Gladiator Beast Bestiari

[byak]

This @3' date=' Gyzarus @0 and Konami release a good but not broken GB fusion, otherwise Glads die.

[/quote']

 

Preferably one that uses Retiari, so you don't have to destroy your own s/t when you summon Bestiari.

 

I remember thinking of one for Equeste.

[ihop]

This @3' date=' Gyzarus @0 and Konami release a good but not broken GB fusion, otherwise Glads die.

[/quote']

 

Preferably one that uses Retiari, so you don't have to destroy your own s/t when you summon Bestiari.

 

I remember thinking of one for Equeste.

 

That sounds alright too.

[Archlord Kristya]

A deck shouldn't be dependent on a broken card to be good.

 

I completely agree, Unfairnities *cough* cough*.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

i agree that Gyz should be a 0 and this goes back to 3. But first, Konami need to release another semi-decent Glad Fusion or Glads only really have Heraklinos.

[Manjoume Thunder]

Glads don't need Gyzarus to be good. I rarely see him on the field. IMO Glads will be better with 2x Bestiari (Running 3 will be dumb imo) and 0 Gyzarus. In that case, they would not need to hold their Bestiari and will have more s/t removal.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

Glads don't need Gyzarus to be good. I rarely see him on the field. IMO Glads will be better with 2x Bestiari (Running 3 will be dumb imo) and 0 Gyzarus. In that case' date=' they would not need to hold their Bestiari and will have more s/t removal.

[/quote']

 

really? i usually get Gyzarus 2-3 times per game......

i couldnt grasp running 3.... wouldnt feel right.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I'd rather have 2x Besti than Gyzarus... though both would be the best.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

both would be great.

 

i still reckon a new fusion could be good though.... one that maybe involves discarding...... since its the only thing they really havent covered.