Jump to content

Dragon Synchro/Fusion Support


Dementuo

Recommended Posts

Always used Dragons. Always had them as my main deck.

MONSTERS:
The White Stone of Legend x3
Stardust Xiaolong
Decoy Dragon
Totem Dragon
Dread Dragon x2
Exploder Dragon
Masked Dragon x3
Delta Flyer
Dandylion x2
Mirage Dragon
Red-Eyes Wyvren x2
Debris Dragon x2
Strong Wind Dragon
Prime Material Dragon
Blue-Eyes White Dragon x3
Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon x2

SPELLS:
One for One
Monster Reborn
Book of Moon
Shrink
Dark Hole
Lightning Vortex
Smashing Ground
Giant Trunade
Bait Doll
Swords of Revealing Light
Polymerization
Future Fusion
Dragon's Mirror

TRAPS:
Dimensional Prison
Dark Bribe x2
Mirror Force
Bottomless Trap Hole x2
Magic Cylinder
Torrential Tribute
Call of the Haunted
Scrap-Iron Scarecrow

EXTRA DECK:
Stardust Dragon
Red Dragon Archfiend
Black-Winged Dragon
Black Rose Dragon
Ancient Fiary Dragon
Shooting Star Dragon
Red Nova Dragon
Formula Synchron
Gaia Knight, the Force of Earth
Iron Chain Dragon
X-Saber Wayne
Trident Dragion
Exploder Dragonwing x2
Dragon Knight Draco-Equiste x2
Five-Headed Dragon
Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon

I know that the Extra Deck goes over the limit. I usually side a few of those cards. Here's my normal Side Deck:
Tuner's Scheme
Vanguard of the Dragon
Super Polymerization
Troop Dragon x2

That's pretty much it for now. I might update this deck once a new ban list comes out, but for now, enjoy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trust me... It will run a lot better when you fix it. I have dueled people who say they win all the time with 100 card decks (which are actually illegal), and they say they win all the time against other people. But that's only due to luck, or your opponent's being really bad at playing/having only crappy cards.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) I find it hard to believe that I can't post a legal deck here. (FIXED)
2) I play Magic in EDH formatting, so I'm used to a larger deck.
3) Going back to 1. The limit is 60 cards. I can't fathom that I would be required to post only 50 card decks, when the limit is 10 cards more. (FIXED, though I still find it strange that the limit would be 50)
4) I understand you trying to help, but I'm fine. I'll look over the rules again. (Done)
5) So you duel against 100 card decks? Ok. Doesn't change anything about me.I go up against a bunch of different decks, and none of them are bad. Most of them are actually pretty good.
6) Refering to 5. If you want to badmouth me or my opponents, then please, get out of here. This forum doesn't deserve that kind of disrespectful talk. Of course, it's your choice to stay, but I would appreciate you being a little bit more considerate of how others might feel.
7) I appreciate the help, again, but seeing as neither of you are staff, I think I'll be fine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dementuo' timestamp='1291187601' post='4821963']
1) I find it hard to believe that I can't post a legal deck here. (FIXED)
2) I play Magic in EDH formatting, so I'm used to a larger deck.
3) Going back to 1. The limit is 60 cards. I can't fathom that I would be required to post only 50 card decks, when the limit is 10 cards more. (FIXED, though I still find it strange that the limit would be 50)
4) I understand you trying to help, but I'm fine. I'll look over the rules again. (Done)
5) So you duel against 100 card decks? Ok. Doesn't change anything about me.I go up against a bunch of different decks, and none of them are bad. Most of them are actually pretty good.
6) Refering to 5. If you want to badmouth me or my opponents, then please, get out of here. This forum doesn't deserve that kind of disrespectful talk. Of course, it's your choice to stay, but I would appreciate you being a little bit more considerate of how others might feel.
7) I appreciate the help, again, but seeing as neither of you are staff, I think I'll be fine.
[/quote]
1. While you are legally allowed to have a 60-card deck, and it is a rule to have 50 or less cards in a deck here, it is must more consistent to use a 40-45 card deck. You are a lot less likely to draw into hands of all a certain type of card, your deck is more likely to draw its key cards, you draw limited and semi-limited cards a lot easier, and you are more likely to pull of your combos. That is why people almost always post 40-card decks.
2. That's fine, but YGO is a different game. Keep that in mind.
3. Nothing really needs to be said...
5. My local toruneys were always half-filled with decks over 50 cards, and those decks never made it to the final 4. Even the ones with around 50. It's my experience that those decks are usually too inconsistent with their strategies.
6. I'm not trying to badmouth anybody, I'm just trying to say that things are different than they can seem sometimes. When I was in middle school and dueling, everyone used decks 60+ cards and there was always a winning deck, but as we matured we found that smaller decks worked a lot better.
7. Just because we're not Staff doesn't mean our advice isn't valid. We're only trying to help you, and keep you from having to be talked to by Staff...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1291188845' post='4821970']
1. While you are legally allowed to have a 60-card deck, and it is a rule to have 50 or less cards in a deck here, it is must more consistent to use a 40-45 card deck. You are a lot less likely to draw into hands of all a certain type of card, your deck is more likely to draw its key cards, you draw limited and semi-limited cards a lot easier, and you are more likely to pull of your combos. That is why people almost always post 40-card decks.
[b]I know this. But thanks for trying to help.[/b]
2. That's fine, but YGO is a different game. Keep that in mind.
[b]I do. That still doesn't change anything, though.[/b]
3. Nothing really needs to be said...
5. My local toruneys were always half-filled with decks over 50 cards, and those decks never made it to the final 4. Even the ones with around 50. It's my experience that those decks are usually too inconsistent with their strategies.
[b]I can imagine, yet my deck never does that. In my 6 years of using this deck, I've lost, on average, a good 1/20 of the time.[/b]
6. I'm not trying to badmouth anybody, I'm just trying to say that things are different than they can seem sometimes. When I was in middle school and dueling, everyone used decks 60+ cards and there was always a winning deck, but as we matured we found that smaller decks worked a lot better.
[b]I understand that, and once again, I appreciate the help. However, I'm fine with my current deck.[/b]
7. Just because we're not Staff doesn't mean our advice isn't valid. We're only trying to help you, and keep you from having to be talked to by Staff...
[b]This, I understand. I never said your advice wasn't valid. I apologize if that was the message you got, as that wasn't my intent. For a third time now, I appreciate the help.[/b]
[/quote]

