EXCESS - Lady and her bed of roses

[Icy]

[center][img]http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9986/18055.jpg[/img][img]http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/9986/18055.jpg[/img]

[quote='Lady Aumaries Effect']When this card is Excess Summoned, add 1 Equip Spell Card from your Deck to your hand for each Overlaid Monster on this card. During the Battle Phase you can send to the Graveyard 1 Overlaid Card on this card to negate the effect of your Opponent's Spell or Trap Card and remove it from play. Your Opponent then looses 1000 Life Points.[/quote][/center]

Edit: Forgotten Red Roses: The returned Excess Monster is to be returned to the Deck, seriously disastrous typo.

[Demon wolf]

I don't even know what an "Excess" monster is!!!!!!!!!! Can't judge on what I don't know

[Smesh]

I actually really like this. It has support behind it and has its uses. The only thing i can see wrong with it is the fact that since they know they'll get damage from activating a card effect on it, they won't. Ex: Lady Aumarie attacks, Opponent has face-down Negate Attack, they just won't use it.

@Demon wolf: http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/232387-exceed-summon/

[Anbu-of-Sand]

[color=blue][b]Lady Aumarie[/b][/color]

[b]OCG / Common Sense:[/b]
When this card is Excess Summoned, add 1 Equip Spell Card to your hand for each Overlaid Monster under this card. If this card attacks, and is affected by an [b]o[/b]pponent's card effect[b],[/b] you can negate that effect and remove [b]the card[/b] from play by [b]discarding[/b] 1 Overlaid Monster under this card. Your [b]o[/b]pponent then loses 1000 Life Points.

*Note: Discarding remains the same, seeing I don't know what is the appropriate term as of right now. Perhaps sending?

[b]Effect / Usefulness:[/b]
The first effect is great, seeing you can either get a minimal amount of 2 Free Equips, with I believe a maximum amount of 3. 6 if you can use monsters on your opponent's side of the field that is. The second effect confused me at first, but is quite helpful from protecting this card from cards such as Mirror Force. Your opponent then loses a sweet 1000 due to their choice of actions. How dare they affect this card >:O The uses in the current Meta are questionable, but perhaps has it's own uses in it's own Deck. However, like what Smesh said, if your opponent knows they'll get hit by 1000 and the possibly chance that the monster won't get removed from the field if it has a monster under it, eh.

[b]Originality / Balance:[/b]
Originality to the max, well, it is an Excess Monster, of course it's original. However, I feel it's underpowered, being a Level 6 and yet such the poor stats. Unless I'm missing something that is. Perhaps increase the ATK to at least 1800? That way it has a fighting chance against those Level 4's xD, excluding the occasional 1900 Level 4 beaters and whatnot.

[b]Ratings:[/b]
OCG / Common Sense: 1.5/2
Effect / Usefulness: 2.8/4
Originality / Balance: 2.7/4
[b]Overall: 7/10[/b]

Will rate the other ASAP

[Demon wolf]

I still don't know what a Excess monster is!!!! Someone PM what it means plz so I can rate

[Anbu-of-Sand]

[quote name='Demon wolf' timestamp='1292639402' post='4860431']
I still don't know what a Excess monster is!!!! Someone PM what it means plz so I can rate
[/quote]
Read the link Smesh sent / teh stickied thread in this Forum >.>

[Icy]

[quote name='Demon wolf' timestamp='1292639402' post='4860431']
I still don't know what a Excess monster is!!!! Someone PM what it means plz so I can rate
[/quote]

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/232776-cc-excess-community-tournament/
All the info is in there XD.

[Demon wolf]

OK I get it know, to behonest, very orginal and very good (I'm not saying this since I'm new to this Excess stuff) 9.5/10

[Anbu-of-Sand]

[color=blue][b]Forgotten Red Roses[/b][/color]

[b]OCG / Common Sense:[/b]
level = Level

[b]Effect / Usefulness:[/b]
The card targets an Excess Monster with no monsters overlaid with it, it lets you return 1 Excess Monster from your Graveyard or Removed From Play to wait, WHERE OH WHERE DOES IT GO!?!?! I'll just assume it's the Deck, then letting you draw 2 cards in return. In addition, any monsters that were drawn that were under the Level of the selected Excess Monster go wait, WHICH SELECTED EXCESS MONSTER!?!?! Lots of tiny little errors that can confuse people in this card, but I'll just assume it's the monster on the field. Letting you add any monsters that were under the Level as the monster on the field underneath the monster as a new Overlaid Monster. It's quite useful for Excess Decks I suppose, not much to say as of now.

