Shadow Ninja Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 Edited: THERE! I think this is better. Opinions ? [img]http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/871/146730.jpg[/img] [spoiler=Lore]When Summoned: Target 1 face-down Defense Position monster your opponent controls; Destroy it. Then, this card gains its ATK/DEF. Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this effect. Once per turn: You can switch this card's ATK and DEF. While this card's ATK/DEF are less than or equal to 1000: Target 1 monster your opponent controls; It is returned to their hand. This card gains 200 ATK/DEF for each Level of the targeted monster. While this card's ATK/DEF are greater than 1000 but less than 2000: Target 1 monster you control; It is returned to your hand. This card gains 100 ATK/DEF for each Level of the targeted monster. [/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veniet Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Wow,this isn't really bad at all. I only wonder if there's a limit to any number of effects a card can have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Little OPed, remove this parts "This card gains ATK and DEF equal to the selected monster." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascriptmaster Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 [quote]When this card is Summoned: Select 1 face-down Defense Position monster your opponent controls; destroy that target, then this card gains ATK and DEF equal to the destroyed monster's ATK and DEF. Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this effect. You can banish one monster you control; this card gains ATK and DEF equal to the banished monster's Level x200 and its Level is increased by 2. Once per turn: You can switch the ATK and DEF of this monster.[/quote] Interesting effect, and pretty balanced too. Without using Book of Moon, its first effect can't really be abused. Its second effect seems like one that needs to be once per turn to stay balanced (swarming abuse), but I don't understand why its Level has to increase. Third effect is pretty much completely pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 The pic looks great. OCG is good. Seems a little OP'd to me but not much. The effect is good otherwise. I like it overall. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndlessOcean Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Can it pass Level 12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Ninja Posted June 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Thanks guys. Thought it was a little Op'd myself. I'll fix that. [quote name='jushirouki' timestamp='1308471741' post='5294715'] Interesting effect, and pretty balanced too. Without using Book of Moon, its first effect can't really be abused. Its second effect seems like one that needs to be once per turn to stay balanced (swarming abuse), but I don't understand why its Level has to increase. Third effect is pretty much completely pointless. [/quote] Thanks for the OCG, but 1. You don't need Book of Moon. Your opponent doesn't always summon monsters....they set some as well, whether its for defence, effect, etc. 2. Your ATK is not always higher than your DEF, and I like the idea of switching them to suit...well the duel, the condition they're placed under or if it works best for your strategy. [quote name='Insanious' timestamp='1308482285' post='5294801'] Can it pass Level 12? [/quote] Why would you think that? That effect can only be used once per summon. It goes up to eight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nghtwing Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 Style: The Name and the Attribute matches perfectly with the pic, but the pic itself doesn't look very good :/ OCG: The OCG is good, I think, I don't know too much about these things ;P Balance: It's a little bit OP'd, and why are you Increasing its Level? anyway 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Ninja Posted June 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 @Matheus Mariano II: The pic is just fine...thanks for the rating though. [b]CARD EDITED[/b] See 1st post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 20, 2011 Report Share Posted June 20, 2011 When this card is Summoned: Select and destroy 1 face-down Defen[b]s[/b]e Position monster your opponent controls. This card gains ATK and DEF equal to the destroyed monster. Negate the effects of Effect [b]M[/b]onsters destroyed by this effect. •If this card’s ATK and DEF [b]are[/b] less than 1000: You can banish 1 monster you control to increase this card's ATK and DEF by the banished monster's Level x 200. If this card's ATK and DEF [b]are[/b] less than or equal to 1000 after this effect has be activated, this effect can be used once more. •If this card’s ATK and DEF [b]are[/b] less than 2000 but greater than or equal to 1000: You can banish 1 monster you control to increase this card's ATK and DEF by the banished monster's Level x 100. Once per turn, you can switch the ATK and DEF of this card. [color=blue] •Your last effect should go before the dot effects. I know you left a line to show that its separate, but by placing it there is what made the writing in your card look so small and I think it would fit better above those anyways. •"Select" is not used anymore. The correct word is "target" now. Also, targeting goes in the same place as the costs (before the actual effect.) In other words, before the semi-colon. You put the colon right but you still need another step further. •Lastly before the actual correction, I'd say this last one is more optional but: You don't really need to go into another line for every big dot. I know some cards have it like that but it wastes a lot of space and makes the actual card harder to read. Also, the big dots are enough to see the division between each effect. ^the above correction is only covering 2 grammar errors and nothing more. I'll rewrite the effect now: [/color] [quote=Effect] When Summoned: Target 1 face-down Defense Position monster your opponent controls; Destroy it. Then, gain its ATK/DEF and negate that monster's effects. Once per turn: You can switch this card's ATK and DEF. While this card's ATK/DEF are less than 1000: You can banish 1 monster you control; This card gains 200 ATK/DEF for each Level of the banished monster. While this card's ATK/DEF are equal or greater than 1000 but less than 2000: You can banish 1 monster you control; This card gains 100 ATK/DEF for each Level of the banished monster. [/quote] [color=blue] As you can see, neither the big dots nor the spaces were needed. To leave or take that OCG fix is up to you, the important message is: [i]Conditions: Cost/Targeting; Effect/Resolution.[/i] or [i]Cost: Effect/Resolution.[/i] Anyways, enough OCG. Your card is interesting. I think its ATK/DEF expectations are too low to that effect. Seems like the card is expected to have never more than 2000, which is low for a Level 5. The banishing cost is a little to costy too, but its a combination of both what makes this a little underpowered. I like how it destroys a monster but its very much like a Monarch that needs more work to reach its ATK/DEF desired. [/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Ninja Posted June 20, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2011 @sleepy The effect conditions are an accommodation if the set monster has low ATK/DEF, even 0/0. If you're lucky, it can go past 2500. Thinking about it now though, it is a huge cost to pay. *works on that* Thanks for the OCG though. I have it fixed in the card maker. Will update when I balance out the costs. Oh! n *takes note of that OCG lesson* thanks a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Ninja Posted June 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 Finally! Updated once more. BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Ninja Posted June 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 feedback on the last edit? BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.