Why is dandy draw more popular than QuickDraw turbo?

[000446027]

I have a quick draw turbo deck and am trying my best to stay away from lonefire and super nimble mega hampster. They seem to make the deck more likely to run like monarchs or plants and I feel that this defeats the whole purpose of using QuickDraw synchron. I want to continue making my deck as good as possible without straying away from my purpose. Here is my deck list. Please help and also answer the title question.

 

Monsters:

3 QuickDraw

3 debris

3 junk synchron

3 quillbolt

2 dandy

2 level eater

2 tuning ware

2 synchron explorer

1 sangan

1 card trooper

1 ryko

Total: 23

Spell:

2 pot of averice

Brain control

Mind control

One for one

Swords of revealing light

Heavy

Reinforcement of the army

Truenade

Foolish

Total: 10

Traps:

3 limit reverse

2 bottomless

Call of haunted

Mirror force

Total: 7

Extra deck:

Catastor

Junk warrior

Drill warrior

Iron chain

Turbo warrior

Goyo

ancient fairy dragon

Junk archer

Black rose

Nitro warrior

Stardust

2 junk destroyer

Road warrior

Red dragon archfiend

Total: 15

[byak]

Quickdraw never really was the "main" engine.

[Dr. Cakey]

I know exactly what you mean, but there's a flaw in your argument: Hamster and Lonefire, as well as LaDD and Caius, make it much better. Face the facts, because I haven't.