[b]Originality / Balance:[/b]
It's semi-original to be honest. The first effect somewhat reminds me of a mini Pot of Avarice or Something, letting you return a card from wherever to (I assume) the Deck, then letting you draw X amount of cards. Only thing that makes it original is the Excess part. The card seems balanced, seeing theres a chance you can give one of your Excess monsters two free Overlays. That part though is somewhat all about luck.

[b]Ratings:[/b]
OCG / Common Sense: 2/2
Effect / Usefulness: 3.5/4
Originality / Balance: 3.3/4
[b]Overall: 8.8/10[/b]

[~{Rochster}~]

[quote name='Anbu-of-Sand' timestamp='1292643995' post='4860624']
[color=blue][b]Forgotten Red Roses[/b][/color]

[b]OCG / Common Sense:[/b]
level = Level

[b]Effect / Usefulness:[/b]
The card targets an Excess Monster with no monsters overlaid with it, it lets you return 1 Excess Monster from your Graveyard or Removed From Play to wait, WHERE OH WHERE DOES IT GO!?!?! I'll just assume it's the Deck, then letting you draw 2 cards in return. In addition, any monsters that were drawn that were under the Level of the selected Excess Monster go wait, WHICH SELECTED EXCESS MONSTER!?!?! Lots of tiny little errors that can confuse people in this card, but I'll just assume it's the monster on the field. Letting you add any monsters that were under the Level as the monster on the field underneath the monster as a new Overlaid Monster. It's quite useful for Excess Decks I suppose, not much to say as of now.

[b]Originality / Balance:[/b]
It's semi-original to be honest. The first effect somewhat reminds me of a mini Pot of Avarice or Something, letting you return a card from wherever to (I assume) the Deck, then letting you draw X amount of cards. Only thing that makes it original is the Excess part. The card seems balanced, seeing theres a chance you can give one of your Excess monsters two free Overlays. That part though is somewhat all about luck.

[b]Ratings:[/b]
OCG / Common Sense: 2/2
Effect / Usefulness: 3.5/4
Originality / Balance: 3.3/4
[b]Overall: 8.8/10[/b]
[/quote]
This.

[Icy]

Bump?

[senatheEND]

issue That monster wont work u need "This card cannot be normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Exceed Summoned from the hand." to let the user know it has to be summoned by exceed also if u remove a card from under the exceed monster it will be destroyed cause the levels no longer match that cards. ALSO u don't discard overlayed cards u send them to the graveyard since they are on the field already.

1/10

[Icy]

Technical Flaws SenathEND. Nothing relating to the effects themselves, or the ideas behind them.

[War Chess]

Even though i don't understand excess, i loved it !
This protection effect she has is good and at a fair cost+burn !
The spell is cool beause it increases draw and gives a chance to monsters like the lady to re-use their effects.
Also, I loved the pictures !
10/10

[senatheEND]

Im 100% sure when they are released this will be the first thing covered so might as well start following Common sense rules. If the monster can only be summon by having 2 or more monsters whos levels equal its own then it makes sense that the card would be destroyed if a "underlayed" card was removed from under it. Also it is 100% related cause the effect dont work U will destroy her if u remove a card under her and if she is off the field u cant activate the spell.

[Icy]

I am well aware of that flaw (noticed it afterwards; I tend to rush out effects rather than care for nitpicky stuff as long as the rulings can be interpreted fine). Yet everyone but you seems to understand it and give it a low rating due to a technical flaw. I'll fix it when the image servers are back up for the site where I grabbed the image (they're currently doing a reset).

Now, comment on the idea and effect rather than the wording?

@War Chess: Thanks ^^

[senatheEND]

Its a pretty big flaw if ur posting it in realistic and i did rate the effect. 1/10 cause its not useable maybe if she had u discard a card, and even then its broke cause u can use it more then once

[Althemia]

[quote name='senatheEND' timestamp='1292803492' post='4865846']
Its a pretty big flaw if ur posting it in realistic and i did rate the effect. 1/10 cause its not useable maybe if she had u discard a card, and even then its broke cause u can use it more then once
[/quote]

It's fine, learn to play the game. It's perfectly usable in a deck like Ben Kei, Power Tool or Vairon. Toughen up before you play with the big dogs, scrub. It's also balanced, Equip Decks are relatively weak and this wouldn't be broken considering that.

Learn. To. Play.

Um... I guess that can count as the review of the first card, Josh. You know I'm lazy. >>

2nd card is... Wow. I really like it. However, something tells me that it'd soon become broken when Excess Monsters are released. But at the minute, it seems really nice. Good job, Josh. <3

[Buttercup]

lady thingy

1. Where are the equips added from?
2. How do Exceeds work with Book? *assumes IT KILLS EVERYTHING* Book and E-Con immunity, Equip Spell tutoring and 1K BURN are minor yays in the face of fiddly summoning conditions and bad stats.

rose thingy

pot of greed is ok, situational stuff is balanced out by it being pot of greed. Chainability would be nice tho- pot of greed AND costless double MBAAS for all removal is coolios (assumes it returns exceeds to the deck)

your text is so unclear

[Icy]

>_<"... I made a lot of typo's rushing this out.
Anything that ISN'T mentioned where from = comes from deck.

