RedRuler Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 I recently heard that the dates of the signs from the zodiac horoscope changed and that there is a new sign, is it true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Yes. But who cares, really? o: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice. Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 I heard it only effects you if you're 2009 or earlier. Either way I am much more of a Gemini then a Tauros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярополк Пономарёв Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Only if you were born in 2011 (that's probably half the forum). *shot* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Didn't care before, don't care now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang Xiao-Long Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 They added Ophiuchus to the Zodiac, saying it's one that the Ancient Civilizations left off on purpose. It's a stupid change really. The modern astrologers think I'm better suited as a Capricorn rather than an Aquarius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NobleShadow Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 I'm still Leo, even though I don't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 No. "Ophiuchus", is the 13th constellation... however, ideas for including him have been bounced around since in the 30s astronomers discovered that there really should be a period including him to be accurate. At any point in the last 80 years, it could have changed; some astrologers recently got fed up with the increasing gap between the actual constellations and what "constellation" you are born in. Adding Ophiuchus fixes this. There is no governing board of astrology, so whether you want to use the new system or not it entirely up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRuler Posted February 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Oh! I see, though i found the new dates of the signs and i'm still Pisces. NOTE: By the way, what is an Ophiuchus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 [quote name='HadesRuler' timestamp='1298299050' post='5023367'] NOTE: By the way, what is an Ophiuchus? [/quote] Snake holder. And this is even just ONE of the many horoscopes. If you don't like it, stick with the Chinese, Indian one or whatever you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumiа Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Yes, because a symbol depicting what date you were born in really matters and is thread worthy. Then again, I've seen far worse; so, no, not to my knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Link to the changes? ._. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Duelist Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 WTH I never heard about something like this! But anyways, I don't believe in horoscopes... How do stars have ANYTHING to do with what we're doing down here, dude the stars are like millions of miles away and all that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 The news of a "new Zodiac" thing have been hovering around since like, '07, but recently began spreading because a bunch of stupid people (IE: YCM) got a hold of it. http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/13/no-your-zodiac-sign-hasnt-changed/ tl;dr - Your Zodiac sign hasn't changed. If you had a kid right now, he would also follow the old Zodiac. There's no "lawl, born before '09 and he's safe!". Just ignorant people spreading more ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярополк Пономарёв Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1298311900' post='5023779'] The news of a "new Zodiac" thing have been hovering around since like, '07, but recently began spreading because a bunch of stupid people (IE: YCM) got a hold of it. [url="http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/13/no-your-zodiac-sign-hasnt-changed/"]http://news.blogs.cn...-hasnt-changed/[/url] [/quote] Yes YCM does weird things to sensitive data. [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1298311900' post='5023779'] tl;dr - Your Zodiac sign hasn't changed.[/quote] Good to know. [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1298311900' post='5023779'] If you had a kid right now, he would also follow the old Zodiac. [/quote] Good to know. [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1298311900' post='5023779'] There's no "lawl, born before '09 and he's safe!". Just ignorant people spreading more ignorance.[/quote] I wonder if I could take offense to that in anyway...nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan of the Sith Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Im happy with the change I used to be Sagitarius now im Ophiucus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaitou Kid Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 I choose to pay it no mind. Plus, if there really was a 13th sign, were all my previous horoscopes invalid? The description of a Virgo still fits me and so do its horoscopes, but as I look at it they all do fit me. It all a bunch of shenanigans in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 [quote name='Kaitou Kid' timestamp='1298383022' post='5026215'] I choose to pay it no mind. Plus, if there really was a 13th sign, were all my previous horoscopes invalid? The description of a Virgo still fits me and so do its horoscopes, but as I look at it they all do fit me. It all a bunch of shenanigans in my opinion. [/quote] There is no "Change". The 13-sign horoscope is just a different system that already existed, it doesn't "replace" anything any more than me being a Rooster in chinese astrology means that i'm "no longer" a Taurus in sidereal astrology. Your horoscope was already invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holly and the Ivy Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 I'm now an Aries. My old star sign didn't suit me at all but this is an even worse match. I am nothing like that.I don't believe it but people can form an opinion of you from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 [quote name='The Holly and the Ivy' timestamp='1298488022' post='5029289'] I'm now an Aries. My old star sign didn't suit me at all but this is an even worse match. I am nothing like that. I don't believe it but people can form an opinion of you from it. [/quote] I am Taurus on the old system and Aries on this system, both of them are complete garbage... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan of the Sith Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 OK is there anyone who likes this old yet new change...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.