Gusta Support

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[center][IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/b8lj0o.jpg[/IMG]
[i]Return 2 "Gusta" monsters in your Graveyard to your Deck to add 1 "Gusta" Tuner monster from your Graveyard to your hand. If this face-down card on the field is destroyed, you can return 1 Tuner monster from your Graveyard to your Deck and shuffle it.[/i][/center]

[Zektor]

7/10 because I really need to see other Gusta monsters

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Yugioh Wikia them.

Their Psychic / Winged Beast archetype that are OTK/FTK based. The Tuners are Winged Beasts from Lvl 1 - 3 and have effects that SS other Gustas from the deck when their destroyed either by battle or in general or by card effect. The non-Tuners are Psychic. Their synchros are Psychic as well. Their spells and traps both use adding 2 Gustas back to deck from the Graveyard as a cost to activate them. Some gustas do that as well, like Calm, the Silent Gusta. By returning 2 from the graveyard to the Deck you can draw 1 card.

[Zektor]

they are gusto BTW, anyway now that I know what the Gustos are 9/10

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Gusto is spawn of the gawd forsaken idiots of TCG. The screwed up the names. To me their still Gusta (Their OCG name).
Thanks.

[Mehmani]

[quote name='♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥' timestamp='1295751327' post='4953346']
Gusto is spawn of the gawd forsaken idiots of TCG. The screwed up the names. To me their still Gusta (Their TCG name).
Thanks.
[/quote]

We are not "gawd forsaken idiots". We know more than you and we are better than you. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Gusto They are called Gusto in the TCG and Gusta in the OCG. Once again, you are wrong (Gusta does sounds better, but factually you are wrong and demonstrating the pseudo-intellectual stuff I hate).

Gustos are mainly known for their FTK. This card doesn't support the FTK at all, so that rules something out. A pure Gusto deck (not FTK), as you said, revolves around effects that return other Gustos from the Graveyard to the deck. If you had actually thought about the archetype when making this card then you would have made a card that is more fitting. Gustos need a very reliable way of getting them to the Graveyard so you can activate their effects. A logical person who really cared about what they are making would have thought it over and decided "Hmm! I think something like an archetype-specific Foolish Burial would make the deck faster and more consistent!"

Gusto Wind Factory [Quick-Play Spell Card]
Return 1 "Gusto" monster in your hand to your Deck. Send 1 "Gusto" monster from your Deck to the Graveyard. If this face-down card is destroyed, you can discard 1 "Gusto" monster from your hand and send 1 "Gusto" monster from your Deck to the Graveyard.

Your card is mediocre and quite bland. It just seems like a generic card that's had Gusto stuff tacked on to it. Returning two cards is steep cost in a deck that relies on the Graveyard as a win condition. You will most likely draw into a Tuner before you even need to use this card, and once you have got out a Daigusto Synchro you won't need to bother with synching any more unless it dies very quickly. Your card is situational, mine is multi-purpose.

2/10.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[quote name='Mikhail Tal' timestamp='1295817420' post='4955143']
We are not "gawd forsaken idiots". We know more than you and we are better than you.[b]Not really. I wasn't refering to their intelligence but their name changes.[/b] http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Gusto They are called Gusto in the TCG and Gusta in the OCG.[b]I was typing fast so I put TCG instead of OCG. I already know Gusta is the OCG name[/b] Once again, you are wrong (Gusta does sounds better, but factually you are wrong and demonstrating the pseudo-intellectual stuff I hate). [b]Lol your wrong. I'm not pretending to be intelligent, I was just telling him what I thought of them as[/b]

Gustos are mainly known for their FTK. This card doesn't support the FTK at all, so that rules something out. A pure Gusto deck (not FTK), as you said, revolves around effects that return other Gustos from the Graveyard to the deck. If you had actually thought about the archetype when making this card then you would have made a card that is more fitting. [b]I didn't make this for FTK support.[/b] Gustos need a very reliable way of getting them to the Graveyard so you can activate their effects. A logical person who really cared about what they are making would have thought it over and decided "Hmm! I think something like an archetype-specific Foolish Burial would make the deck faster and more consistent!"

