Superdoopertrooper Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 ^ True This and PoD will go to 1 or 2. Konami make this world a terrible place to live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Played at 3, draw 6 opening hand. There is a 9/20 chance of drawing it. That's nearly 1/2. I can't believe I did that in my head in less than 20 seconds. Opening with it can really screw over your opponent's early-game strategy and it's lethal late-game. Very, very good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted September 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 What is the chance of opening with more than 1? Sorry for asking, but I lost the link to the ygo calculator and I am too lazy to do math outside of school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I skimmed the tawpik, and came across this: [quote name='THe ReBeL' timestamp='1284593542' post='4630278'] if you dont run this then run [b]hron of heaven[/b]. Quickdraw [i]warrior[/i] can use this well and in glads. [/quote] lolrebel What would be pretty hilarious, is Konami putting Solemn back@3 (or at least 2) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1285000566' post='4643171'] What is the chance of opening with more than 1? Sorry for asking, but I lost the link to the ygo calculator and I am too lazy to do math outside of school. [/quote] Well, that would be 9/20 x 9/20 which is 81/400. Nearly a 1/4 chance of starting with 2, basically. For 3 it would be 9/20[sup]3[/sup], which is 729/8000. About a 1/9 chance of starting with 3. Phew, that took me about 3 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 [quote name='Älfred-Kün' timestamp='1285003972' post='4643232'] Well, that would be 9/20 x 9/20 which is 81/400. Nearly a 1/4 chance of starting with 2, basically. For 3 it would be 9/20[sup]3[/sup], which is 729/8000. About a 1/9 chance of starting with 3. Phew, that took me about 3 minutes. [/quote] bulls***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTW (For The Wynn) Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 This card is an awesome card when played right. Early in the game this card is far better than Judgment, but late in the game Judgment is better than this. It is all about the timing. Overall though this card is better than Judgment and pwns almost anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaouJudai Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 I think with 3 you're looking at about a 40%+ chance of getting in opening. I posted that information over on Burnpsy's morph topic. Too lazy to link. But what I'm saying is it's common for TCG to abuse the hell outta good cards like that - and why shouldn't we? They left it at 3 didn't they? Get in your shenanigans while you still can before the hit. They viewed solemn judgment as balanced for a very long time and then the abuse started - still too lazy for links - (thinks to self... more coffee?) but when it was being ran at 3 from everything from Monarchs to GBs then kde had to do something. But this topic is about solemn warning. It's a great card. Just punishing. Royal Oppression on steroids and the spell speed 3 is worth the price. *edit* (sips coffee..mmmm dd french vanila ) Here you go guys: http://stattrek.com/Tables/Hypergeometric.aspx http://www.implair.com/deckulator/deckulator.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted September 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2010 Thanks for the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.