Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 [quote name='ChilledFlames' timestamp='1298553163' post='5031237'] That's not what most women in my community are. It is actually more of a balance of weaknesses in Genders. If men are ignorant, then by that context, women must be crazy. If not, men would certainly understand women. [/quote] If we were able to classify women as crazy, then wouldn't men already understand women? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusion X. Denver Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 No, because sometimes people classify things they don't understand as crazy. Perfect example being the member Deustodo. Most people call him crazy because they never know what he's talking about. So men can call women crazy because they act out of their concept of "ordinary". However, men not understanding women and acting confused can also be called crazy by women, who understand each other perfectly, but may see men's confusion as crazy. It's all up to perspective really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 No stereotype is correct. Apperantly, according to most people, Men like sports because there simple.... I like reading books and playing video games, because they have plot and there fun, where as sports are, in my oppinion, stupid and pointless, as there is no real reason to why people are doing this, (besides fun of course, but I like plot) And women are constantly percieved as bitchy beings, who want everything, and need 20 of each of them. Where as one of my friends who is a girl is no where near the standared, she jokes around alot, barley ever complains, and likes some sports, as well as anime.On that note, while most people think men are dumb, and women are smart, I know of MANY women in my school who are MUCH dumber than I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 Women made you people. I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 Yes but (according to alot of religions) who made WOMEN! (Not starting a religious debate here, just making a point) God, and what sex was (according to alot of religions) god? Male. Let the sexist bashing on me begin, just please exclude religious bashing, we have to much of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 [quote name='Clair' timestamp='1299128272' post='5047617'] Women made you people. I hope. [/quote] But in the end, women were made by man. Or is was just Eve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 Edit: and for that matter, for you science and reason people, Women couldn't make people without Sperm in the first place. So without MEN, Women couldn't have children anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTW (For The Wynn) Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 So, in other words, what this is really getting down to is that it takes two to tango. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 [quote name='FTW (For The Wynn)' timestamp='1299128691' post='5047643'] So, in other words, what this is really getting down to is that it takes two to tango. [/quote] Yes. Thats precisely it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 Yep, thats the simplest way to put it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 The supposed general culture of women being intimidated, silenced, and ultimately domesticated by men is almost reversed up here. The most aggressive people I've known have been women. Ideas of every man ever throughout history having enslaved as many women as they could are gaining more and more prominence because of the examples set by victim-races like Jews and African Americans, and so men have started to compensate by living with more timidity. Because the same sort of male culture associated with the apparent abuse of women was responsible for a good deal of ruggedry in men, said ruggedry needs elimination too. Conversely, ruggedry is now encouraged in women. Men not feeling bad about the ways women have been treated throughout history are a dying breed, as they should be. However, there's a progression. First, it's been stressed how rape's unacceptable, as it should be. Then, objectification of women's unacceptable, as it should be. Next, the most mainstream artists today are symbols of womanly domination like Gaga and of male sensitivity like Bieber. Then we've got kids raised to be Gagas and Biebers and objectification and ridicule of man's widespread until the next Masculin uprising. I don't mean to be mysoginistic, I'm just saying that women and men have to moderate their dominations over eachother. It's a sketchy balance, and there'll always be resentment between sexes in their fights for freedoms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 women have no equation period. you cant predict them with studies or experience, just like you cant predict men. im a dude and sometimes i dont understand some dude logics like all men have masturbated once in their life. just a myth, some badasses dont need to masterbate cuz they have sex 24/7, some dont masterbate because they think its immoral or unpure just as many women could be masturbating as much as men there's really no difference except for anatomy wise except for maybe one society place rule men can get away with more dirt than women, according to social scientist women having alot of sex with other dudes = whore (the oldest profession and placed on society since the beginning of time) men having lots of sex with other women = legend (because it was accepted for males to be dominant since the beginning of time) and it still continues today, most likely never changing no amount of civil rights movements change this implemented law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masochistic Joker Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 You can live without them because Bill Gates does and it is quite obvious why. In prison you can because a guy's ass is just as good as a woman. However women are needed for procreation so we they are required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 >got along with a lot of women and really understood them >95% of those women turned out to be men >4% of the remaining people are transgenders >realize I still don't understand women >god dammit [quote name='Masochistic Joker' timestamp='1299169826' post='5048220'] You can live without them because Bill Gates does and it is quite obvious why. In prison you can because a guy's ass is just as good as a woman. However women are needed for procreation so we they are required. [/quote] ...isn't Bill Gates married with kids? Either way, all people have the need to be loved whether it be by women, men, or family. There's just no escaping that no matter -what- you tell yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 4, 2011 Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 [quote name='Wahrheit' timestamp='1298393086' post='5026476'] I find it interesting, however, that women always fantasize about Mr. Perfect and yet they would rather date the jerk than the man who stands in front of them, waiting for them to realize he's exactly who they want. [/quote] This is stupid. Women date "the jerk" because he demonstrates higher value. "Women don’t think in terms of honor, women don’t say “word is bond;” women are basically emotionally driven. If they feel it, they do it, period. Then they rationalize it to themselves later. Nothing is more meaningful, or compelling, to a woman than (1) the way she feels and (2) learning more about her own inner self and having emotional realizations. That’s why women love astrology, chick flicks, soap operas, stupid Cosmo quizes that supposedly reveal info about yourself, etc." Also: "You might say, “But…but…I’m so nice! I’m a nice guy!” Guess what? That’s like a fat chick saying, “But I’m so smart!” As