I prefer not to argue about such trivial things, so what say we just leave this issue alone? I'd rather here a bit about how my deck could be improved, besides removing cards. That's why I posted it here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dementuo' timestamp='1291189713' post='4821986']
I'd rather here a bit about how my deck could be improved, [b]besides removing cards[/b]. That's why I posted it here.
[/quote]

If you mean

A) that we can take out any number of cards in the deck, so long as we leave the exact amount of cards in the deck total, then I can work with that.

B) that we cannot remove ANY of the cards at all, and only add cards, then we have a problem. Adding cards would only make the deck even more inconsistent, and (as I haven't done a total count of the deck) we would only be able to add <10 cards anyway.

Also, I can't seem to identify your true win condition. I know it has something to do with Dragons, but does it centralize around beatdown using REDMD, or does it use Drago-equeste, or what?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer to not have people floodin this thread with "You need to take cards out" and stuff like that. That's really my only problem.

About the win conditions... It's a complicated deck. There really isn't one, but I usually go for Shooting Star or Red Nova as soon as I can.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Removing unneeded cards is key to improving the deck. Nevertheless, I'll TRY to stick to that insistence.

- Polymerization (I see the combo with 3 White Stones, but it's too inconsistent, especially at 1)
- Bait Doll (Funny card, but returns to the deck, and your deck is big enough as it is)
- Decoy Dragon

+ Dragon's Mirror (2 is better than 1)
+ Mystical Space Typhoon (...just better)
+ Foolish Burial
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That...
I guess it's alright.
I'll think about the Poly, Bait Doll has always been a friend to me, but I see your reasoning.
Decoy Dragon, I need to keep. It works too well as a defense, since half of my strategy is spamming the REDMD revival effect to synchro quickly.
MST, I know I need one.
A second Dragon's Mirror? I might need throw that in.
Foolish Burial? I am an idiot for not thinking of that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decoy Dragon is horrible. Even with your high level dragons, there's so many ways around it that it's not even funny. At most, it'll provide a shield for a turn or two, and you only have one, so you're banking on them not having a counter when you play it, and you having REDMD, a Dragon Synchro, or a Blue-Eyes in the graveyard.

Also, your deck has very little drawpower, makng your insistence of 50 cards even more problematic in terms of speed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...