Jump to content

Locals report: Infernities


Recommended Posts

Ok I would understand if the ruling were that you could only search 1, but still, as I say, for starters, nobody who was watching questioned it and secondly, I would've won anyway. Also I know for a fact that Gold Sarco doesn't suck in here. I am not listening to any of Loki's reasoning any more, even if he is Kyosuke Kiryu.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Loki el Señor de los Aesir' timestamp='1299533758' post='5058677']
But it's too slow... :|
[/quote]

Yes. If slow means losing slowly and painfully because you can't draw into the last component you need to start OTKing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If you have one or more cards in your hand when resolving the effect of "Infernity Archfiend", then you cannot add an "Infernity" card from your Deck to your hand"

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Infernity_Archfiend


gg sir

don't try and out do me on rulings on infernities, i wrote the motherfucking guide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on if their chains are simultaneous or not. I don't know enough about the rules to know if there is such a thing as a "Simultaneous chain". But there might not be. If they are simultaneous chains then the cards are added at the same time, both seeing you having 0 cards in hand at the time they resolve. Otherwise, you are right.

EDIT: Looked up simultaneous effect, and it says that they form a chain, so you are right. It was EXTREMELY close to being able to work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Loki el Señor de los Aesir' timestamp='1299533758' post='5058677']
But it's too slow... :|
[/quote]

The point is that Infernities are still inconsistent in terms of pulling off the OTK quickly (it normally varies from the second to the sixth or seventh turn if they are really unlucky), and they aren't capable of performing some kind of stalling method for seven turns then that can cripple them. Waiting two turns is better than waiting more than two turns, comprendo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mikhail Tal' timestamp='1299536550' post='5058812']
The point is that Infernities are still inconsistent in terms of pulling off the OTK quickly (it normally varies from the second to the sixth or seventh turn if they are really unlucky), and they aren't capable of performing some kind of stalling method for seven turns then that can cripple them. Waiting two turns is better than waiting more than two turns, comprendo?
[/quote]
http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/224524-achieving-the-handless-combo-infernity-guide-discussion/

I know how the deck works and probably know more about it than anyone else on the forum, just saying. I've tested the deck 1000s of times. And I'm just saying, if you have the right build, gold sarc is far too slow.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, Congrats on your duel even though your second. Atleast you used a build that worked well for you.

second, i thought there was 0 cursing tolerated... Atleast it was a year ago.

third, G-zom, your locals seem to have a nice mix of deck types. I think it gives everyone a fair game experience when people are using different decks. I don't know much on Infernities because I stayed away from them for reasons of I never pulled many and I don't like being handless alot and you usually need to have no hand for their effects to work. I also tend to drift more towards lesser used decktypes.

On topic: you gonna use this deck again in the future? or are you gonna wait til it's complete and fine-tuned?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Loki el Señor de los Aesir' timestamp='1299452177' post='5056452']
Also sarc is horrible.
[/quote]

[s]This said the guy who runs [b]2[/b] Gold Sarc in LS.[/s]

Anyway, it seems like you did pretty well! Really a shame that you had to play against a GK deck in the Top 2 match!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. Gold Sarc is staying. Allure is going. One for One is staying because it helps a lot more than it hinders. If i don't need it I just use it as discard fodder for Inferno.

[Quote]
Firstly, Congrats on your duel even though your second. Atleast you used a build that worked well for you.

second, i thought there was 0 cursing tolerated... Atleast it was a year ago.

third, G-zom, your locals seem to have a nice mix of deck types. I think it gives everyone a fair game experience when people are using different decks. I don't know much on Infernities because I stayed away from them for reasons of I never pulled many and I don't like being handless alot and you usually need to have no hand for their effects to work. I also tend to drift more towards lesser used decktypes.

On topic: you gonna use this deck again in the future? or are you gonna wait til it's complete and fine-tuned?
[/Quote]

Thanks dude. Yeah, cursing WAS 0 tolerated, until the entire forum got trolled like hell and the mods couldn't do anything about it. They are now cowering in the corner, apart from Sephiroth. My locals are quite good, with good players using a wide variety of deck types, meta and non-meta. If you are running Infernities, you would have to change your attitude so that you do like to have an empty hand, or the deck will be dead. Yes, I am definitely using this in the future. It is now my first/main deck, along with Frognarchs and not-yet-complete FishOTK (need Armory Arms).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...