering how come this one doesn't have it? they probs dont have to have it, but to me seems like it would fit with the other cards more if it did have that in it. Aside from that card b is basic and simple, but, it is a spot on effect for a DARK counterpart, it has the Deck mill and destroy all other cards on the field, pic is better to. so for that

Card b gets my vote,

[/quote']

 

It doesn't have it, because it's effect would kill itself in that case. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote card A, they ARE the same except the pic and stuff, I really like the Winter themed-like picture for card A. Card B is an undead looking thing (which I hate how a lot of people always use pics like that with the skeleton ppl) I prefer the full dragon XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...