X-Man321 Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 hello and plesse at least netrul comets plesse [img][img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/94/221563.jpg[/img][/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠>:Stick-Man:<♠ Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 No card means no rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfFan16 Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/94/221563.jpg[/img] There's your card. Now to actually comment. Names(attribute type):NO fake types (and if you must please spell Saiyan correctly) Image: Pretty bad..no background=boring card Effect: way wrong. should be something like this: "If this card attacks a face-down Defense Position monster, destroy the monster immediately with this card's effect without flipping it face-up or applying damage calculation." ATK and DEF: personally i hate when monsters have anything other than 5 or 0 in the tens place but its your choice. it's very overpowered for it's level and because there are no summoning conditions Overall: 3/10. try again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 Among a number of things, from weird ATK/DEF points, a non-standard Type, and horrible OCG, there's one thing that bugs me the most... His power level [i]isn't over 9000[/i]! *shot* Joke aside, the card needs some reworking. Refer to other cards with more proper OCG to get an idea on how certain kinds of effects are worded. Unless this is intentionally a joke card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconBurger Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 WOOPS! Even i would recongnize a bad card when i focus it id say 2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hyde Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 This card....Is horrible in every shape and form ATK and DEF don't make any sense.... There's a pointless paragraph in the effect You spelled saiyan wrong... The effect may be worded as this...idk When this card attacks a monster whose DEF is higher than the ATK of this card, place 1 "Shield Break" Counter on the attacked monster (max. 4). A monster with a "Shield Break Counter" on it loses 500 DEF for each one on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Man321 Posted October 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [quote name='Gadjiltron' timestamp='1288489796' post='4751058'] Among a number of things, from weird ATK/DEF points, a non-standard Type, and horrible OCG, there's one thing that bugs me the most... His power level [i]isn't over 9000[/i]! *shot* Joke aside, the card needs some reworking. Refer to other cards with more proper OCG to get an idea on how certain kinds of effects are worded. Unless this is intentionally a joke card. [/quote] first of you can not have over 5000 or that(Atleast i heard that) so i codnt do that. And second thank you for telling me this [quote name='Nazo™' timestamp='1288491051' post='4751110'] This card....Is horrible in every shape and form ATK and DEF don't make any sense.... There's a pointless paragraph in the effect You spelled saiyan wrong... The effect may be worded as this...idk When this card attacks a monster whose DEF is higher than the ATK of this card, place 1 "Shield Break" Counter on the attacked monster (max. 4). A monster with a "Shield Break Counter" on it loses 500 DEF for each one on it. [/quote] Thanks [quote name='WolfFan16' timestamp='1288486447' post='4750970'] [img]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/94/221563.jpg[/img] There's your card. Now to actually comment. Names(attribute type):NO fake types (and if you must please spell Saiyan correctly) Image: Pretty bad..no background=boring card Effect: way wrong. should be something like this: "If this card attacks a face-down Defense Position monster, destroy the monster immediately with this card's effect without flipping it face-up or applying damage calculation." ATK and DEF: personally i hate when monsters have anything other than 5 or 0 in the tens place but its your choice. it's very overpowered for it's level and because there are no summoning conditions Overall: 3/10. try again [/quote] howed you find it also what shoul Gokus type be then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Мερhilεs Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [color="#800080"][b][center]Warrior would be a good type. http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=§ion=&global=1&q=goku#/dd0zaf <--- Here's a rather good pic. You might just have to crop it though...[/center][/b][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recteik Shade Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 WTF!? What is this first off the OCG is just aweful. Second The Pic sux. Honestly of all the DBZ pics online thats the one you chose. And lastly if anything you would call Goku a Warrior_Type. not a Saiyan. The ATK i get cuz you cant make it as high as Goku's true power without Photoshop or gimp. but remember Goku goes to Super Saiyan 4 so This plain ordinary Goku should have a realtivly low ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaster_rogue Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 hello I'm coming back to YCM, after a long time, I'm sorry, this card isn't good, but you can get better, OK real type is a good idea, and you should try to look for some OCG help... I won't give a rate for you...Sorry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis atherton Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 sorry but pretty much everything about this card is wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Man321 Posted November 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Thanks for all your help. i'm changeing soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.