Classic Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 [color="#000000"][center][font="Century Gothic"][b]Just another single ^^ [img]http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/9946/131224y.jpg[/img] [u]Effect[/u]: This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card can only be Normal Summoned by banishing 3 Warrior-Type Monsters on your side of the field (you cannot Set this card).9 You take no Battle Damage from battles involving this card. Once per turn, you can banish 1 Warrior-Type Monster in your Graveyard to destroy 1 Monster on your Opponent's side of the field and inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed Monster's level x300. This card gains 600 ATK for every banished card. When this card is destroyed, destroy all Spell & Trap cards on your Opponent's side of the field.[/b][/font][/center][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelds9 Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Good card. I'm not sure if this card is OP and balanced. I have a hard time deciding, but I'm leaning towards balanced. Normally I would say make it so that you gain 600 for each of YOUR Banished cards, but normally Warriors don't Banish... Nice pic and especially nice name. It balances it out because it doesn't Banish your opponent's monster, it destroys it. Good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 [color="#000000"][font="Century Gothic"][center][b]Thanks for Feedback ^^![/b][/center][/font][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelds9 Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 NP. Also, congrats on almost 2000 posts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 [color="#000000"][font="Century Gothic"][center][b]Thanks, but considering i was 5 months away from joining in 08' i should have tones more xD. *Edit*' Rofl 2000th Post. [/b][/center][/font][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Last effect seems a bit unnecessary. Obviously this would be really fun to work with Survivor. Wish it wasn't once per turn though. Then again, more then one would make it to powerful possibly. Grah (screams in frustration) Well at least I can say it's a good card. 8.45634/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 [center][color="#000000"][font="Century Gothic"][b]Unnescesary but useful! xD. Anyways thanks for feedback and rate! [/b][/font][/color][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirtyStan Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Alright. It looks like a good card. I like it. Some minute OCG and organization fixes though. In organization, you should: - List any effects/condition involving the card's activation/Summoning (Ex. This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set, this card cannot be Special Summoned except..., etc.) - List any general abilities (Ex. This card cannot be destroyed by battle, this card cannot be targeted by effects, etc.) - List additional effects (Ex. Once per turn you may..., Each time a Spell Card is activated..., etc.) - List any effects when the card is removed from the field (Ex. When this card is sent from the field to the Graveyard..., If this card is destroyed..., etc.) Also, the word Banish is capitalized because it is an area of the field, like the Graveyard and the Deck. However, opponent is NOT capitalized. This card cannot be Special Summoned or Set. This card can only be Normal Summoned by Banishing 3 Warrior-Type Monsters on your side of the field. This card gains 600 ATK for every Banished card. You take no Battle Damage from battles involving this card. Once per turn, you may Banish 1 Warrior-Type Monster in your Graveyard to destroy 1 Monster on your opponent's side of the field and inflict damage to your opponent equal to the destroyed Monster's level x300. When this card is destroyed, destroy all Spell & Trap cards on your opponent's side of the field. Anyways, I like the card overall. 9.2/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nghtwing Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 Very good card! , I couldn't know well if it is a little bit OP'd or balanced... BUT i stay with balanced 9/10 *-* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 5, 2011 Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 600 per banished card on either side should be fine it's going to need at least 5 to hold reasonably, though maybe you should consider an atk limit it can have 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2011 [font="Century Gothic"][color="#000000"][center][b]@ Sirty Are you sure banish is capitalized, it's not in the OCG thread o.o. Anyways thanks for feedback and extensive review ^^. @ Matheus Thanks for Rate, glad you like it ^^. @ Ragnarok Thanks for feedback ^^'[/b][/center][/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2011 [font="Century Gothic"][color="#000000"][center][b]Oh say can you bump.[/b][/center][/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 [quote name='Classic' timestamp='1307275776' post='5256500'] [font="Century Gothic"][color="#000000"][center][b]@ Sirty Are you sure banish is capitalized, it's not in the OCG thread o.o. Anyways thanks for feedback and extensive review ^^. @ Matheus Thanks for Rate, glad you like it ^^. @ Ragnarok Thanks for feedback ^^'[/b][/center][/color][/font] [/quote] Remove from play wasn't capitalized = Banish is not either. Good card. I know of 2 Decks that remove their Warriors: -D.D. monsters (Warrior, Assailant, Warrior Lady, Survivor) -Elemental HERO monsters (because of Miracle Fusion and Fusion Gate) Although I'd rather run some non-self-banishing Warriors to bring this out as this card's effect needs Graveyard. Card is balanced and I couldn't spot OCG errors either~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatMachine Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 I'm a bit confused on the part saying "This card cannot be Special Summoned or Set. This can only be Normal Summoned by..." It needs an OCG fix: "This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card can only be Normal Summoned by banishing 3 Warrior-Type Monsters on your side of the field (you cannot set this card). " Otherwise: Good balance and effectiveness 9/10, but with OCG fix: 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 7, 2011 Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 [quote name='TheGreatMachine' timestamp='1307481357' post='5264560'] I'm a bit confused on the part saying "This card cannot be Special Summoned or Set. This can only be Normal Summoned by..." It needs an OCG fix: "This card cannot be Special Summoned. [b]You must Tribute 3 Warrior-Type monsters to Normal Summon this card (you cannot Set this card).[/b]" Otherwise: Good balance and effectiveness 9/10, but with OCG fix: 9.5/10 [/quote] hmm that's true (didn't notice it.) That wording is easily mixed with a semi-nomi lore. Bolded legal-Obelisk-like correction from the correction. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Obelisk_the_Tormentor [b]S[/b]et is capitalized. If its a Normal Summon monster I think its rather underpowered then ^^" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2011 [color="#000000"]][font="Century Gothic"][center][b]@ The Great Machine Was thinking about that, never thought it was put in the text though... Thanks for feedback & Rate ^^. @ Sleepy Thanks for feedback and, confirming Machine's suggestion ^^... But ... I did capitalize set o.o[/b][/center][/font][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 If it is not 3 Warrior for Normal Summoning, it is would be broken then. Your card is now fine, but last effect seems unnecessary. Change it to all cards on the field for more balancing Opponent=opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 [center][quote name='Maha Guns' timestamp='1307491237' post='5265328'] If it is not 3 Warrior for Normal Summoning, it is would be broken then. Your card is now fine, but last effect seems unnecessary. Change it to all cards on the field for more balancing Opponent=opponent. [/quote] [font="Comic Sans MS"][color="#8B0000"][b]Exactly why 3 Warrior for summoning is their. Last effect could be considered unnecessary, but its useful and it fits the name x]... :L. Feedback Appreciated though ^^. [/b][/color][/font][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 [quote name='Classic' timestamp='1307488514' post='5265087'] [color="#000000"]][font="Century Gothic"][center][b]@ The Great Machine Was thinking about that, never thought it was put in the text though... Thanks for feedback & Rate ^^. @ Sleepy Thanks for feedback and, confirming Machine's suggestion ^^... But ... I did capitalize set o.o[/b][/center][/font][/color] [/quote] The non-capitalized "Set". I was referring to the post above me for that one ^-^" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 [center][color="#808000"][font="Century Gothic"][b]@ Sleepy Oh haha, k. (AKA a bump)[/b][/font][/color][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-Psi Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 Dang, its hard to decide if this card is too strong or just right. I do think the last effect is not needed because its earlier effect takes care of that. 8.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 [font="Century Gothic"][color="#8B0000"][center][b]Thanks for feedback ^^. [/b][/center][/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.