[War Chess]

Could you turn these into a set ? An archetype of excess monsters maybe ?

[Toffee.]

Icy, can I suggest you remove the "under this card" part of the overlay effect?
Not to seem like a grammar nazi, but [i]OVER[/i]laying cards [i]underneath[/i] a card sounds like it contradicts itself and/or is an oxymoron O,o
I mean you dont really need to include that 1 bit of text, as the "overlaid" cards go underneath/on-top of the card anyway
(I dunno', it just seems a little confusing imo. I'm still kinda' waiting to see Excess monsters in action/on the anime)

[quote name='senatheEND' timestamp='1292803094' post='4865825']
if u remove a card from under the exceed monster it will be destroyed cause the levels no longer match that cards.
[/quote]
The 'overlaid' cards are more like "shields", in which it takes more effort to remove the main monster from the field.

[senatheEND]

[quote name='Kokonoe' timestamp='1292872362' post='4868062']
It's fine, learn to play the game. It's perfectly usable in a deck like Ben Kei, Power Tool or Vairon. Toughen up before you play with the big dogs, scrub. It's also balanced, Equip Decks are relatively weak and this wouldn't be broken considering that.

Learn. To. Play.

Um... I guess that can count as the review of the first card, Josh. You know I'm lazy. >>

2nd card is... Wow. I really like it. However, something tells me that it'd soon become broken when Excess Monsters are released. But at the minute, it seems really nice. Good job, Josh. <3
[/quote]
Your the scrub just cause u might like him or be found of him doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a harsh rating when he makes a bad card. "If this card attacks and is affected by an Opponents card effect [color="#FF0000"]you can negate that effect and remove it from play by discarding 1 Overlaid Monster under this card."[/color]
Is the line in question due to the fact that Exceed monsters [size="5"]CAN ONLY[/size] be summoned on top of 2 or more monsters with a level Equal to its own. You need to learn how to read rather then blindly give praise to a card that will just nuke itself.

[Icy]

Kay Senate, I am awfully tired of you. And I have corrected much of my card, as well as tweaked it a little.

[list]
[*][quote]That monster wont work u need "This card cannot be normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Exceed Summoned from the hand." to let the user know it has to be summoned by exceed also if u remove a card from under the exceed monster it will be destroyed cause the levels no longer match that cards. ALSO u don't discard overlayed cards u send them to the graveyard since they are on the field already.[/quote]
That would be incorrect and mere speculation. Until Excess Monsters are released, I ask that people NOT post technical Excess Monster effects, as we do not know how Konami will finish designing them. So we do not [b]NEED[/b] it is rightfully assumed. Like if you ever had Fusion or Synchro Monsters in your Deck, same assumption.
[*][quote]Im 100% sure when they are released this will be the first thing covered so might as well start following Common sense rules. If the monster can only be summon by having 2 or more monsters whos levels equal its own then it makes sense that the card would be destroyed if a "underlayed" card was removed from under it. Also it is 100% related cause the effect dont work U will destroy her if u remove a card under her and if she is off the field u cant activate the spell.[/quote]
I have corrected that apparently "major" flaw, even though you could easily see through it. And for that I thank you.
[*][quote]Its a pretty big flaw if ur posting it in realistic and i did rate the effect. 1/10 cause its not useable maybe if she had u discard a card, and even then its broke cause u can use it more then once [/quote]
She is by design, level 6. Incredibly low stats by any standard for such a requirement, for the ability to search up to 3 Equip Spells from the Deck (a majority of your cards will be dumped just trying to SS an Excess Monster). Not to mention the Natural Abilities of Excess Monsters, it only causes negation and helps out Equip Spell decks like the one's listed by Kokonoe. Hardly broken at all, since out of ALL the protectors like it, you can avoid this one the most (and it's subject to traditional negation as well; the effect is not continuous).

In fact right now, "Lady Aumarie" is tragically underpowered.
[/list]

And your last reply was merely spamming, and turned your replies into borderline flaming with that last reply.
[center][i]- Knowingly replying to a thread with negative behavior despite being explained to, and further going by and harassing members inside it (in this case Kokonoe).[/i][/center]
Either you really are an ignorant person, or you are trolling. At the benefit of everyone else, I will go with the latter. So enjoy your 1 week ban, and Merry Christmas.