Gusto Wind Factory [Quick-Play Spell Card]
Return 1 "Gusto" monster in your hand to your Deck. Send 1 "Gusto" monster from your Deck to the Graveyard. If this face-down card is destroyed, you can discard 1 "Gusto" monster from your hand and send 1 "Gusto" monster from your Deck to the Graveyard.
[b]Again I'm not supporting the FTK.[/b]

Your card is mediocre and quite bland. [b]Cool~[/b] It just seems like a generic card that's had Gusto stuff tacked on to it. [b]Awesome~[/b] Returning two cards is steep cost in a deck that relies on the Graveyard as a win condition. You will most likely draw into a Tuner before you even need to use this card, and once you have got out a Daigusto Synchro you won't need to bother with synching any more unless it dies very quickly. Your card is situational, mine is multi-purpose.

2/10.
[/quote]
Wow~
You seem to think I care about FTK. I don't this card was made for the OTK of Diagusta Sphered. I quite honestly don't care whether you think it's bad or not since you couldn't even see the reason why I made it. As long as I'm fine with it it's perfect just the way it is. I have a life =/ I'm not gonna be all psycho for a TCG and get irrationally pissy when someone just because they aren't as into it as I am.

Thanks for the comment :3~

The OTK requires the monsters to be in the Deck so be SS when the tuners are destroyed by battle. That's why this card focuses on returning them.

[Mehmani]

[b]You really, really don't understand. You just say "lol your wrong lol" and then provide an inadequate explanation. You respond like a primary school child, ignoring and cherry-picking when you want to and just posting one word responses. I will go through each of your answers.[/b]

"Not really. I wasn't refering to their intelligence but their name changes." - [b]This is an utterly bland and downright confusing comment that somehow implies that changing your name makes you an idiot. Maybe if you bothered to explain why it does so?[/b]

"Lol your wrong. I'm not pretending to be intelligent, I was just telling him what I thought of them as." - [b]You were wrong, typo or not. You said that Gusta was their OCG name. That is an incorrect, or wrong statement. I was correct then and I am correct now.[/b]

"I didn't make this for FTK support." - [b]We already gathered that. But if you had bothered to read that paragraph (which you clearly didn't), you would see that I ALREADY said that. I then immediately went on to discuss how the card doesn't even fit a normal Gusto deck and how you clearly didn't think about how to support the archetype. You ignored that entirely. You ignored that entire paragraph because you either couldn't be bothered or you knew it was a meaningful argument. [/b]

"Again I'm not supporting the FTK." - [b]You are an absolute idiot. You clearly don't understand the Gusto archetype or how they work at all. That card that I made support a pure Gusto deck, not the bloody FTK. But you didn't read it, or the paragraph explaining everything for that matter. Or maybe you did and you just ignored it. This is a clear example of someone mindlessly posting a card claiming to be support and it's nothing of the sort. Bad and ignorant reviewers are the problem with CC today - you are their food.[/b]

"Cool~ Awesome~." - [b]I am unsure if you understood what I was saying and then ignored it on purpose, but I think I'm giving you far too much intellectual credit there. I think you don't have the horsepower or the determination to bother to read let alone understand what I am saying. But I could be wrong. You could be very clever and ignoring what I'm saying because it is evidence of you being bad.[/b]

