Mad Hopz Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 OK. OK. Now I am sure that many people will disagree with my opinion. However, it is my opinion and that is not likely going to change unless I am persuaded by extreme measures (holding me at gun point). Now, I am pretty sure that those who will read this thread actually know what TNA and WWE are. They are pro wrestling brands. Now, I just want everyone to know that WWE is heading in the wrong direction. Has anyone noticed a change in WWE? I have. It sucks now. I recently watched the Royal Rumble PPV, and I have to say that it sucked. Wait! What? You guys are all probably thinking wasn't the Royal Rumble one of the Big Four? One of the top PPV's along with Summerslam, Wrestlemania and Survivor Series? Well, I'd have to say that the PPV was average. No better than your normal SmackDown! or RAW Show. No good at all. Now, the new hype, TNA. Of course, TNA doesn't have a big as name as WWE but it is quickly rising and I believe that one day TNA will surpass WWE. No, I guaren-damn-tee it. The 6-sided ring makes the matches much more fresh and allows for more creativity on the part of the wrestlers. Also, since TNA doesn't have that many house shows, the matches are new and fresh for the viewers. Now, TNA doesn't have faces that only know about 7 moves (*cough cough* John Cena *cough*). The X-Division is magnificent. And I have never seen more jaw-dropping finishers than the Clash of Styles or the Canadian Destroyer! Discuss. I hope this is in the right section. This was very well thought-out, your responses better be as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerfan Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 TNA SUCKS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Hopz Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 TNA SUCKS!Ok. That's your opinion. Like I said, in my opinion, TNA is way better than WWE. And what happened to well thought-out responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 oh course tna is better and all the people that havent seen tna or the ppv is awsome they have matches better than wwe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Hopz Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 finally, some one who agrees! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zachy_syko Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 ehh...i like wwe and i cant really comment on tna cause ive never seen a match cause the stupid tv networks in australia show the tna ppvs but not the weekly shows! idk why but they do. anyway the wwf (note the f) was the best regardless of what tna is and eva will be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Hopz Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 that i agree with. back in the WWF, the storylines were actually good and the superstars had good gimmicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 TNA bad actors, fail at drama, everyting is black and red (don't ask) the only person i like on TNA would be Tomko (w/e his name is) TNA = epic fail WWE used to be good but is now stupid (the hornswaggle crap, he is like 30, cause he is a dwarf meens he is a kid?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(!Death!Reborn!) Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 what he hell is TNA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zachy_syko Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 TNA is total nonstop action, a rival company to world wrestling entertainment. well, almost rival to the wwe...some say theres been no REAL rival since WCW and even though ive never watched tna i do believe they are no threat to the wwe as they are now. the future, however, could be very different...very different indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 i saw both, ok TNA's six poles ring is cool but it's way too hardcore. we want to see talent not killing or we would make a time machine and watch gladiators. WWE has everything you need and it has the funds to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barsam Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 WWE Rules! 3 Reasons 1.Wwe Has way stronger People as In Undertaker,Kane,Batista,Mark Henry,Big Daddy V,Chuck Palumbo 2.Tna I dont now who is in it but Booker t and Lesner 3. Wwe has High Defension now. Tna well never surpass Wwe. It will never will.There to afraid to admit it. As when Booker T Made his 1st day at Tna. All people there said WWE Sucks or stuff like that but it will never surpass Wwe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 WWE Rules! 3 Reasons 1.Wwe Has way stronger People as In Undertaker' date='Kane,Batista,Mark Henry,Big Daddy V,Chuck Palumbo 2.Tna I dont now who is in it but Booker t and Lesner 3. Wwe has High Defension now. Tna well never surpass Wwe. It will never will.There to afraid to admit it. As when Booker T Made his 1st day at Tna. All people there said WWE Sucks or stuff like that but it will never surpass Wwe.[/quote'] there is Kurt Angle. and they have many good wrestlers and it may surpass WWE but not for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Dude Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 I dont like wresiling but TNA's better because WWE is fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zachy_syko Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 stronger doesnt mean better remember. big daddy v, mark henry etc are strong but cant wrestle for peanuts! they have to be either high flying luchadore style or a great wrestler technically (im talkin wide field, from hhh to angle to lesnar) to be able to be great "wrasslers" in my opinion. thats why wwe lost appeal, cause ppl like cena and orton have come in and ruined it! i still cant comment on tna, but aj styles is pretty cool from what little i have seen of him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megamaster125 Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 I've tried watching TNA a few times, I just couldn't get into it. The 6sided ring seems to do more harm than good, imo. There're corners everywhere, so they can't do much in terms of building momentum from running back and forth accross the ring. Also, what's with all the John Cena hate? You could take practically any wrestler and say they all do the same moves. Let's take Shawn Michaels for example: 1. Flying forearm2. Jump up3. Inverted atomic drop4. 1-2 right hand knockdowns5. Scoop slam6. Flying elbow from the top rope7. Tune up the band for sweet chin music Btw, I'm not saying this is a bad thing. I like the fact the wrestlers have their signature moves. It's people like Mr. Kennedy and MVP that I find boring to watch. All they do is punch, kick, and apply a couple basic submissions like headlocks, and then they have their 1-2 signature moves. Oh, and they can throw people into the ring post/steel steps, if that counts for anything. >.< What I really like about the WWE is seeing athletic new moves all the time, especially on ECW. John Morrison and C.M. Punk are my favorites on there, and every match thoes 2 have had against each other has been and epic contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basherbelding Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 My opinion is that WWE is better But that is because i dont know anything about TNA ive neaver seen a TNA match in my life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 I dont like wresiling but TNA's better because WWE is fake TNA is fake aswell buddy....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserGlider Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 I haven't really watched TNA that much, but They certainly have better wrestling. WWE has gotten extremely stale and boring the last few years.every now and then, they pull of something cool and unexpected(Cena's return at the Rumble, Jericho's return, Jeff Hardy's Wisper in the Wind off the top of the cage) but the product has gotten very predictable. Too many supertars quit (Angle, Booker, Lesnar, RVD, Rock) and I don't see any stars being the "future of the business" besides Cena and Batista, who I AM TIRED OF BEEING IN THE MAIN EVENT OF EVERY SINGLE PPV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Hopz Posted February 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 I haven't really watched TNA that much' date=' but They certainly have better wrestling. WWE has gotten extremely stale and boring the last few years.every now and then, they pull of something cool and unexpected(Cena's return at the Rumble, Jericho's return, Jeff Hardy's Wisper in the Wind off the top of the cage) but the product has gotten very predictable. Too many supertars quit (Angle, Booker, Lesnar, RVD, Rock) and I don't see any stars being the "future of the business" besides Cena and Batista, who I AM TIRED OF BEEING IN THE MAIN EVENT OF EVERY SINGLE PPV.[/quote']thank you! the only reason that wwe is more popular is that they have more of a name than TNA. tna just isn't as widely known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I don't exactly get to watch wrestling on TV. However TNA has already surpassed the WWE, TNA is literally stealing all of the WWE's talent... *COUGH*Booker T*COUGH* and allowing them to give their full potential. And when you have Traci Brooks well...how can I not like TNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I think WWE is better, TNA just isn't that good. I dont like wresiling but TNA's better because WWE is fake They're both fake... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon Master Posted February 15, 2008 Report Share Posted February 15, 2008 TNA PWNS WWE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.