chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 My newest card, I quite like this one: [img]http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/2954/217615d.jpg[/img] When this card is Normal Summoned or Special Summoned successfully, it must remain in Attack Position. If this card is switched to Defence Position it is destroyed. As long as this card remains face-up on your side of the field, whenever your opponent declares an attack, this card must be selected as the attack target. During the End Phase of a turn this card was selected as an attack target, increase the ATK of this card by 500. This card cannot be destroyed as a result of battle. At the start of your Battle Phase you can discard 3 cards from your hand, to make all face-up Attack Position monsters your opponent controls, attack this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 Wow well it's a good staller. To say it's indestructable, it's got to have some disruption. Look at Spirit Reaper or Marshmallon, they do -1000 LP or discard 1 card. This is quite high ATK (lol) for a decoy monster. Plus I know it can only gain 500 per turn, regardless of a number of attacks, so within 2 turns, and 6 cards discarded, it's still 1700 ATK. I think 3 cards is a lot to lose really, maybe: [list] [*]Discard cards equal to the number of monsters you control... [*]Tribute 1 monster (other than this card)... [*]Tribute face-up Spell and Trap Cards you control equal to the number of monsters your opponent controls to... [/list] Looks good, I can only imagine this in a Frog Deck and being abused At least it's unaffected by the Field Spell (I think it targets only WATER Reptiles at LV 2 or lower). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 [quote name='LiAM' timestamp='1283355157' post='4588566'] Wow well it's a good staller. To say it's indestructable, it's got to have some disruption. Look at Spirit Reaper or Marshmallon, they do -1000 LP or discard 1 card. This is quite high ATK (lol) for a decoy monster. Plus I know it can only gain 500 per turn, regardless of a number of attacks, so within 2 turns, and 6 cards discarded, it's still 1700 ATK. I think 3 cards is a lot to lose really, maybe: [list] [*]Discard cards equal to the number of monsters you control... [*]Tribute 1 monster (other than this card)... [*]Tribute face-up Spell and Trap Cards you control equal to the number of monsters your opponent controls to... [/list] Looks good, I can only imagine this in a Frog Deck and being abused At least it's unaffected by the Field Spell (I think it targets only WATER Reptiles at LV 2 or lower). [/quote] Thanks for the great imput, the reason I went with three cards was to keep it from being overpowered I didnt want there to be a situation every turn where you could make your opponent attack so I went with three to make it more strategic. However when I get the feedback in I may look to revise it. Thanks for the feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archwing Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 My blandyness invades your post The picture is great, looks alittle simple but it just works soooo dang well. The effect is awsome. I cant say much about it but it really is....I think it might be bordering OPed with the whole It dosnt get destroyed AND gains ATK each turn thing.... Mabey limit how high its ATK can go? OCG looks good My blandyness rates your card at 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 [quote name='Archwing' timestamp='1283355583' post='4588589'] My blandyness invades your post The picture is great, looks alittle simple but it just works soooo dang well. The effect is awsome. I cant say much about it but it really is....I think it might be bordering OPed with the whole It dosnt get destroyed AND gains ATK each turn thing.... Mabey limit how high its ATK can go? OCG looks good My blandyness rates your card at 9/10 [/quote] Thanks interestingly enough this one was quite hard to ballance un terms of OP'd I wanted to steer away from the ATK limit because I like the fact that you opponent has a choice as to wether to attack in their battle phase so indirectly they have a say in how high the attack goes depending on how much they wish to attack. In the circumstance they dont attack and wait, I created the discard three card rule which i think made it fair and interesting. But as i said it was a hard card to ballance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom M.C. Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 seems pretty good to me, you could end up losing a lot of lp with this effect. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 Oh yeah, where did you get the name for this card? It's odd but a good odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 [quote name='LiAM' timestamp='1283364024' post='4588894'] Oh yeah, where did you get the name for this card? It's odd but a good odd. [/quote] Its latin It means "wonderous frog" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 Frog Decks doesn't need this thought :/ Effect is simple... but naah >_> not worthy thought oh... and it can't be target of Wetlands :3 due the fact that it isn't an Aqua-Type/WATER/Level 2 or lower monster :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 [quote name='wero-vasto' timestamp='1283371485' post='4589387'] Frog Decks doesn't need this thought :/ Effect is simple... but naah >_> not worthy thought oh... and it can't be target of Wetlands :3 due the fact that it isn't an Aqua-Type/WATER/Level 2 or lower monster :3 [/quote] Thanks for the imput... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 What do you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [quote name='chedbonlahor' timestamp='1283384718' post='4590471'] What do you think [/quote] It's horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [quote name='Zandaa Roaisu' timestamp='1283414938' post='4591695'] It's horrible. [/quote] I respect you oppinion however questionable it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [quote name='chedbonlahor' timestamp='1283427721' post='4591862'] I respect you oppinion however questionable it is. [/quote] It's horrible because every time it's attacked, you take damage. The attack gain is too little and the discarding effect is too high of a cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [b][size="2"]Compared to your other creations, This is good. <3 The pic XD [color="#00FF00"]7.8/10[/color][/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [quote name='.Ghost Rider' timestamp='1283447475' post='4592402'] [b][size="2"]Compared to your other creations, This is good. <3 The pic XD [color="#00FF00"]7.8/10[/color][/size][/b] [/quote] You havent really seen my other stuff but thanks, most of my stuff is like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [b][size="2"]Except for that random card you made. That needed work.[/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted September 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [quote name='.Ghost Rider' timestamp='1283461593' post='4593088'] [b][size="2"]Except for that random card you made. That needed work.[/size][/b] [/quote] Yes I was going through a blue phase where I was thinking outside the box most of my cards are like this or better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 [b][size="2"]Thats good to know. XD[/size][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.