Jump to content

No. 64 Mech Peircer


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Invalid Arguement' timestamp='1305851050' post='5219667']
[size="4"][font="Century Gothic"][i][b]"Exceed Network Open! Delta Limit Break, Boosted! Network Max Range Updated! Overlay 1, Ok! Overlay 2, Ok! Stars Scattered Across The Overlay Network! Unite to stop Evil Machinery from destroying the world! Booster Limit Rank 4! Open! Exceed Summon! Peirce The Metal Of Evil! Number Six Hundred Sixty Four Mech Peircer!"[/b][/i][/font][/size]
[/quote]

[center][img]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i465/DeathlyFiend/No64-2.png?t=1305857168[/img][/center]
[center][spoiler=Lore][i]2 or more Level 4 Fiend-Type monsters
Once per turn, you can remove 1 Exceed Material Monster from this card to activate 1 of the following effects.
• Destroy 1 card on the field.
• Negate the activation of a Spell or Trap Card.
• Randomly discard 1 card from your opponent's hand.[/i][/spoiler][/center]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[size="4"][font="Century Gothic"][i][b]"Exceed Network Open! Delta Limit Break, Boosted! Network Max Range Updated! Overlay 1, Ok! Overlay 2, Ok! Stars Scattered Across The Overlay Network! Unite to stop Evil Machinery from destroying the world! Booster Limit Rank 4! Open! Exceed Summon! Peirce The Metal Of Evil! Number Sixty Four Mech Peircer!"[/b][/i][/font][/size]


OT: Would be better if It where Generic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, technically, you really should avoid making any Exceeds that range from No.1 to No.99. Otherwise, Konami will release a card of the same number, and that will conflict. Also, it has been decided in the TCG that they will actually use the term "Number", NOT the abbreviation "No.". Source: http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110518121134/yugioh/images/a/a0/YSD6-DeckEN.gif

The card itself is alright and it could be quite useful (especially the first two effects) - but just curious, why didn't you use Touma's Exceed Template?

Anyways, for an OCG fix:
2 or more Level 4 Fiend-Type monsters
[b]Once per turn,[/b] you can remove 1 Exceed Material Monster from this card to [b]activate[/b] 1 of the following effects.
• Des[b]tro[/b]y 1 card on the field.
• Negate the activation of [b]a[/b] Spell or Trap Card.
• Randomly [b]discard[/b] 1 card from your opponent's hand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Zextra' timestamp='1305854964' post='5219795']
Well, technically, you really should[b] avoid making any Exceeds that range from No.1 to No.99.[/b] Otherwise, Konami will release a card of the same number, and that will conflict. Also, it has been decided in the [b]TCG that they will actually use the term "Number", NOT the abbreviation "No."[/b]. Source: http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110518121134/yugioh/images/a/a0/YSD6-DeckEN.gif

The card itself is alright and it could be quite useful (especially the first two effects) - [b]but just curious, why didn't you use Touma's Exceed Template?[/b]

Anyways, for an OCG fix:
2 or more Level 4 Fiend-Type monsters
Once per turn, you can remove 1 Exceed Material Monster from this card to activate 1 of the following effects.
• Destroy 1 card on the field.
• Negate the activation of a Spell or Trap Card.
• Randomly discard 1 card from your opponent's hand.
[/quote]
1. I know I should avoid it, but 64 is a lucky number of mine and this was my first exceed, so I thought I could make it lucky.
2. Hate that, so I have no follows to it. And with OCG, I can still use the abbreviation.
3. I wanted to try this out. And I use Baraka's Exceed if I need to, not Touma's, the stars aren't at HQ.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News flash, [s]Exceed[/s] ---> Xyz

But the guy is rather good. So simple, yet so good. Although to be honest, he looks like didn't have much thought into. More like you wanted to test LiAM's Xyz Template. =D

For playability, and restriction to [s]Dark Worlds[/s] Fiends, I'd say he wins an 8.5/10.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1306076314' post='5224982']
News flash, [s]Exceed[/s] ---> Xyz

But the guy is rather good. So simple, yet so good. Although to be honest, he looks like didn't have much thought into. More like you wanted to test LiAM's Xyz Template. =D

For playability, and restriction to [s]Dark Worlds[/s] Fiends, I'd say he wins an 8.5/10.
[/quote]
HATE THAT NAME SO MUCH. I knew about it, but I will NEVER use it on my cards.
I usually make good cards on the spot, so I really do not put thought into it, but I thought it would be useful on the field.
I have 3 other template as my disposal, I do rather like his though.
Thank you for the rating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...