if those things have anything in the world to do with sexual attraction!" Taken from a professional PUA's article. Will link over PM if you want, but its NSFW(strong language). [quote name='Wahrheit' timestamp='1298394421' post='5026512'] That's not stereotyping, that's your average American high school experience. Try asking a girl about her boyfriend. She'll go on about how great he is... but if you pick at it enough you'll see what I mean. Girls are more concerned with status than relationships in high school unfortunately, but there are the rare jewels who are just a little bit more mature than that. [/quote] Both girls are mature. However, the girl who is "more concerned with status than relationships in high school" is actually smarter. Relationships in high school are about as useful as a broken pencil. No point. Having a boyfriend or girlfriend in general is just about status anyway. [quote name='Byakuya Kuchiki' timestamp='1298415058' post='5027417'] Women were solely created to have sex with males and reproduce and grow. But on the questions, it depends on the woman who you are talking too. I think you're referring to the stereotypical women who act like whores. [/quote] No women acts like a whore. Taken again from a professional PUA "Chicks act at all times to gain and maintain social status. This is more important to them than getting laid." [quote name='ADHD-Guitar' timestamp='1298416582' post='5027498'] Women can be equally as foolish as men. They crave possessions slightly more than men, are usually more self-conscious, and generally don't apply logic to situations. Men on the other hand, are stupid in a completely different way, but I trust that the rest of you have already covered that. [/quote] Proof or GTFO. [quote name='Revolver Amethyst' timestamp='1298436745' post='5028234'] This thread is full of ignorant bigots. [/quote] Wow, I actually agree with you. Ohshi.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wahrheit Posted March 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 I seem to be pulling everyone out from under the bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='Mikhail Tal' timestamp='1298411059' post='5027155'] Men (apart from us gays) are ridiculously easy to manipulate. [/quote] No. Sex is lame. Intelligence for the win.(I'm not gay.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smear Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='Legend Zero' timestamp='1298415161' post='5027426'] Justin Beiber and/or Twilight....you're argument is invalid. [/quote] If Justin Beiber showed a woman his penis in public, they'd just laugh. @Above: SO YOU'D RATHER SIT AT HOME DOING MATH OR SOMETHING THAN HAVE SEX? ARE YOU HIGH? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunt Issun Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 He didn't say that, just because someone wants to be smart, doesn't mean they like math. He was saying, its better to be smart, and intelegent, then stupid, and laid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smear Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 [quote name='Wang Fire' timestamp='1299388895' post='5054515'] He didn't say that, just because someone wants to be smart, doesn't mean they like math. He was saying, its better to be smart, and intelegent, then stupid, and laid. [/quote] Actually, he said sex is lame. And intelligence ftw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='Smeargle' timestamp='1299385942' post='5054389'] If Justin Beiber showed a woman his penis in public, they'd just laugh. @Above: SO YOU'D RATHER SIT AT HOME DOING MATH OR SOMETHING THAN HAVE SEX? ARE YOU HIGH? [/quote] No. I have more important things to do than get laid. And these 'Important things' Might take years. Look@ My Siggy. "Anti-Social Calculative Mature Confident Unconcerned Factual Unexplainable" Ironicially, I [b]Am[/b] the majority of those things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299462761' post='5056894'] No. I have more important things to do than get laid. [/quote] Proof or GTFO I'm thinking that because you won't have any, you might as well bedunkadunk after GingTFO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [i]Sex is lame. Intelligence for the win.[/i] If you really were intelligent, you'd realize that sex is a means for reproduction in humans, so if you want your [i]supposedly[/i] "smart" genes to pass on and exist for generations and generations, you need to have sex. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that I'd start failing all of my classes being some seductive girl offered to give me an oral (does half of YCM even know what that is), but calling sex "lame" is an extreme overstatement and shows how little you thought about the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Dark' timestamp='1299550821' post='5059294'] [i]Sex is lame. Intelligence for the win.[/i] If you really were intelligent, you'd realize that sex is a means for reproduction in humans, so if you want your [i]supposedly[/i] "smart" genes to pass on and exist for generations and generations, you need to have sex. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that I'd start failing all of my classes being some seductive girl offered to give me an oral (does half of YCM even know what that is), but calling sex "lame" is an extreme overstatement and shows how little you thought about the issue. [/quote] Why does sex matter at all? What is the purpose of ensuring the human race's existence? You assume that A) Sex is important and that Ensuring the human race's existence is important, but you do this a priori and in an unconvincing manner. As someone who's thought about the issue, I will claim that sex isn't important at all. Why? Because it isn't special. It is just isn't worth the rush of endorphins and what not. I'd rather do the downtown lester brown, if you catch my drift. Plus, every man has to pay for sex(legal sex). Not money necessarily, but you have to deal with women, and the lack of personality over 9000% of them have. I'd rather put my manhood in a blender and turn it on than have to sit through a dinner with a girl, and her talk about how "omg becki is such a huge **** and she is trying to get me fired" or something of that nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Ish international women day today.:'3 Eh...I firmly believe that "the modern woman" (even though there's nothing like that but you catch my drift) should be neither submissive nor a victim of "the system". Not a whore unless that's really your job and not under the feet of a man either. I believe that the modern woman should be able to care for herself, not in the style of feminists who cry about not enough women being the head of a big corporation (now who wants to be the head of a big corp? there's an essay about feminism being a kind of capitalism in disguise, really interesting and maybe I'll post it), but being able to cook for yourself, possibly being able to sew your own clothes, or being able to deal with your car and whatnot. Same salary for the same effort as well. But that's just my ideal, what I personally strive to be like. I agree there's a difference in the way of thinking, at least for many women compared to many men, and we're possibly a bit more appearance-centered. But what I don't like are the traditional ideals of what's typically masculine and typically feminine and the 2 should better not mix.D: Sure, car racing is considered manstuff and few women like that, but what if a woman is both into knitting and car racing? And for clothing, if I wear some flowery stuff I get the "oh so feminine baww :3" but some things I consider neutral...will always be considered masculine, no matter how much Marlene Dietrich popularized them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.