Another JayJack Original. This time, an Anti-meta!

[jayjack]

[align=center]

 

LORE

Pay 1000 Life Points. The effects of all cards that can negate other cards is negated (except "Unity of Contrast"). Cards that negate the activation or effect of other cards cannot be activated. When a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks another LIGHT or DARK monster of a different Attribute, you can remove both cards from play and gain Life Points equal to the combined Levels of the cards x 100.[/align]

[lolwhy]

9/10. I can see this in a Toon Deck. Nice Artwork!

 

For the last effect, do you remove both monster from play after damage calculation?

[jayjack]

9/10. I can see this in a Toon Deck. Nice Artwork!

 

For the last effect' date=' do you remove both monster from play after damage calculation?

[/quote']

 

No. When they attack, this card's effect is activated. It removes both before damage calculation or the damage step. Hell, before it even impacts. Though since it's optional, it can miss the timing.

[FriendlyHost]

cool card, howd u make it gold? 9.5/10

[Guest JoshIcy]

Omg~ Parshaths <3 my fav monsters *squeeee*

Anyway, seemingly broken (totally negates other negaters). But it can still be destroyed so it isnt THAT bad. Nice idea, needs a little work but yeah... I like.

 

However, those last lines seem totally out of place =/... Any chance you can remove them?

[jayjack]

cool card' date=' howd u make it gold? 9.5/10

[/quote']

 

Photoshop. you can visit my tut if you want gold rare holo http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-198517.html

 

I'll add this holo to list later.

---

Omg~ Parshaths <3 my fav monsters *squeeee*

Anyway' date=' seemingly broken (totally negates other negaters). But it can still be destroyed so it isnt THAT bad. Nice idea, needs a little work but yeah... I like.

 

However, those last lines seem totally out of place =/... Any chance you can remove them?

[/quote']

 

Oh Josh, you're so cute when you're trying to be mean.

This is an Anti-Meta card. Can't really say it's broken.

The last part i put to match the image. Even though i don't think you'll use it much. Unless going LS vs BW of course.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Omg~ Parshaths <3 my fav monsters *squeeee*

Anyway' date=' seemingly broken (totally negates other negaters). But it can still be destroyed so it isnt THAT bad. Nice idea, needs a little work but yeah... I like.

 

However, those last lines seem totally out of place =/... Any chance you can remove them?

[/quote']

 

Oh Josh, you're so cute when you're trying to be mean.

This is an Anti-Meta card. Can't really say it's broken.

The last part i put to match the image. Even though i don't think you'll use it much. Unless going LS vs BW of course.

 

Wasn't trying to be mean. Those last lines seem totally unnecessary. Any chance I can have the image? *puppy eyes*.

[FriendlyHost]

why dont u make ur own cards josh, lol

[Guest JoshIcy]

why dont u make ur own cards josh' date=' lol

[/quote']

 

I do? 99% of my images, I grab myself. Is it wrong to see an image I like, and I happen to be a fanboy of the Parshath Cards. Asking for it is perfectly natural and expected.

[jayjack]

Omg~ Parshaths <3 my fav monsters *squeeee*

Anyway' date=' seemingly broken (totally negates other negaters). But it can still be destroyed so it isnt THAT bad. Nice idea, needs a little work but yeah... I like.

 

However, those last lines seem totally out of place =/... Any chance you can remove them?

[/quote']

 

Oh Josh, you're so cute when you're trying to be mean.

This is an Anti-Meta card. Can't really say it's broken.

The last part i put to match the image. Even though i don't think you'll use it much. Unless going LS vs BW of course.

 

Wasn't trying to be mean. Those last lines seem totally unnecessary. Any chance I can have the image? *puppy eyes*.

 

I'll pm you.

[byak]

Doesn't seem anti-meta imo.

[jayjack]

Doesn't seem anti-meta imo.

 

It doesn't? I could've sworn that it could just destroy all stardust, naturia, and many other decks that rely on negate. Also, it somewhat eliminates DARK/LIGHT monsters if using opposite.

[senatheEND]

Problem This makes no sense

 

"When a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks another LIGHT or DARK monster of a different Attribute"

 

Issue:

If a light or dark monster attacks another light or dark monster of a different attribute.. well that cant happen cause its only when a light or dark attacks a light or dark shouldn't you just say

 

When a light or dark Monster Attacks a Light or dark monster

 

Or!

 

When a light or dark monster Attacks a monster of a different attribute?

 

Makes sense don't it anyway with out that line was a good card Op but good

[byak]

Doesn't seem anti-meta imo.

 

It doesn't? I could've sworn that it could just destroy all stardust' date=' naturia, and many other decks that rely on negate. Also, it somewhat eliminates DARK/LIGHT monsters if using opposite.

[/quote']

 

Lights aren't Tier 1 anymore.

[jayjack]

Problem This makes no sense

 

"When a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks another LIGHT or DARK monster of a different Attribute"

 

Issue:

If a light or dark monster attacks another light or dark monster of a different attribute.. well that cant happen cause its only when a light or dark attacks a light or dark shouldn't you just say

 

When a light or dark Monster Attacks a Light or dark monster

 

Or!