You seem to think I care about FTK. [b]No, I don't. I deduced that almost immediately after looking at the card.[/b] I don't this card was made for the OTK of Diagusta Sphered. [b]It wasn't and I never said it was.[/b] I quite honestly don't care whether you think it's bad or not since you couldn't even see the reason why I made it. [b]I don't think anyone other than you could, and that's a testament to how useless and situational the card is. Please, do care to actually explain how you use it.[/b] As long as I'm fine with it it's perfect just the way it is. [b]So you are saying you don't care about criticism or feedback at all. As you as think it's fine then it magically is. In Showcase you get banned and have abuse hurled at you for saying that.[/b] I have a life =/ I'm not gonna be all psycho for a TCG and get irrationally pissy when someone just because they aren't as into it as I am. [b]I like the game. I find it quite interesting, so much so that I think I can have a crack at making it more interesting. You clearly don't understand the game and from what you yourself have said it seems you don't even want to. You are the exact kind of cardmaker that is killing CC - like a pseudoscientist, you seem to be superficially correct, but as soon as anyone looks deeper you are uncovered for what you really are - fraudulent with a touch of inferiority complex.[/b]

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[quote name='Mikhail Tal' timestamp='1295889992' post='4957400']
[b]You really, really don't understand. You just say "lol your wrong lol" and then provide an inadequate explanation. You respond like a primary school child, ignoring and cherry-picking when you want to and just posting one word responses. I will go through each of your answers.[/b][u]Go ahead (: I'll just ignore them as you're clearly just doing so for argument sake and I'm not going to stoop to your level (; and anyways you obviously cannot understand what I'm saying so there is no point in trying to explain. If you were as intelligent as you so desperately try to portray, then you'd understand.[/u]
[/quote]
Thanks for commenting

[Mehmani]

"Go ahead (: I'll just ignore them as you're clearly just doing so for argument sake and I'm not going to stoop to your level (; and anyways you obviously cannot understand what I'm saying so there is no point in trying to explain. If you were as intelligent as you so desperately try to portray, then you'd understand."

I'm not doing it for the sake of having the argument, I'm doing it because I think you are a terrible cardmaker and an infuriating person and I have clear evidence to back it up. You are just ignoring because (dare I say) you are too scared to look at the evidence. That's an utterly ambiguous comment that contributes nothing and makes you look stupid. You just can't be bothered to even look at what I am saying. I think this needs to be discussed with a higher authority, but that's not possible as CC thinks you're a genius.

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

[quote name='Mikhail Tal' timestamp='1295907795' post='4958064']
I'm not doing it for the sake of having the argument, I'm doing it because I think you are a terrible cardmaker and an infuriating person [b]Lol which means you have a one track mind of trying to bring me down through argument. You're so bias that your comments in my threads can hardly be taken seriously so why should I bother? (:[/b] and I have clear evidence to back it up. [b]Oooh~ Good for you![/b] You are just ignoring because (dare I say) you are too scared to look at the evidence.[b]Or because I don't feel like reading through 80 lines of complaints and anger (:[/b] That's an utterly ambiguous comment that contributes nothing and makes you look stupid.[b]Lol thats another thing to add to my ever growing list of "Stupid Things I've Said". That's what...453? Any more? I'm trying to make it to 1000 but the end of May ;D![/b] You just can't be bothered to even look at what I am saying.[b]Yea =/ I get bored when someone constantly complains about the same thing over and over and over again.[/b] I think this needs to be discussed with a higher authority, but that's not possible as CC thinks you're a genius. [b]Really =D? That makes me feel special! Thanks CC ^^ You're too kind :3[/b]
[/quote]

Wow :3 this is gettin pretty spammy~

Also >> If your not doing it for the sake of argument...Then why purse this convo? You've already told me what you think and everything so it's over. No need to continue, yet you are.

[..:Spitfire:..]

I like the card, but the template looks eew. That's Calm in the picture, right?
I don't think the "and shuffle it" at the end of the effect is really necessary.
Gustas are kind of new to me, I haven't really looked that much into them, but I will! Eventually...

