The ReBeL Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 i hate when you try to help someone and u know they could do better but they want to do stuff on there own. One time my friend was like i got this deck and the flamvells and stardust work well. he won some games. a weak later he's like i got a yusei deck. i said you will fail and you need your flamvell assault deck back. he says why i aint going to a tourney. Wow the lameness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 sounds a bit like a few people here on YCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 They don't take advice because it's not good advice, or they're retarded. Than again, there's common sense. Obvious Flamvell will win over Yusei. Other than that, if you can't explain why it's good, it's not good advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 They don't take advice because it's not good advice' date=' or they're bad[which is rare']. If you can't explain why it's good, it's not good advice. or they're just idiots.your forgetting where we are..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 I edited my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 I had a very long-winded argument with someone on this very forum about Bora's superiority over Garuda the Wind Spirit. Their stance: "You can only Special Summon Garuda, making it better than Bora". Admittedly, he WAS only running Gale otherwise, but which is a better card: a semi-nomi 1600 beatstick that can change monsters' Battle Positions, or a 1700 piercing beatstick that has a SS condition, but isn't (Semi)Nomi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GraveHorizon Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 Advice I've given that wasn't heeded: having a deck with under 100 cards, not using outdated cards, and reading the rule book. Yet the noobs still consistently line up to get pwned with their awful, unusable, and somewhat illegal decks. I don't know why I continue to put up with it. Maybe because I don't have anything else to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 I had a very long-winded argument with someone on this very forum about Dora's superiority over Garuda the Wind Spirit. Their stance: "You can only Special Summon Garuda' date=' making it better than [b']D[/b]ora". Admittedly, he WAS only running Gale otherwise, but which is a better card: a semi-nomi 1600 beatstick that can change monsters' Battle Positions, or a 1700 piercing beatstick that has a SS condition, but isn't (Semi)Nomi? Fix'ed for the lolz. Anyways, I hate when you try to help someone and you know they could do better' date=' but they want to do stuff on the[b']ir[/b] own. One time my friend was like i got this deck and the flamvells and stardust work well. At this point, I can't Fix because your grammer is horrid. If you mean that that person has got a Yusei deck, but you are trying to convince him that Flamvell is better, there's a point there. Yusei only used a few good cards in the whole anime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 Depends on what kind of Yusei Deck.I once saw a very consistent Yusei SDDAM Deck before Quickdraw came out. It was friggin hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 Sounds like THe ReBeL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.