 

When a light or dark monster Attacks a monster of a different attribute?

 

Makes sense don't it anyway with out that line was a good card Op but good

 

it's not that hard to understand.

Light Monster attacks Dark monster or Dark monster attacks light monster.

If a LIGHT/DARK monster attacks a LIGHT/DARK monster of a different attribute then the attacking monster. Get it?

[ProSora]

pic is very good

effect is anti-meta

and the last lines should be not light or dark attacks a light or dark monster it should be if a light and dark monster fight, cus your effect could be light vs light or dark vs dark... and it would be contradicting to the title

8~9/10

[senatheEND]

Problem This makes no sense

 

"When a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks another LIGHT or DARK monster of a different Attribute"

 

Issue:

If a light or dark monster attacks another light or dark monster of a different attribute.. well that cant happen cause its only when a light or dark attacks a light or dark shouldn't you just say

 

When a light or dark Monster Attacks a Light or dark monster

 

Or!

 

When a light or dark monster Attacks a monster of a different attribute?

 

Makes sense don't it anyway with out that line was a good card Op but good

 

it's not that hard to understand.

Light Monster attacks Dark monster or Dark monster attacks light monster.

If a LIGHT/DARK monster attacks a LIGHT/DARK monster of a different attribute then the attacking monster. Get it?

 

It be easyer to say

If a light or dark monster atks a light or dark monster

which covers

Light v dark

Light vs Light

Dark v Light

Dark vs Dark

[jayjack]

Problem This makes no sense

 

"When a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks another LIGHT or DARK monster of a different Attribute"

 

Issue:

If a light or dark monster attacks another light or dark monster of a different attribute.. well that cant happen cause its only when a light or dark attacks a light or dark shouldn't you just say

 

When a light or dark Monster Attacks a Light or dark monster

 

Or!

 

When a light or dark monster Attacks a monster of a different attribute?

 

Makes sense don't it anyway with out that line was a good card Op but good

 

it's not that hard to understand.

Light Monster attacks Dark monster or Dark monster attacks light monster.

If a LIGHT/DARK monster attacks a LIGHT/DARK monster of a different attribute then the attacking monster. Get it?

 

It be easyer to say

If a light or dark monster atks a light or dark monster

which covers

Light v dark

Light vs Light

Dark v Light

Dark vs Dark

 

you make no sense. I just explained it to you. Doesn't work with same attribute.

[wero-vasto]

Doesn't seem anti-meta imo.

 

It doesn't? I could've sworn that it could just destroy all stardust' date=' naturia, and many other decks that rely on negate. Also, it somewhat eliminates DARK/LIGHT monsters if using opposite.

[/quote']

 

Lights aren't Tier 1 anymore.

 

If I'm good .___. WIND is the new Tier right? .___.

 

IT:

Kinda OPed... and as Josh said .__. I find the alst effect useless .__.

[ProSora]

It be easyer to say

If a light or dark monster atks a light or dark monster

which covers

Light v dark

Light vs Light

Dark v Light

Dark vs Dark

 

you make no sense. I just explained it to you. Doesn't work with same attribute.

 

well it really does o.o... "when a LIGHT or DARK monster attacks a LIGHT or DARK"

[Limited Edition KING]

I like it it makes the attacking monsters seem like DDWL if the requirements are met and you gain Life Points to.

 

Maybe add in something like during your Standby Phase you must pay (insertamountoflifepointshere) to keep this card on the field. If you cannot destroy this card.

 

that OCG maybe off but it gets the jidst of what I mean. That way theres more of a cost to such a powerful card and a good backbone to it aswell when you use the life point gain effect.

 

Good job absolutely love the image where do you find them?

[Skyson]

So, an anti-meta card that missed its target meta by about 2 or 3 formats?

 

This just in, nothing light is meta.

 

X-Sabers are EARTH.

 

Infernities are DARK.

 

Gladiator Beasts are neither DARK nor LIGHT, aside from Gyzarus.

 

 

This is a tool that LIGHT decks can use to rape DARK decks. Oh look, while this card's up, you can't negate anything I do, and any battles you try to have with me or I want to have with you, I can say "screw that" and remove both monsters!

 

"oh well it can be destroyed"

 

REALLY. Every card in this game that can be destroyed is balanced? Ahaha, no.

 

This is broken. You wouldn't run this in anti-meta because you have to play LIGHT and DARK to be able to use the actual useful effect.

 

The negation negation effect is semi-useful and you even put down yourself the gigantic spectrum of meta cards it stops.

 

Solemn Judgement and Stardust Dragon. YEAAAAAAAH. ROCKIN.

 

It's not anti-meta, it's a LIGHT deck's feeble attempt at answering to a meta that put it down the crapper.

 

It's OP. Negate all negation and hold the ability to control element battles in your favor every time. There is no downside to this card. "You can't negate things either!" Oh wait, don't run negation.

 

 

Anti-meta cards that can't be run in anti-meta decks, pretty choice stuff. <_<

 

4/10.

[jayjack]

bump