Guest JoshIcy Posted June 12, 2010 Report Share Posted June 12, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limited Edition KING Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 Nice spell counter support ^^ Just one little wording problem I can't get around. "Double the amount of spell counters cards on the field" Just doesn't seem to fit right :\ "Double the amount of Spell Counters on cards you control that you can put a Spell Counter on..." Maybe a better fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 Love the picture and the name. Hand drawn picture I suppose?Great Spell Counter support. Great effect and a perfect drawback.I'd run at least 2 of these in a Spell Counter deck. Somethings missing though...Just don't know what's holding me back to giving you a 10...9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 Thanks haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
touzaikokon Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 Effect: Sweet. Somewhat steep to pop a Synchro, but then again, you're getting HUGE amounts of Spell Counters, *cough*Endymion*cough* so it's okay. (3 points). Grammar: It's a unique card, so the wording is going to be a bit odd, understandably. Here's my attempt at a fix: "Remove 1 Spellcaster-Type Synchro Monster you control from play. Place Spell Counters on each card on the field equal to the number of Spell Counters already on them (if able). You cannot place Spell Counters on a card during your next turn." I think that should keep the effect the same as what you were trying to do. (1 point). Style: Awesome pic, and I like what you did with the card name. You should add a set name/number, it's the finishing touch. Otherwise, all clear. (2 points). Overall: 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 I really dont like how you commented on the lack of numbers and set name. I dont really add those unless Im adding it to YVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
touzaikokon Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 I really dont like how you commented on the lack of numbers and set name. I dont really add those unless Im adding it to YVD. It's one of my pet peeves. I think it adds to the card. You could throw on a set number like YVD-EN000 or something, I just like to see something in that space. If you really don't like it, though, add 1 to my rating. That would be my rating if I ignored that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 I really dont like how you commented on the lack of numbers and set name. I dont really add those unless Im adding it to YVD. It's one of my pet peeves. I think it adds to the card. You could throw on a set number like YVD-EN000 or something' date=' I just like to see something in that space. If you really don't like it, though, add 1 to my rating. That would be my rating if I ignored that.[/quote'] So how many does Josh has to add to your rating thanks to you bad fix of OCG? IT:I find this an interesting cardI just have 1 question Josh:Who is the boy in the back? <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.