[Skythief]

This could open new options for Gusta/o. Comparable with Blackwings recycling Vayu, this can recycle a Tuner of your choice. I don't see the point of making a Gusta "Foolish Burial" as there are enough ways to mill gustas fast by being a bit creative, main some Rykos, or other Lightsworn cards (but Ryko is best as the support reaches outside of the Lightsworn frame, being an improved Man-Eater Bug + milling) I suggest Charge to search for Ryko and mill at the same time. Then, you can fish the Tuner of your choice out of the Graveyard with this, and voila.
8/10

[.Nu-13]

Mikhail, shut the f**k up. If YOU would look at Gust[size="7"][b]a[/b][/size]s you'd see that at least half of them benefit from being destroyed by battle, so they can fill the Graveyard easily. And why do you call her "terrible cardmaker"? Just because you won the Excess Brawl and you think that you're better than us?

OT: Card is perfectly fine. Adds some search power. It's also chainable to any destruction, which makes it better. Lst effect is fine too. And little advice for you - if you want to avoid retards like Mikhail, post in Written Cards

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Lol I'm gonna actually start doing that ^^.

And thanks Chill :3 for both comments lol ;P.

[.Nu-13]

Do that ^^

[♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥]

Will do ;P

[Mehmani]

[quote name='.Kowalski' timestamp='1295993679' post='4960448']
Mikhail, shut the f**k up. If YOU would look at Gust[size="7"][b]a[/b][/size]s you'd see that at least half of them benefit from being destroyed by battle, so they can fill the Graveyard easily. And why do you call her "terrible cardmaker"? Just because you won the Excess Brawl and you think that you're better than us?

OT: Card is perfectly fine. Adds some search power. It's also chainable to any destruction, which makes it better. Lst effect is fine too. And little advice for you - if you want to avoid retards like Mikhail, post in Written Cards
[/quote]

No, actually. It's because Written is a great place and Realistic is a terrible one. I hope that one day, people won't have to emigrate to Written to get accurate, good feedback. I hope that one day, Realistic will be a place with an output of consistent quality equivalent to that of Written. It's difficult, but I hope that one day it will be possible.

When I was a little younger, and more full of fire, I used to comment much in the way you do. I used to bash, to flame, to do things that made people react. I relished in it. I did things without thinking, without producing arguments, without using valid, unbiased evidence. In short, I used my opinions. I eventually realized that opinions will get you nowhere except out of this site. When I was threatened for expressing my opinions, I expressed them some more by negging the moderator that warned me. When I was banned for a month for doing so, I expressed my opinions by attacking a moderator via MSN and double accounting. When I came back, I expressed my anger through trolling. I got banned for a week again. Now I realized that if I am to gain any influence, to have any respect, I must learn to lose my opinions and keep quiet. I couldn't. So I returned to my "roots" - RC. I thought they loved opinions here, especially controversial, ground-breaking ones. But they don't. It turns out that I'm not the only relic of Written turning up around here. In Written, they react much the way those in TCG do when confronted with someone who disagrees with them or what is commonly accepted. They troll and flame quite badly. I've seen better trolling in lesser chans or even Youtube.

You know, as I write this monologue, I realize that I take things for granted here. I've become ingrained here, kind of like a piece of tissue in a ball of putty or a sailor in Pirates of the Caribbean. This site is far from a nice place, so why be nice. Thanks Klavier.

[byak]

[quote name='.Kowalski' timestamp='1295993679' post='4960448']
And why do you call her "terrible cardmaker"?
[/quote]

tbh this card is pretty useless.
The deck doesn't need a card like this, because the deck has like 9 recruiters that get what you want and can't necessarily be dead draws like this.

I've played pure Gusta before, and I'd rather keep my Gusta in the graveyard for something like Calm then recycle out a recruiter that's probably already in my hand (or something that gets that card is already in my hand).

Also, why not just go hurr durr Limiter Reverse instead? It puts recruiters on the field for their actual purpose (recruiting) and has cool combos with Gusta Squirrel.

[LiAM]

WTF IS THIS?


I MEAN SERIOUSLY?

WHAT'S A GUSTA?


Joking aside. Seems fair, no idea how Gusta's work but I can image it wont be overpowered if you made it ;D